Literature DB >> 3886693

Detection of bacteriuria and pyuria within two minutes.

M T Pezzlo, M A Wetkowski, E M Peterson, L M de la Maza.   

Abstract

A study was performed to evaluate two rapid urine screening methods, Bac-T-Screen (Marion Laboratories, Inc., Kansas City, Mo.) and Chemstrip LN (Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics, BioDynamics, Indianapolis, Ind.), for their ability to screen for bacteriuria and pyuria within 2 min. A total of 1,000 urine specimens were tested with the Bac-T-Screen and the Chemstrip LN and compared with a semiquantitative plate culture method. Of the 1,000 specimens tested, 249 had colony counts of greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml by the culture method. Of these, the Bac-T-Screen detected 94.8% (236 of 249) and the Chemstrip LN detected 84.7% (210 of 249). There were 120 pure cultures of probable pathogens of which the Bac-T-Screen detected 97.5% (117 of 120) and the Chemstrip LN detected 91.7% (110 of 120). Leukocyte counts were performed on all specimens, and both methods have the ability to detect greater than 10 leukocytes per mm3 in a majority (greater than 93%) of the specimens. The cost per test for a negative screen is approximately $1.30 for the Bac-T-Screen and $0.40 for the Chemstrip LN. Overall there is a similar negative predictive value with both methods for bacteriuria and pyuria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3886693      PMCID: PMC271723          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.21.4.578-581.1985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  16 in total

Review 1.  Automated methods for detection of bacteriuria.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a urine screening device.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C A Baum; A C Niles; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of leukocyte esterase activity as a rapid screening technique for bacteriuria.

Authors:  J L Perry; J S Matthews; D E Weesner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a bacteriuria detection device for urine screening.

Authors:  J R Davis; C E Stager; G F Araj
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Evaluation of a two-minute test for urine screening.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; M A Wetkowski; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Use of leukocyte esterase-nitrate activity as predictive assays of significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  D L Smalley; A N Dittmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-09

8.  Rapid detection of pyuria by leukocyte esterase activity.

Authors:  R K Kusumi; P J Grover; C M Kunin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Colorimetric method for rapid determination of bacteriuria.

Authors:  C Wallis; J L Melnick; C J Longoria
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Measurement of pyuria and its relation to bacteriuria.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-07-28       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  10 in total

1.  Rapid bioluminescence method for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; V Ige; A P Woolard; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of bacteriuria and pyuria by URISCREEN a rapid enzymatic screening test.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; D Amsterdam; J P Anhalt; T Lawrence; N J Stratton; E A Vetter; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid screening of urine for bacteria and cells by using a catalase reagent.

Authors:  S A Berger; B Bogokowsky; C Block
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Visual and clinical analysis of Bac-T-Screen urine screen results.

Authors:  E J Baron; M B Tyburski; R Almon; M Berman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the modified Bac-T-Screen and FiltraCheck-UTI urine screening systems for detection of clinically significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  P R Murray; A C Niles; R L Heeren; F Pikul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Inability of the Chemstrip LN compared with quantitative urine culture to predict significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  C Jones; D W MacPherson; D L Stevens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Detection of urinary tract infections by rapid methods.

Authors:  M Pezzlo
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Clinical evaluation of three urine screening tests.

Authors:  P R Murray; T B Smith; T C McKinney
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  High Prevalence of Sterile Pyuria in the Setting of Sexually Transmitted Infection in Women Presenting to an Emergency Department.

Authors:  Stacia B Shipman; Chelsea R Risinger; Crystalle M Evans; Chelsey D Gilbertson; David E Hogan
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-02-26

Review 10.  Paper and thread as media for the frugal detection of urinary tract infections (UTIs).

Authors:  Amrutha Hasandka; Ankita Ramchandran Singh; Anusha Prabhu; Hardik Ramesh Singhal; M S Giri Nandagopal; Naresh Kumar Mani
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 4.142

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.