Literature DB >> 32355618

Variations Among Human Lumbar Spine Segments and Their Relationships to In Vitro Biomechanics: A Retrospective Analysis of 281 Motion Segments From 85 Cadaveric Spines.

Anna G U Sawa1, Jennifer N Lehrman1, Neil R Crawford2, Brian P Kelly1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical properties of intact spinal motion segments are used to establish baseline values during in vitro studies evaluating spinal surgical techniques and implants. These properties are also used to validate computational models (ie, patient-specific finite element models) of human lumbar spine segments. Our laboratory has performed a large number of in vitro mechanical studies of lumbar spinal segments, using a consistent methodology. This provides extensive biomechanical data for a large number of intact motion segments, along with donor demographic variables, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, and geometric properties. The objective of this study was to analyze how donor demographics, BMD, and geometric properties of cadaveric lumbar spine segments affect motion segment flexibility, including the range of motion (ROM), lax zone (LZ), and stiff zone (SZ), to help improve our understanding of spinal biomechanics.
METHODS: A retrospective study examined the relationships between the biomechanical properties of 281 lumbar motion segments from 85 human cadaveric spines, donor demographic variables (age, sex, weight, height, and body mass index), and specimen measurements (vertebral body height, intervertebral disc height, and BMD).
RESULTS: Statistical correlation and regression analyses showed that the flexibility of a lumbar motion segment is affected by lumbar level, donor age, sex, and weight as well as the intervertebral disc height, vertebral body height, and bone quality. Increased disc height was associated with decreased ROM (axial rotation), decreased LZ (flexion-extension and axial rotation), and increased SZ (flexion-extension and lateral bending) in the male group, but increased ROM (lateral bending) in the female group. Increased vertebral body height correlated with increased LZ (lateral bending) in the female group. Increased BMD correlated with decreased ROM overall.
CONCLUSIONS: Biomechanical measurements from flexibility testing of cadaveric lumbar spine segments are significantly correlated with donor demographics and specimen measurements. Many of these correlations are sex-dependent. ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; flexibility; lumbar motion segment; range of motion; regression analysis; spine

Year:  2020        PMID: 32355618      PMCID: PMC7188089          DOI: 10.14444/7021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  15 in total

1.  A new technique for determining 3-D joint angles: the tilt/twist method.

Authors:  N R Crawford; G T Yamaguchi; C A Dickman
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Influence of interpersonal geometrical variation on spinal motion segment stiffness: implications for patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Gerdine J M Meijer; Jasper Homminga; Albert G Veldhuizen; Gijsbertus J Verkerke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Construction of local vertebral coordinate systems using a digitizing probe. Technical note.

Authors:  N R Crawford; C A Dickman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar spine finite element model for healthy subjects: development and validation.

Authors:  Ming Xu; James Yang; Isador H Lieberman; Ram Haddas
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.763

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Do early stages of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration really cause instability? Evaluation of an in vitro database.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; F Rohlmann; C Ring; C Mack; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Characterization of the relationship between joint laxity and maternal hormones in pregnancy.

Authors:  Mary L Marnach; Kirk D Ramin; Patrick S Ramsey; Seak-Whan Song; Jacqueline J Stensland; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The role of obesity in the biomechanics and radiological changes of the spine: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Luis Perez-Orribo; Samuel Kalb; Phillip M Reyes; Anna G U S Newcomb; Jeremy Hughes; Nicholas Theodore; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-12-11

9.  Effects of motion segment level, Pfirrmann intervertebral disc degeneration grade and gender on lumbar spine kinematics.

Authors:  Muturi G Muriuki; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Gerard Carandang; Michael R Zindrick; Mark A Lorenz; Laurie Lomasney; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Effects of aging and spinal degeneration on mechanical properties of lumbar supraspinous and interspinous ligaments.

Authors:  Takahiro Iida; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Yoshihisa Kotani; Kiyoshi Kaneda
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  3 in total

1.  In Vitro Biomechanics of Human Cadaveric Cervical Spines With Mature Fusion.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Phillip M Reyes; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

2.  Range of Motion Testing of a Novel 3D-Printed Synthetic Spine Model.

Authors:  Michael A Bohl; Sarah McBryan; Anna G U S Newcomb; Jennifer N Lehrman; Brian P Kelly; Peter Nakaji; Steve W Chang; Juan S Uribe; Jay D Turner; U Kumar Kakarla
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-06-23

3.  Automated Pipeline to Generate Anatomically Accurate Patient-Specific Biomechanical Models of Healthy and Pathological FSUs.

Authors:  Sebastiano Caprara; Fabio Carrillo; Jess G Snedeker; Mazda Farshad; Marco Senteler
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.