Literature DB >> 3314496

Clinical relevance of culture versus screens for the detection of microbial pathogens in urine specimens.

J A Kellogg1, J P Manzella, S N Shaffer, B B Schwartz.   

Abstract

The use of screens to detect "significant levels" of pathogenic microorganisms in urine specimens offers the advantages of both rapidly reporting results and controlling costs. Many of these screens, however, are insensitive at microbial counts below 10(5) colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of urine. It is increasingly apparent that patients with almost any type of urinary tract infection (except for most patients who are asymptomatic or who have pyelonephritis) may have urine concentrations of pathogens as low as 10(2) to 10(3) CFU/ml. This review documents factors that can contribute to diminished concentrations of microorganisms in urine, lists patient populations in whose urine microorganisms in concentrations well below 10(5) CFU/ml have been associated with infection, and makes recommendations for selection of laboratory tests, including rapid screens, for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3314496     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90907-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  15 in total

1.  Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures.

Authors:  Z Zaman; S Roggeman; J Verhaegen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Determination of cut-off values for leucocytes and bacteria for urine flow cytometer (UF-100) in urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Tulay Koken; Orhan C Aktepe; Mustafa Serteser; Murat Samli; Ahmet Kahraman; Nurhan Dogan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Efficacy of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of urinary tract immunoglobulins for diagnosis of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; J P Manzella; J W Seiple; S J Fortna; J W Cook; J S Levisky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Simplified technique for detection of significant bacteriuria by microscopic examination of urine.

Authors:  C L Cardoso; C B Muraro; V L Siqueira; M Guilhermetti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Correlation of urinalysis and dipstick results with catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical ICU patients.

Authors:  Daniel S Schwartz; James E Barone
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Evaluation of six screening methods for detecting significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  T K Smith; A J Hudson; R C Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of the modified Bac-T-Screen and FiltraCheck-UTI urine screening systems for detection of clinically significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren; F Pikul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Enumeration of bacterial cell numbers and detection of significant bacteriuria by use of a new flow cytometry-based device.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okada; Toshiro Shirakawa; Akinobu Gotoh; Yutaka Kamiyama; Satoru Muto; Hisamitsu Ide; Yukio Hamaguchi; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Quantitative detection of Escherichia coli from urine of patients with bacteriuria by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Hinata; Toshiro Shirakawa; Hiroshi Okada; Katsumi Shigemura; Sadao Kamidono; Akinobu Gotoh
Journal:  Mol Diagn       Date:  2004

10.  Bedside diagnosis of outpatient childhood urinary tract infection using three-media dipslide culture test.

Authors:  Francisco E Anacleto; Lourdes P Resontoc; Grace H Padilla
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.