Literature DB >> 32346024

Common genetic variation in obesity, lipid transfer genes and risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Results from IDEFICS/I.Family study and meta-analysis.

Rajini Nagrani1, Ronja Foraita2, Francesco Gianfagna3,4, Licia Iacoviello5, Staffan Marild6, Nathalie Michels7, Dénes Molnár8, Luis Moreno9, Paola Russo10, Toomas Veidebaum11, Wolfgang Ahrens2,12, Manuela Marron2.   

Abstract

As the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in children and young adults is increasing, a better understanding of genetics that underlie MetS will provide critical insights into the origin of the disease. We examined associations of common genetic variants and repeated MetS score from early childhood to adolescence in a pan-European, prospective IDEFICS/I.Family cohort study with baseline survey and follow-up examinations after two and six years. We tested associations in 3067 children using a linear mixed model and confirmed the results with meta-analysis of identified SNPs. With a stringent Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons we obtained significant associations(p < 1.4 × 10-4) for 5 SNPs, which were in high LD (r2 > 0.85) in the 16q12.2 non-coding intronic chromosomal region of FTO gene with strongest association observed for rs8050136 (effect size(β) = 0.31, pWald = 1.52 × 10-5). We also observed a strong association of rs708272 in CETP with increased HDL (p = 5.63 × 10-40) and decreased TRG (p = 9.60 × 10-5) levels. These findings along with meta-analysis advance etiologic understanding of childhood MetS, highlighting that genetic predisposition to MetS is largely driven by genes of obesity and lipid metabolism. Inclusion of the associated genetic variants in polygenic scores for MetS may prove to be fundamental for identifying children and subsequently adults of the high-risk group to allow earlier targeted interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32346024      PMCID: PMC7188794          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64031-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

A collection of risk factors, including central obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension, describes metabolic syndrome (MetS). Additionally, MetS is a known precursor in cardiovascular disease development[1]. MetS has become a major public health concern globally due to its increasing prevalence and association with various chronic diseases[2]. MetS etiology is quite complex, involving a strong interplay between multiple genetic, environmental and lifestyle-related factors. In European ancestry, the heritability of the MetS was estimated to be between 13–30%[3,4]. The early prognosis of MetS is therefore extremely valuable for early detection of individuals at high genetic risk of developing the disease later in life and for encouraging change in lifestyle to reduce risk. While numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with individual metabolic components and diseases have been reported in genome-wide association studies (GWAS)[5-8], the effect of these polymorphisms on the MetS network and related diseases is not well studied. Further, of all MetS components, lipid levels seem under higher genetic determination[9]. This has also been observed in the genetic association studies suggesting that genetic effects on lipid levels are more pronounced than for other traits[10]. Most of the genetic association studies for MetS have been conducted in adult population[5,10,11] and are limited by the usage of one-point measurements[7,12-14]. As the prevalence of MetS in children and young adults is increasing[15], a better understanding of the genetics that underlies MetS throughout childhood and adolescence will provide critical insights into the origin of the disease. We performed a longitudinal analysis using a repeated measurement design for the effect of genetic variants on a quantitative MetS score from early childhood to adolescence. We examined the association between 350 pre-selected variants and the MetS score derived from measured waist circumference (WC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglycerides (TRG), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in a pan-European children cohort.

Methodology

Study population

The study population was enrolled in a pan-European, multi-center, prospective IDEFICS/I.Family cohort across three-time points. The IDEFICS baseline survey included a population-based sample of 16,229 children aged 2 to 9.9 years from eight European countries (Belgium, Cyprus, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain, and Sweden) who were examined the first time in 2007/2008. Follow-up examinations were conducted after two (T1) and six (T3, I.Family study) years[16,17]. In our longitudinal analysis using repeated measurement design, both baseline and follow-up data from the IDEFICS and I.Family study were included from all countries except Cyprus, for understanding the associations of genetic variants with MetS. In the IDEFICS/I.Family study, risk factors of lifestyle-related outcomes were investigated in young children and anthropometric and clinical examinations were conducted at each survey wave. Additionally, health characteristics and lifestyle behaviors were collected and biosamples were taken (Details in Supplementary methods). Parents gave written informed consent before study participation and children gave oral consent before the examinations. Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant local or national ethics committees by each of the study centers, namely from the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Ghent (Belgium), the Tallinn Medical Research Ethics Committee of the National Institutes for Health Development (Estonia), the Ethics Committee of the University Bremen (Germany), the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Medical Research Council Budapest (Hungary), the Ethics Committee of the Health Office Avellino (Italy), the Ethics Committee for Clinical Research of Aragon (Spain), and the Regional Ethical Review Board of Gothenburg (Sweden). We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental guidelines and regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research.

MetS Score

There are no universal definitions of MetS in children, we have, therefore, utilized a continuous MetS score as documented in a recent publication on the IDEFICS study. The MetS score was calculated summing age and sex-specific z-scores of WC, HOMA-IR, HDL, TRG, SBP, and DBP according to the following formula by Ahrens et al.[18]: The components used to calculate the MetS score were based on the same risk factors used in the adult MetS definition. A higher score was associated with an unfavorable metabolic profile[18]. A detailed description of the measurements of components of MetS has been published previously[18].

Genotyping and quality control of SNP data

Genomic DNA was extracted either from saliva or blood samples. Genotyping was conducted in two batches on 3492 children using the UK Biobank Axiom 196-Array from Affymetrix (Santa Clara, USA). We applied extensive quality control metrics to the data following the recommendations of Weale M[19], based on which we excluded the following: SNPs with a call rate of less than 97.5%, failure to meet Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at a p-value of less than 10−4, a minor allele frequency (MAF) of less than 0.5% (batch 1) and 0.08% (batch 2), samples with a call rate of less than 98% (batch 1) and 96% (batch 2), poor intensity, sex mismatch, anomalous high heterozygosity (cut-off of 3 standard deviations (SD) from mean), cryptic relatedness, no phenotypic information or as population outliers with any of a sample’s standardized principal component (PC) loading exceeds the interval mean ±3 SD[19,20]. We did quality control filtering using Affymetrix calling software APT and the R packages genABEL[21] and SNPRelate[22]. A sample of 3067 children remained for further analyses. Genome-wide imputation was carried out using the Minimac3 v2.0.1 software and reference haplotypes from unrelated individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project phase III v5. To address the issue of population stratification, we performed a principal components analysis using the SNPRelate v1.10.2 R package, where the eigenvectors or PCs are sorted in decreasing order of the corresponding eigenvalues. The first eigenvector (PC1) has the most variation in the data on the genetic matrix (SNP by sample); the second eigenvector (PC2) has the second-most, and so on. To account for relatedness in our sample, we calculated the genetic relatedness matrix (GRM) from the genotype data using the program EMMAX v20120210 (https://genome.sph.umich.edu/wiki/EMMAX). The GRM matrix along with relatedness further adjusts for population stratification.

Selection of candidate SNPs

A custom panel of SNPs were selected for analysis in this study using the following three strategies: (a) SNPs significantly associated in previous GWAS studies (p < 5 × 10−8) with MetS were identified using NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog[23] and PubMed search (n = 29); (b) All SNP from candidate studies which were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with MetS were included using SNP curator platform[24] (n = 193); (c) genes associated with MetS (using DisGenet browser[25]) and involved in lipid metabolism pathway (CTdbase[26]) were uploaded into the Candidate gene SNP selection (Genepipe) pipeline of “SNPinfo” a web-based SNP selection tool[27] with European study population. The algorithm used for selecting SNPs from the provided list of genes was as follows: five kb upstream and 1 kb downstream of the gene coordinate were included in the selection. SNPs showing a MAF of 0.05 or greater were included. Tagging proportion cut-off to filter a gene was kept at 0.8 and the linkage disequilibrium (LD) threshold cut off was kept at 0.8. The minimum number of SNPs tagged by a tag SNP was set to 3. To ensure that each gene has some coverage a minimum of 1 tag SNP to a maximum of 5 tag SNPs per gene were included. Further SNPs were filtered using the functional SNP prediction in “Genepipe” that causes an amino acid change or that may alter the functional or structural properties of the translated protein, disrupt transcription factor binding sites, disrupt splice sites or other functional sites. A total of 156 SNPs were identified using this strategy. Overall, we obtained 371 SNPs after removing duplicates among the three selection strategies, out of which we had genotyping data from 357 SNPs. After excluding 4 monomorphic SNPs and 3 SNPs due to quality control issues, the final analyses were carried out on 350 SNPs (n = 117 genotyped, n = 233 imputed).

Meta-analysis

We carried out a meta-analysis to review associations between FTO variants significantly associated in the present study (rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609, rs1421085) and MetS as the outcome. We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus and supplemented it by scanning reference lists of articles identified (including reviews) up to December 2019. The search strategy is detailed in Supplementary Methods. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they had met all of the following criteria: (1) provided additive odds ratios (ORs) or sufficient genotypic information for calculating ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CI); (2) were retrospective or prospective in design, and (3) were conducted in humans. Studies reporting on components of MetS alone were excluded from the analysis. For each study included, the following information was extracted: first author, year of publication, geographical location, study design, sample size, number of cases and controls, information on assay performed for genotyping, effect sizes, allele/genotypic frequency in cases and controls, and confounders adjusted for in reported associations. The quality of each included study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies[28] which range from zero points (low quality) to nine points (high quality). If multiple publications on the same study data were available, the most up-to-date or comprehensive information was used. Methods and results are reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA) guidelines[29].

Statistical analysis

The characteristics of study participants were presented as means (± SD) for continuous variables and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. Associations between SNPs and repeated MetS score values of non-independent individuals were analyzed using the Wald t-test with one degree of freedom applied on linear mixed models (LMM), using the R package GMMAT[30] adjusting for age, sex, country of residence and the top five PCs as fixed effects, and using a kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect included in the model. To account for multiple testing, we corrected the statistical significance level to α = 0.05/350 = 1.4 × 10−4 by the Bonferroni correction and false discovery rate (FDR) method for the 350 hypothesis tests. For further analysis, we presented results for only those SNPs that survived the FDR correction. We stratified association models by sex, controlling for age, country of residence, first five PCs and kinship matrix. Additionally, we performed conditional analyses on the FTO locus rs8050136 as a covariate. To identify the driving factor in the association of SNPs and MetS, we recalculated the LMM with each of the MetS components: WC, HOMA-IR, HDL, TRG, SBP, and DBP. Throughout, we used r² to report LD between pairs of SNPs. Quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots and the genomic inflation factor (λ) were used to evaluate control of type I error. LocusZoom[31] was used to plot regions harboring significant signals (p < 1.4 × 10−4) to visualize LD patterns. Statistical analyses were performed using R 3.5.3 and Stata 15. All statistical tests were 2- sided.

Functional annotation using existing datasets

To identify potential causal genes explaining the observed genetic associations with MetS, we searched for existing expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) SNPs in the eQTL dataset GTEx V8[32]. We estimated the associations between the identified lead SNP and transcript expression levels for genes within a +/− 1 Mb cis window around the transcription start site or a trans-gene.

In-silico functional analysis

We examined the potential functional significance of the SNPs that reached the significance level using the combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD) method proposed by Kircher and colleagues[33]. CADD produces a single C score to measure the deleteriousness of a given variant, which will greatly improve in prioritizing the causal variants while conducting genetic analyses[33]. We also extracted the RegulomeDB score to describe the regulatory potential of these SNPs[34]. Meta-analysis Crude ORs and 95% CIs in each study were estimated using a genetic additive model and evaluated for the strength of the associations between FTO variants and MetS risk. The study reported additive ORs were utilized when sufficient information on genotypic/allelic frequencies were not provided. Study-specific risk estimates were pooled by using random-effects meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses were performed using fixed-effect meta-analyses. To determine whether the genotypes in the control group deviated from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) we used the R-package HardyWeinberg[35]. Heterogeneity was assessed using the standard χ2 tests and I2 statistic, where I2 > 50% indicated substantial heterogeneity[36]. Evidence of publication bias was sought using the Egger regression test for funnel asymmetry in addition to visual inspection of the funnel plots[37,38]. Two-sided P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

After quality control and analytical exclusions, we performed longitudinal analyses with genotypic information on 350 SNPs and repeated measures on study calculated MetS Scores from 3067 children at 3-time points (Fig. 1). Boys and girls were equally present in the analysis with a mean age of 6.20 (±1.77). Almost 5% of study participants were first degree relatives (Table 1).
Figure 1

Flowchart for inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Table 1

Study characteristics at baseline.

CharacteristicsMean (±SD)/n (%)N = 3067
Girls1535 (50.05)
No. of childrenT02987 (35.05)
T12907 (34.12)
T32627 (30.83)
New children enrolled at T180 (2.61)
Age (years)6.20 (±1.77)
Study RegionItaly644 (21.00)
Estonia299 (9.75)
Belgium214 (6.98)
Sweden434 (14.15)
Germany634 (20.67)
Hungary461 (15.03)
Spain381 (12.42)
BMI categories by Cole et al, 2012Thinness grade 1–3305 (9.94)
Normal weight2162 (70.49)
Overweight/obese600 (19.56)
SBP (mmHg), n = 2965100.44 (±9.07)
DBP (mmHg), n = 296663.26 (±6.39)
WC (cm), n = 301054.44 (±7.03)
HOMA-IR, n = 19460.92 (±0.74)
TRG (mg/dL), n = 263657.62 (±25.94)
HDL (mg/dL), n = 264052.51 (±14.28)
Metabolic Syndrome Score, n = 18450.21 (±2.65)
Relatedness1st degree (sharing ≥ 50% DNA)141 (4.59)
2nd degree (sharing < 50 to ≥ 25% DNA)188 (6.12)
Distant relation (sharing < 25 to ≥1% DNA)2728 (88.94)

BMI = body mass index, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HDL = high density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, SBP = systolic blood pressure, SD = standard deviation, TRG = triglycerides, WC = waist circumference. n stated in case of missingness.

Flowchart for inclusion/exclusion criteria. Study characteristics at baseline. BMI = body mass index, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HDL = high density lipoprotein, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, SBP = systolic blood pressure, SD = standard deviation, TRG = triglycerides, WC = waist circumference. n stated in case of missingness. MetS score was not available for 314 study participants in any survey. In total, 2,753 children were utilized for the main analysis to test the association between pre-selected candidate SNPs and longitudinal MetS score; however, we made use of all children to test SNP effects on the components of the MetS score. Details of exclusions are shown in the appendix (Supplementary Table 1). A genomic control factor λ of 1.22 in the Q-Q plot of the association p-values suggested slight systematic inflation (Supplementary Fig. 1). The first five PCs explain only 1% of variance suggesting there may be no hidden pattern in the dataset (Supplementary Fig. 2). Our results yielded significant associations for 13 SNPs with p-values corrected for FDR (Table 2). With a stringent Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, we obtained significant associations (p < 1.4 × 10−4) for 5 SNPs, which were highly correlated in the 16q12.2 chromosomal region in the non-coding intronic region of the FTO gene. The SNPs located in FTO gene were in high LD (r2 > 0.87), with the strongest association signal observed for rs8050136 (Pwald = 1.52 × 10−5) (Fig. 2). In LMMs conditioned on rs8050136, the risk of other variants in 16q12.2 was completely attenuated and non-significant (Supplementary Table 2). We could not replicate previously reported GWAS SNPs of MetS conducted on adults in the present children cohort (Supplementary Table 3). The allele frequencies reported in this study were comparable to those reported for European samples (Supplementary Table 4).
Table 2

Association of markers with longitudinal Metabolic Syndrome score in children of IDEFICS/I.Family study.

LocusChrSNP IDNEffect alleleEAFßSEp-valueMultiple correction
FDRBonferroni
FTO16q12.2rs80501362752A0.420.310.071.52 × 10−50.0020.005
FTO16q12.2rs11219802753A0.440.310.071.91 × 10−50.0020.007
FTO16q12.2rs1558902a2751A0.430.300.072.78 × 10−50.0020.010
FTO16q12.2rs99396092749A0.420.300.072.98 × 10-50.0020.010
FTO16q12.2rs14210852752C0.430.300.073.36 × 10-50.0020.012
FTO16q12.2rs8057044a2628A0.490.260.073.04 × 10−40.0180.106
CETP16q13rs7082722752A0.41−0.250.074.49 × 10−40.0230.157
FTO16q12.2rs80447692751T0.46−0.240.075.91 × 10−40.0260.207
SCG315q21.2rs3764220a2708G0.00045.841.811.26 × 10−30.0450.441
FTO16q12.2rs17817288a2635A0.48−0.230.071.41 × 10−30.0450.496
FTO16q12.2rs8047395a2540G0.47−0.230.071.49 × 10−30.0450.523
ACACB12q24.11rs20752602749G0.18−0.290.091.63 ×10−30.0450.571
GNPDA24p12rs10938397a2082G0.400.260.081.66 × 10−30.0450.581

ß = estimated coefficient, Chr = chromosome, EAF = effect allele frequency, FDR = false discovery rate, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, SE = standard error.

The effect allele is the allele corresponding to the calculated risk. Adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. SNPs significant after Bonferroni correction are marked in bold. aimputed SNPs.

Figure 2

Regional association plot of markers with longitudinal metabolic syndrome score in children, recombination hotspots, and linkage disequilibrium heatmap for the 16q12.2 locus. −log10 of p values (left y-axis) drawn from the study participants of IDEFICS/I.Family cohort for a 500 kb region covering the entire FTO gene. The purple circle indicates the query variant (rs8050136). The LD estimates are color-coded as a heatmap from dark blue (0 ≥ r2 > 0.2) to red (0.8 ≥ r2 > 1.0). The bottom panel shows the genes and their orientation for each region. We based the association analysis on a one degree of freedom Wald t-test applied on linear mixed model, adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. The blue line represents the recombination rate (right y-axis) to estimate putative recombination hotspots across the region from HapMap.

Association of markers with longitudinal Metabolic Syndrome score in children of IDEFICS/I.Family study. ß = estimated coefficient, Chr = chromosome, EAF = effect allele frequency, FDR = false discovery rate, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, SE = standard error. The effect allele is the allele corresponding to the calculated risk. Adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. SNPs significant after Bonferroni correction are marked in bold. aimputed SNPs. Regional association plot of markers with longitudinal metabolic syndrome score in children, recombination hotspots, and linkage disequilibrium heatmap for the 16q12.2 locus. −log10 of p values (left y-axis) drawn from the study participants of IDEFICS/I.Family cohort for a 500 kb region covering the entire FTO gene. The purple circle indicates the query variant (rs8050136). The LD estimates are color-coded as a heatmap from dark blue (0 ≥ r2 > 0.2) to red (0.8 ≥ r2 > 1.0). The bottom panel shows the genes and their orientation for each region. We based the association analysis on a one degree of freedom Wald t-test applied on linear mixed model, adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. The blue line represents the recombination rate (right y-axis) to estimate putative recombination hotspots across the region from HapMap. Using data for additional covariates, we performed sex-specific analyses for SNPs that reached statistical significance (Table 3). The associations were stronger in boys compared to girls. We further went ahead to analyze the repeated measures of components of the MetS score as the outcome to understand which of the components drove the observed association. The variants in FTO were associated with higher SBP and larger WC whereas the variant A of rs708272 in CETP was strongly associated with decreased TRG levels and increased HDL levels (Supplementary Table 5).
Table 3

Association of markers with longitudinal Metabolic Syndrome stratified by sex.

LocusChrSNP IDEffect alleleBoysGirls
EAFß (SE)p-valueEAFß (SE)p-value
FTO16q12.2rs8050136A0.420.33 (0.10)0.0010.420.29 (0.10)0.004
FTO16q12.2rs1121980A0.440.37 (0.10)<0.0010.450.25 (0.10)0.012
FTO16q12.2rs1558902A0.430.32 (0.10)0.0010.430.28 (0.10)0.005
FTO16q12.2rs9939609A0.420.30 (0.10)0.0020.420.30 (0.10)0.004
FTO16q12.2rs1421085C0.430.32 (0.10)0.0010.430.28 (0.10)0.006
FTO16q12.2rs8057044A0.490.33 (0.10)0.0010.490.21 (0.10)0.043
CETP16q13rs708272A0.41−0.32 (0.10)0.0020.41−0.18 (0.10)0.072
FTO16q12.2rs8044769T0.46−0.24 (0.10)0.0150.46−0.24 (0.10)0.014
SCG315q21.2rs3764220G0.00047.13 (2.42)0.0030.00043.74 (2.79)0.180
FTO16q12.2rs17817288A0.48−0.29 (0.10)0.0040.48−0.18 (0.10)0.074
FTO16q12.2rs8047395G0.46−0.35 (0.10)0.0010.47−0.13 (0.10)0.210
ACACB12q24.11rs2075260G0.17−0.27 (0.13)0.0450.18−0.33 (0.13)0.010
GNPDA24p12rs10938397G0.390.27 (0.12)0.0220.420.26 (0.11)0.025

ß = estimated coefficient, Chr = chromosome, EAF = effect allele frequency, FDR = false discovery rate, PVAL = p-value, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, SE = standard error.

The effect allele is the allele corresponding to the calculated risk. Adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. The results here are presented for the markers that reached statistical significance after correction for FDR in the main analysis in Table 2.

Association of markers with longitudinal Metabolic Syndrome stratified by sex. ß = estimated coefficient, Chr = chromosome, EAF = effect allele frequency, FDR = false discovery rate, PVAL = p-value, SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism, SE = standard error. The effect allele is the allele corresponding to the calculated risk. Adjusted for age, sex, country of residence, first five principal components as fixed effects and kinship matrix to define the covariance structure of the random effect. The results here are presented for the markers that reached statistical significance after correction for FDR in the main analysis in Table 2. A CADD-scaled C score of more than 10 for SNP rs8047395 (Supplementary Table 6) was observed in in-silico analyses. Similarly, a RegulomeDB score of four for three SNPs (rs8050136, rs1121980, and rs8044769; Supplementary Table 6) in the FTO gene was observed. Using existing eQTL datasets, we found that the rs8050136-A allele in muscle-skeletal tissue was associated with higher FTO gene expression based on the linear regression model. We screened 193 records (Fig. 3) and identified 38 eligible studies[39-77] for 5 FTO variants (8, 3, 3, 32, 10 studies for rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609 and rs1421085, respectively) on 80856 participants with 22462 cases and 58394 controls (Table 4). Including the present study there were 29760, 6343, 5532, 59411 and 9908 participants for rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609 and rs1421085 respectively. The control populations of the included studies were in HWE. In addition to ours, only 4 studies were conducted on children or adolescents. A forest plot of association of FTO variants with MetS is provided in Fig. 4. The OR for MetS and rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609 and rs1421085 was 1.17 (95% CI: 1.09–1.26), 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00–1.31), 1.26 (95% CI: 1.11–1.43), 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09–1.19) and 1.21 (95% CI: 1.08–1.35) respectively. The degree of between-study heterogeneity was least with I2 = 20.3% (P = 0.263) for rs8050136 and highest for rs1421085 with I2 = 53.5% (P = 0.018). Sensitivity analyses that used fixed-effect meta-analysis (rather than random-effects meta-analysis as in the primary analysis) yielded similar OR as random effect meta-analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3). There was no evidence for publication bias, as indicated by funnel plot analyses and Egger test for asymmetry (Supplementary Fig. 4).
Figure 3

Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process for Meta-analysis.

Table 4

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

AuthorSample SizeMetS cases (n)Controls (n)FTO variantsCriteria for MetSEthnicity/Study LocationPopulation TypeStudy Quality, NOS
Ahmad, 201021674477516899rs8050136modified NCEP ATP IIIWhite womenHealth professionals from an RCT9
Al-Attar, 200821214741647rs9939609IDF, NCEP ATP IIICanadians of multi-ethnic originGeneral7
Armamento-Villareal, 201616553112rs8050136JISCaucasiansObese older adults6
Attaoua, 2009b1193485rs1421085NCEP ATP IIICaucasiansObese women7
Attaoua, 200820775132rs1421085NCEP ATP IIICaucasiansPatients of PCOS6
Baik, 2012459014873103rs9939609AHA/NHLBIKoreanGeneral9
Chedraui, 201619210389rs9939609AHA/NHLBIEcuadorpostmenopausal women9
Cheung, 201114462251221rs8050136JISHong KongGeneral9
Col, 2017a1006040rs9939609NCEP ATP IIICaucasians in TurkeyObese adolescents6
Cruz, 2010936389547rs9939609AHA/NHLBIMexicoBlood donors without a family history of diabetes7
de Luis, 2013457186271rs9939609NCEP ATP IIICaucasiansObese females6
Dusatkova, 2013a14431111332rs9939609IDFCzech adolescentsunderweight, normal, overweight and obese adolescents9
Elouej, 2016685340345rs9939609, rs1421085IDFTunisianGeneral9
Fawwad, 2015296194102rs9939609IDF, NCEP ATP IIIPakistanPatients of Type 2 diabetes7
Freathy (NBFC1966), 200844232934130rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Freathy (Oxford Biobank), 20081149169980rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Freathy (Caerphilly), 20081046216830rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Freathy (UKT2D GCC Controls), 200818582991559rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Freathy (BWHHS), 2008319114491742rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Freathy (InChianti), 2008888250638rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEuropeanGeneral8
Guclu-Geyik, 201619679231044rs1421085, rs9939609NCEP ATP IIITurkishGeneral9
Hotta, 201116771096581rs1121980, rs1421085, rs1558902, rs8050136, rs9939609study-specificJapaneseHospital based5
Hu, 2015489245244rs1421085, rs9939609IDFKazakh adults of Xinjiang, chinaGeneral9
Khella, 201719792105rs9939609IDFEgyptianHospital based7
Liem, 2010a1275886389rs9939609IDFDutchGeneral9
Liguori, 20141000372628rs1121980, rs1421085, rs9939609AHA/NHLBIItalymorbidly obese6
Malgorzata, 2018425162263rs9939609IDFPolishGeneral8
Petkeviciene, 20161020360660rs9939609IDFLithuanianGeneral9
Phillips, 20121753877876rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIFrenchGeneral9
Ramos, 201519949150rs8050136, rs9939609JISCaucasiansPatients of PCOS6
Ranjith, 2011485295190rs9939609IDF, NCEP ATP IIIAsian IndianPatients of AMI7
Reynolds, 20131799386rs9939609IDFIrish/British CaucasianChronically treated patients with Schizophrenia6
Rodrigues, 201514611432rs9939609AHA/NHLBIMultiethnicBariatric surgery patients6
Rotter, 2016272144128rs9939609IDFCaucasianVolunteers from primary health care centres6
Sedaghati-khayat, 2018746341405rs1121980, rs1421085, rs1558902, rs8050136JISIranGeneral7
Sikhayeva, 2017697208489rs8050136, rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIEthnic KazakhsHospital-based9
Sjogren, 200814996384311153rs9939609study-specificSwedishGeneral8
Ślęzak, 201819110091rs1421085, rs1558902, rs9939609NCEP ATP IIIPolandNot given5
Steemburgo, 201223619244rs9939609JISBrazilPatients of Type 2 diabetes7
Tabara, 200920433331710rs9939609modified NCEP ATP IIIJapaneseGeneral6
Vankova, 201216416148rs9939609WHOBulgarianCentrally obese and normal volunteers5
Wang, 2010236108128rs1421085, rs8050136, rs9939609IDFHan ChineseOutpatients of endocrinology unit6
Zhao, 2014a34774313046rs9939609modified NCEP ATP IIIChineseGeneral9

AMI = acute myocardial infarction; IDF = International Diabetes Federation; JIS = Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, World Heart Federation, International Atherosclerosis Society and International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2009; MetS = metabolic syndrome; NCEP ATP II = the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; NOS Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; PCOS = polycystic ovarian syndrome; RCT = randomized controlled trials. aStudies conducted in the young population (age < 18 years),bsub-sample of the study was utilized. Genotypic frequency from NCEP ATP III was utilized in studies reporting both IDF and NCEP ATP III definitions of MetS.

Figure 4

Forest plots of random effect meta-analysis of the association of FTO variants (rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609, rs1421085) with Metabolic Syndrome. CI = confidence interval. Sizes of data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. Study-specific odds ratios were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Col, 2017; Dusatkova, 2013; Liem 2010; Zhao 2014 were conducted in the young population (age <18 years). Additive ORs were used as indicated in the study for Liem, 2010; Sjogren, 2008; Zhao; 2014.

Flow Diagram of Study Selection Process for Meta-analysis. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis. AMI = acute myocardial infarction; IDF = International Diabetes Federation; JIS = Joint Interim Statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, American Heart Association, World Heart Federation, International Atherosclerosis Society and International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2009; MetS = metabolic syndrome; NCEP ATP II = the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; NOS Newcastle - Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; PCOS = polycystic ovarian syndrome; RCT = randomized controlled trials. aStudies conducted in the young population (age < 18 years),bsub-sample of the study was utilized. Genotypic frequency from NCEP ATP III was utilized in studies reporting both IDF and NCEP ATP III definitions of MetS. Forest plots of random effect meta-analysis of the association of FTO variants (rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609, rs1421085) with Metabolic Syndrome. CI = confidence interval. Sizes of data markers indicate the weight of each study in the analysis. Study-specific odds ratios were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Col, 2017; Dusatkova, 2013; Liem 2010; Zhao 2014 were conducted in the young population (age <18 years). Additive ORs were used as indicated in the study for Liem, 2010; Sjogren, 2008; Zhao; 2014.

Discussion

Over the past decade, common genetic loci have been reported to be associated with MetS in different studies, mostly at a single time-point using a cross-sectional or a case-control approach[7,76,78]. Our study took a step ahead in investigating 350 pre-selected loci for their longitudinal association with a continuous MetS score during the transition from childhood to adolescence in a pan-European cohort of children with a follow-up period of up to seven years. We observed a strong association between common genetic variants in the FTO and longitudinal MetS score after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. We observed stronger associations in boys as compared to girls. The effect sizes observed in our study on children were much larger than those reported in adults further suggesting greater genetic predisposition and lower influence from environmental and behavioral factors in youth. The FTO gene codes for a nuclear protein of the non-haem iron and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent oxygenase superfamily, which is involved in posttranslational modification, DNA repair, and fatty acid metabolism[79]. FTO which is primarily expressed in the hypothalamus, plays a key role in energy homeostasis and regulation of food intake[80]. Even DNA methylation studies have shown an association with many pathological conditions including obesity[81,82]. FTO may thus play a role in metabolic regulation by altering gene expression in metabolically active tissues[83]. While the exact mechanism remains to be unraveled, it has been shown that genetic variants within the FTO gene are linked functionally to another obesity-related gene called IRX3, which promotes browning of white adipocytes, maybe a connecting link between FTO variants and obesity-related disorders[76,84,85]. Further, previous studies have observed that individuals homozygous for the risk alleles in FTO have impaired metabolic profile[86-88]. Similarly, our findings of the FTO association with MetS score may be related to its association with obesity[89,90], T2DM[91] and/or lipid abnormalities[92,93]. This is supported by the associations we observed between FTO variants and components of the MetS, particularly with WC and SBP. Various candidate gene studies have observed association between FTO variants and MetS in adults[71,73,77,93] across different ethnicities[73,76,93,94]. Our results confirm the association of FTO variants and MetS in children and adolescent populations via its implication in the regulation of body fatness. Though the CETP variant did not survive conservative Bonferroni correction, we observed a strong association of rs708272 with increased HDL (ß = 4.03, p = 5.63 × 10−40) and decreased TRG (ß = −2.43, p = 9.60 × 10−5) levels. Consistent to our observations previous literature has shown that some variants in the CETP gene, an essential protein of reverse cholesterol transport process are associated with decreased plasma CETP protein activity and protein levels, culminating in higher concentrations of HDL[95,96] and reduced concentrations of TRG[13]. Similarly, meta-analyses have shown that carriers of the T allele, associated with lower CETP, have higher HDL concentrations than CC homozygotes[97] and thereby showing an inverse association with MetS. Further, rs708272 of the CETP gene was moderately correlated (r2 = 0.47, MAF = 0.41) with the GWAS-identified SNP rs173539[10], a less common SNP (MAF = 0.30) which could not be detected in the present study given the moderate sample size. We observed a significant association of rs708272 with MetS score after adjusting for BMI z-scores (Supplementary Table 7), suggesting that the association may partly be driven by lipid metabolism in addition to obesity. In-silico examinations of the possible functional significance of SNPs found in our sample suggested that the FTO gene had a CADD C score of over 10 for one SNP. Likewise, the RegulomeDB score of 4 in the FTO gene for three SNPs suggests that transcription factor binding could be impaired by these SNPs., thus indicating that one or more variants in the FTO gene are likely to have a functional effect. Analysis of the eQTL showed that the rs8050136-A allele may upregulate the level of FTO gene expression in the muscle-skeletal tissue. However, to establish the biological function of these variants of susceptibility, more functional work is needed. To further assess whether the MetS score association results vary by sex, we performed stratified analysis. The associations remained significant for both boys and girls with slightly stronger associations observed in boys. This is obvious as MetS is more common in adult males as compared to adult females in Europeans and other high-income countries[98]. A possible explanation could be due to the sex-modulated fat distribution interactions with the dynamics of cardiometabolic risk[99]. In recent years there has been no meta-analysis on the FTO variants and MetS[94,100-102], therefore the present meta-analysis provides an updated overview of the risk associated with variants in 16q12.2 involving data from 38 studies on 80856 participants plus the present IDEFICS/I.Family study. Pooled estimates from the meta-analysis further confirmed our findings for rs8050136, rs1121980, rs1558902, rs9939609, rs1421085 and MetS risk. Again, most of the studies in the meta-analysis were conducted on adults which may not be an appropriate extrapolation to children, given its greater impact in children compared to adults[103]. Strengths of our study include the design (samples derived from a well-phenotyped cohort of children), an accurate and highly standardized outcome measurement, and the ability to include several important covariates. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report common genetic variation conferring MetS risk with longitudinal analysis in children[104]. The study could have benefitted further by in-depth laboratory functional assays, but this was beyond the scope of this paper. We therefore conducted an in-silico functional analysis. Though the study was adequately powered to detect associations with common genetic variations, we couldn’t replicate the previously identified GWAS SNPs conducted in adults, which could be for example attributable to absence of power to detect less common SNPs or SNPs with small effects, to differences in linkage disequilibrium, age group structure or the analytical methods across studies[105]. However, the greater impact of FTO variants in children as compared to adults is well known[106,107], and therefore the association of the FTO variants in childhood MetS etiology, not observed by GWAS of the adult population, implies the involvement of different SNPs at different age groups. In conclusion, the results from the present study along with the comprehensive meta-analysis advance etiologic understanding of childhood MetS, highlight that the genetic predisposition to MetS is largely driven by genes of obesity and lipid metabolism. Future work on functional characterization will further help in understanding the biological underpinnings underlying long-term MetS regulation. Our observation of distinct associations of variants of FTO and CETP for different component traits of MetS in children, suggests devising polygenic scores for MetS which may prove to be fundamental for identifying children and subsequently adults of the high-risk group to allow earlier targeted interventions. Supplementary Information.
  81 in total

Review 1.  Genetic susceptibility to obesity and metabolic syndrome in childhood.

Authors:  Concepción M Aguilera; Josune Olza; Angel Gil
Journal:  Nutr Hosp       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.057

2.  Genome-wide screen for metabolic syndrome susceptibility Loci reveals strong lipid gene contribution but no evidence for common genetic basis for clustering of metabolic syndrome traits.

Authors:  Kati Kristiansson; Markus Perola; Emmi Tikkanen; Johannes Kettunen; Ida Surakka; Aki S Havulinna; Alena Stancáková; Chris Barnes; Elisabeth Widen; Eero Kajantie; Johan G Eriksson; Jorma Viikari; Mika Kähönen; Terho Lehtimäki; Olli T Raitakari; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Aimo Ruokonen; Anneli Pouta; Antti Jula; Antti J Kangas; Pasi Soininen; Mika Ala-Korpela; Satu Männistö; Pekka Jousilahti; Lori L Bonnycastle; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Johanna Kuusisto; Francis S Collins; Markku Laakso; Matthew E Hurles; Aarno Palotie; Leena Peltonen; Samuli Ripatti; Veikko Salomaa
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2012-03-07

3.  Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity.

Authors:  K G M M Alberti; Robert H Eckel; Scott M Grundy; Paul Z Zimmet; James I Cleeman; Karen A Donato; Jean-Charles Fruchart; W Philip T James; Catherine M Loria; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  A bivariate genome-wide approach to metabolic syndrome: STAMPEED consortium.

Authors:  Aldi T Kraja; Dhananjay Vaidya; James S Pankow; Mark O Goodarzi; Themistocles L Assimes; Iftikhar J Kullo; Ulla Sovio; Rasika A Mathias; Yan V Sun; Nora Franceschini; Devin Absher; Guo Li; Qunyuan Zhang; Mary F Feitosa; Nicole L Glazer; Talin Haritunians; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Joshua W Knowles; Kari E North; Carlos Iribarren; Brian Kral; Lisa Yanek; Paul F O'Reilly; Mark I McCarthy; Cashell Jaquish; David J Couper; Aravinda Chakravarti; Bruce M Psaty; Lewis C Becker; Michael A Province; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas Quertermous; Leena Palotie; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Diane M Becker; Sharon L R Kardia; Jerome I Rotter; Yii-Der Ida Chen; Ingrid B Borecki
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 9.461

5.  Association of common variants in JAK2 gene with reduced risk of metabolic syndrome and related disorders.

Authors:  Alberto Penas-Steinhardt; Mariana L Tellechea; Leonardo Gomez-Rosso; Fernando Brites; Gustavo D Frechtel; Edgardo Poskus
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  Polymorphisms in the LPL and CETP Genes and Haplotype in the ESR1 Gene Are Associated with Metabolic Syndrome in Women from Southwestern Mexico.

Authors:  José Ángel Cahua-Pablo; Miguel Cruz; Abigail Méndez-Palacios; Diana Lizzete Antúnez-Ortiz; Amalia Vences-Velázquez; Luz del Carmen Alarcón-Romero; Esteban Juan Parra; Vianet Argelia Tello-Flores; Marco Antonio Leyva-Vázquez; Adán Valladares-Salgado; Claudia Paola Pérez-Macedonio; Eugenia Flores-Alfaro
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Susceptibility loci for metabolic syndrome and metabolic components identified in Han Chinese: a multi-stage genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Yimin Zhu; Dandan Zhang; Dan Zhou; Zhenli Li; Zhiqiang Li; Le Fang; Min Yang; Zhongyan Shan; Hong Li; Jianhua Chen; Xianghai Zhou; Wei Ye; Senhai Yu; Huabin Li; Libin Cai; Chengguo Liu; Jie Zhang; Lixin Wang; Yaxin Lai; Liansheng Ruan; Zhanhang Sun; Shuai Zhang; Hao Wang; Yi Liu; Yuyang Xu; Jie Ling; Chunxiao Xu; Yan Zhang; Duo Lv; Zheping Yuan; Jing Zhang; Yingqi Zhang; Yongyong Shi; Maode Lai
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Cohort Profile: The transition from childhood to adolescence in European children-how I.Family extends the IDEFICS cohort.

Authors:  W Ahrens; A Siani; R Adan; S De Henauw; G Eiben; W Gwozdz; A Hebestreit; M Hunsberger; J Kaprio; V Krogh; L Lissner; D Molnár; L A Moreno; A Page; C Picó; L Reisch; R M Smith; M Tornaritis; T Veidebaum; G Williams; H Pohlabeln; I Pigeot
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Genetic architecture of plasma adiponectin overlaps with the genetics of metabolic syndrome-related traits.

Authors:  Peter Henneman; Yurii S Aulchenko; Rune R Frants; Irina V Zorkoltseva; M Carola Zillikens; Marijke Frolich; Ben A Oostra; Ko Willems van Dijk; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  New Common and Rare Variants Influencing Metabolic Syndrome and Its Individual Components in a Korean Population.

Authors:  Ho-Sun Lee; Yongkang Kim; Taesung Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Association between HindIII (rs320) variant in the lipoprotein lipase gene and the presence of coronary artery disease and stroke among the Saudi population.

Authors:  Neda M Bogari; Ashwag Aljohani; Anas Dannoun; Osama Elkhateeb; Masimo Porqueddu; Amr A Amin; Dema N Bogari; Mohiuddin M Taher; Faruk Buba; Reem M Allam; Mustafa N Bogari; Francesco Alamanni
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 2.  eQTLs as causal instruments for the reconstruction of hormone linked gene networks.

Authors:  Sean Bankier; Tom Michoel
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Genome-wide association analysis of metabolic syndrome quantitative traits in the GENNID multiethnic family study.

Authors:  Jia Y Wan; Deborah L Goodman; Emileigh L Willems; Alexis R Freedland; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Stephanie A Santorico; Karen L Edwards
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.320

Review 4.  Metabolic Syndrome: Updates on Pathophysiology and Management in 2021.

Authors:  Gracia Fahed; Laurence Aoun; Morgan Bou Zerdan; Sabine Allam; Maroun Bou Zerdan; Youssef Bouferraa; Hazem I Assi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Mediterranean Diet and Genetic Determinants of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in European Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Miguel Seral-Cortes; Alicia Larruy-García; Pilar De Miguel-Etayo; Idoia Labayen; Luis A Moreno
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.