Literature DB >> 9076889

Construction of local vertebral coordinate systems using a digitizing probe. Technical note.

N R Crawford1, C A Dickman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: When studying three-dimensional motion of multiple-vertebra spine segments in vitro, it is often desirable to report the kinematics at the individual vertebral levels in terms of each level's local coordinates systems. A novel technique is described for constructing local vertebral coordinate axes using a standard digitizing probe.
OBJECTIVES: To describe a technique that was developed to allow researchers to relate vertebral landmarks to optical markers and to set the local coordinate axes of several vertebrae accurately through a short, simple procedure performed only once at the beginning of a spine testing experiment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Other researchers have used radiographs and careful marker placement for establishing the coordinate systems of vertebrae and the relationships of anatomic landmarks to optical markers. The authors found no publications giving details of how vertebral coordinate systems are established from anatomic landmarks.
METHODS: A digitizing probe is used to identify vertebral landmarks and to relate these landmarks to optical markers attached to the vertebrae. An algorithm is described whereby vertebral coordinate axes are constructed from the landmarks.
RESULTS: The method described has been implemented successfully in a computerized in vitro spinal flexibility testing system that plots each individual motion segment's load-deformation curves in real time during experimentation. The proposed technique is less labor intensive and error prone than the earlier methods because landmarks are identified directly.
CONCLUSIONS: The described technique quickly, easily, and accurately relates anatomic landmarks to optical markers and constructs local coordinate axes, two steps that are necessary before monitoring the kinematics of individual motion segments during multilevel spine testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9076889     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199703010-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of an interfacet joint decompression and stabilization system.

Authors:  Jeremi M Leasure; Jenni Buckley
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  In Vitro Biomechanics of Human Cadaveric Cervical Spines With Mature Fusion.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Phillip M Reyes; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-09-22

5.  Biomechanical Effects of Proximal Polyetheretherketone Rod Extension on the Upper Instrumented and Adjacent Levels in a Human Long-Segment Construct: A Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Bernardo de Andrada Pereira; Jennifer N Lehrman; Anna G U Sawa; Piyanat Wangsawatwong; Jakub Godzik; David S Xu; Jay D Turner; Brian P Kelly; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

6.  Comparing the Biomechanical Stability of Cortical Screw Trajectory Versus Standard Pedicle Screw Trajectory for Short- and Long-Segment Posterior Fixation in 3-Column Thoracic Spinal Injury.

Authors:  Amey R Savardekar; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Anna G U S Newcomb; Phillip M Reyes; Hector Soriano-Baron; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of interbody fixation with secondary augmentation: lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jakub Godzik; Samuel Kalb; Marco T Reis; Phillip M Reyes; Vaneet Singh; Anna G U S Newcomb; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

8.  Variations Among Human Lumbar Spine Segments and Their Relationships to In Vitro Biomechanics: A Retrospective Analysis of 281 Motion Segments From 85 Cadaveric Spines.

Authors:  Anna G U Sawa; Jennifer N Lehrman; Neil R Crawford; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-04-30

9.  In Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel, Minimally Invasive, Sacroiliac Joint Fixation Device.

Authors:  William W Cross; Sigurd H Berven; Nick Slater; Jennifer N Lehrman; Anna G U S Newcomb; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

10.  Comparison of posterior fixation alone and supplementation with posterolateral fusion in thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Jong-Uk Hwang; Jin-Woo Hur; Jong-Won Lee; Ki-Young Kwon; Hyun-Koo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.