Literature DB >> 26990567

Effects of motion segment level, Pfirrmann intervertebral disc degeneration grade and gender on lumbar spine kinematics.

Muturi G Muriuki1, Robert M Havey1,2, Leonard I Voronov1,2, Gerard Carandang1, Michael R Zindrick1,2,3, Mark A Lorenz1,2,3, Laurie Lomasney4, Avinash G Patwardhan1,2.   

Abstract

MRI allows non-invasive assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration with the added clinical benefit of using non-ionizing radiation. What has remained unclear is the relationship between assessed disc degeneration and lumbar spine kinematics. Kinematic outcomes of 54 multi-segment (L1-Sacrum) lumbar spine specimens were calculated to discover if such an underlying relationship exists with degeneration assessed using the Pfirrmann grading system. Further analyses were also conducted to determine if kinematic outcomes were affected by motion segment level, gender or applied compressive preload. Range of motion, hysteresis, high flexibility zone size and rotational stiffness in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were the kinematic outcomes. Caudal intervertebral discs in our study sample were more degenerative than cranial discs. L5-S1 discs had the largest flexion-extension range of motion (p < 0.005) and L1-L2 discs the lowest flexion high flexibility zone size (p < 0.013). No other strict cranial-caudal differences in kinematic outcomes were found. Low flexibility zone rotational stiffness increased with disc degeneration grade in extension, lateral bending and axial rotation (p < 0.001). Trends towards higher hysteresis and lower range of motion with increased degeneration were observed in flexion-extension and lateral bending. Applied compressive preload increased flexion-extension hysteresis and augmented the effect of degeneration on hysteresis (p < 0.0005). Female specimens had about one degree larger range of motion in all rotational modes, and higher flexion extension hysteresis (p = 0.016). These results suggest that gender differences exist in lumbar spine kinematics. Additionally high disc loads, applied compressive preload or applied moment, are needed to kinematically distinguish discs with different levels of degeneration.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:1389-1398, 2016. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; high and low flexibility zone; hysteresis; range of motion; rotational stiffness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26990567     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  14 in total

1.  TonEBP-deficiency accelerates intervertebral disc degeneration underscored by matrix remodeling, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and changes in proinflammatory gene expression.

Authors:  Steven Tessier; Victoria A Tran; Olivia K Ottone; Emanuel J Novais; Alexandra Doolittle; Michael J DiMuzio; Irving M Shapiro; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 11.583

2.  MR Elastography-derived Stiffness: A Biomarker for Intervertebral Disc Degeneration.

Authors:  Benjamin A Walter; Prasath Mageswaran; Xiaokui Mo; Daniel J Boulter; Hazem Mashaly; Xuan V Nguyen; Luciano M Prevedello; William Thoman; Brian D Raterman; Prateek Kalra; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras; Arunark Kolipaka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Characteristics of lumbar disc degeneration and risk factors for collapsed lumbar disc in Korean farmers and fishers.

Authors:  Chaeyoung Hong; Chul Gab Lee; Hansoo Song
Journal:  Ann Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-05-14

4.  TAK-242 treatment and its effect on mechanical properties and gene expression associated with IVD degeneration in SPARC-null mice.

Authors:  Mitchel C Whittal; Sarah J Poynter; Kayla Samms; K Josh Briar; Sabrina I Sinopoli; Magali Millecamps; Laura S Stone; Stephanie J DeWitte-Orr; Diane E Gregory
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  New Horizons in Spine Research: Disc biology, spine biomechanics and pathomechanisms of back pain.

Authors:  James C Iatridis; James Kang; Rita Kandel; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Arp2/3 inactivation causes intervertebral disc and cartilage degeneration with dysregulated TonEBP-mediated osmoadaptation.

Authors:  Steven Tessier; Alexandra C Doolittle; Kimheak Sao; Jeremy D Rotty; James E Bear; Veronica Ulici; Richard F Loeser; Irving M Shapiro; Brian O Diekman; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-02-27

7.  Variations Among Human Lumbar Spine Segments and Their Relationships to In Vitro Biomechanics: A Retrospective Analysis of 281 Motion Segments From 85 Cadaveric Spines.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Jennifer N Lehrman; Neil R Crawford; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

8.  Diffusion based MR measurements correlates with age-related changes in human intervertebral disks.

Authors:  Ron Alkalay; Hackney David
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.034

9.  The segment-dependent changes in lumbar intervertebral space height during flexion-extension motion.

Authors:  M Fu; Q Ye; C Jiang; L Qian; D Xu; Y Wang; P Sun; J Ouyang
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 10.  Biological challenges for regeneration of the degenerated disc using cellular therapies.

Authors:  Michael Bendtsen; Cody Bunger; Pauline Colombier; Catherine Le Visage; Sally Roberts; Daisuke Sakai; Jill P G Urban
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.