N R Crawford1, G T Yamaguchi, C A Dickman. 1. Spinal Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA. ncrawfo@chw.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method of representing 3-D joint angles that is both physically meaningful and mathematically stable. DESIGN: The two halves of a joint are modeled as overlapping cylinders. This simple physical model is easily understood and yields mathematically stable angle equations. BACKGROUND: Two currently-used methods are the Euler/Cardan (joint coordinate system) method and the projection angle method. Both of these methods approach a singularity at 90 degrees that limits their use. The helical angle (attitude vector) method is mathematically stable but has limited physical meaning and is difficult to communicate. METHODS: Calculation of the tilt/twist angles is described. Tilt/twist angles are compared to Euler/Cardan, projection, and helical angles in terms of behavior and stability. RESULTS: Through a small range of angulation, tilt/twist angles match the specific projection and Euler/Cardan angles previously found to be appropriate for describing spinal motion. Through larger ranges, tilt/twist angles do not match the other angles studied. Although not as stable as helical angles, tilt/twist angles are twice as stable as Euler/Cardan and projection angles, reaching a singularity only at 180 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Because of their mathematical stability and simple physical interpretation, tilt/twist angles are recommended as a standard in describing angular joint motion.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method of representing 3-D joint angles that is both physically meaningful and mathematically stable. DESIGN: The two halves of a joint are modeled as overlapping cylinders. This simple physical model is easily understood and yields mathematically stable angle equations. BACKGROUND: Two currently-used methods are the Euler/Cardan (joint coordinate system) method and the projection angle method. Both of these methods approach a singularity at 90 degrees that limits their use. The helical angle (attitude vector) method is mathematically stable but has limited physical meaning and is difficult to communicate. METHODS: Calculation of the tilt/twist angles is described. Tilt/twist angles are compared to Euler/Cardan, projection, and helical angles in terms of behavior and stability. RESULTS: Through a small range of angulation, tilt/twist angles match the specific projection and Euler/Cardan angles previously found to be appropriate for describing spinal motion. Through larger ranges, tilt/twist angles do not match the other angles studied. Although not as stable as helical angles, tilt/twist angles are twice as stable as Euler/Cardan and projection angles, reaching a singularity only at 180 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Because of their mathematical stability and simple physical interpretation, tilt/twist angles are recommended as a standard in describing angular joint motion.
Authors: Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford Journal: Clin Spine Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 1.876
Authors: Gianluca Del Rossi; Marybeth H Horodyski; Bryan P Conrad; Christian P Di Paola; Matthew J Di Paola; Glenn R Rechtine Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2008 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Amey R Savardekar; Nestor G Rodriguez-Martinez; Anna G U S Newcomb; Phillip M Reyes; Hector Soriano-Baron; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2019-06-30
Authors: Jakub Godzik; Samuel Kalb; Marco T Reis; Phillip M Reyes; Vaneet Singh; Anna G U S Newcomb; Steve W Chang; Brian P Kelly; Neil R Crawford Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2018-06
Authors: William W Cross; Sigurd H Berven; Nick Slater; Jennifer N Lehrman; Anna G U S Newcomb; Brian P Kelly Journal: Int J Spine Surg Date: 2018-10-15