Literature DB >> 3206270

Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices: I. A conceptual framework.

M M Panjabi1.   

Abstract

In the field of spinal fixation devices, there is a profusion of new instrumentations. Often, the biomechanical evaluation is done in a nonstandardized manner, which makes it difficult to compare the results of one researcher with those of another, for the same device or for different devices. There is a need for a conceptual framework under which guidelines may be suggested for the evaluation of these devices in some uniform and comprehensive manner. There are three basic biomechanical tests: strength, fatigue, and stability. The strength test evaluates the failure load of the device, determines its weak points, and is helpful in the initial development of the device. The fatigue test provides a measure of longevity of the device, either alone or as part of the spinal construct, by testing the device to failure using cyclically varying loads. In contrast, the stability test measures the capability of the device to provide multi-directional stability to the injured spine. There is no failure of the device, and the results of this test are clinically important, as they characterize the potential for early fracture healing and early fusion. A conceptual framework for the evaluation of multi-direction stability of spinal fixation devices and guidelines for designing the necessary experiments are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3206270     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198810000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  60 in total

1.  Biomechanical behaviour in vitro of the spine and lumbosacral junction.

Authors:  X Barthes; B Walter; R Zeller; J F Dubousset
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Thoracolumbar fracture stabilization: comparative biomechanical evaluation of a new video-assisted implantable system.

Authors:  M Schultheiss; E Hartwig; L Kinzl; L Claes; H-J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Michael Blauth; Daniel Briem; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine locked and unlocked plate-fixation systems.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Daniel Briem; Michael Blauth; Ulf Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of a posterior non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Werner Schmoelz; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Alexander C Disch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A history of spine biomechanics. Focus on 20th century progress.

Authors:  T R Oxland
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Biomechanical Comparison of Robotically Applied Pure Moment, Ideal Follower Load, and Novel Trunk Weight Loading Protocols on L4-L5 Cadaveric Segments during Flexion-Extension.

Authors:  Charles R Bennett; Denis J DiAngelo; Brian P Kelly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

8.  Comparison of Intervertebral ROM in Multi-Level Cadaveric Lumbar Spines Using Distinct Pure Moment Loading Approaches.

Authors:  Brandon Santoni; Andres F Cabezas; Daniel J Cook; Matthew S Yeager; James B Billys; Benjamin Whiting; Boyle C Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

9.  In vitro investigation of a new dynamic cervical implant: comparison to spinal fusion and total disc replacement.

Authors:  Bastian Welke; Michael Schwarze; Christof Hurschler; Thorsten Book; Stephan Magdu; Dorothea Daentzer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical analysis of a new expandable vertebral body replacement combined with a new polyaxial antero-lateral plate and/or pedicle screws and rods.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Stefanie Erhart; Stefan Unger; Kuno Weise; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.