| Literature DB >> 22185674 |
Alberto Penas-Steinhardt1, Mariana L Tellechea, Leonardo Gomez-Rosso, Fernando Brites, Gustavo D Frechtel, Edgardo Poskus.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disturbances in leptin and insulin signaling pathways are related to obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) with increased risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) is a tyrosine kinase involved in the activation of mechanisms that mediate leptin and insulin actions. We conducted a population cross-sectional study to explore the association between two common variants in JAK2 gene and MS related traits in 724 Argentinean healthy male subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22185674 PMCID: PMC3259043 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Clinical characteristics of the sample
| Mean | SD | Phenotype | Prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 37.11 | 10.91 | HTG | 31.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.20 | 4.40 | HW | 27.8 |
| WC (cm) | 96.15 | 12.26 | Decreased HDL-C | 45.6 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 126.29 | 11.02 | Abdominal obesity | 31.3 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.11 | 7.38 | Obesity | 29.3 |
| TC (mg/dl) | 187.45 | 40.75 | IFG | 18.0 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 118.52 | 34.89 | MS | 24.1 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 41.25 | 10.66 | ||
| TG (mg/dl) | 138.77 | 95.97 | ||
| LAP | 52.74 | 6.72 | ||
| TG/HDL-C | 3.86 | 3.73 | ||
| FPG (mg/dl) | 91.87 | 12.23 | ||
| Fasting insulin | 16.18 | 9.27 | ||
| HOMA-IR | 2.07 | 1.16 |
n = 724. DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; HW, hypertriglyceridemic waist; IR, insulin resistance; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; LAP = lipid accumulation product; WC, waist circumference; HTG = Hypertriglyceridemia; HW = hypertriglyceridemic waist; IFG = impaired fasting glucosa; MS = metabolic syndrome
Association between individual JAK2 SNPs, Metabolic Syndrome and related phenotypes
| MS negative | MS positive | OR (IC 95%) | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT vs. TC vs. CC | 69 vs. 241 vs. 226 | 38 vs. 76 vs. 57 | - | 0.009 | ns | ns |
| CC + CT vs. TT | 467 vs. 69 | 133 vs. 38 | 0.517 (0.333-0.803) | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| CC vs. CT + TT | 226 vs. 310 | 57 vs. 114 | 0.686 (0.478-0.984) | 0.048 | 0.011 | 0.034 |
| TT vs. TC vs. CC | 149 vs. 269 vs. 121 | 33 vs. 83 vs. 57 | - | 0.008 | 0.002 | ns (0.096) |
| TT +TC vs. CC | 418 vs. 121 | 116 vs. 57 | 0.589 (0.404-0.858) | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| TT vs. TC+ CC | 149 vs. 390 | 33 vs. 140 | 0.617 (0.404-0.942) | 0.027 | 0.020 | 0.022 |
| TT vs. TC vs. CC | 139 vs. 250 vs. 108 | 48 vs.108 vs. 71 | - | 0.013 | 0.006 | ns (0.082) |
| TT +TC vs. CC | 389 vs. 108 | 136 vs. 71 | 0.610 (0.429-0.868) | 0.007 | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| TT vs. TC+ CC | 139 vs. 358 | 48 vs. 179 | - | ns | ns | |
| TT vs. TC vs. CC | 145 vs. 257 vs. 118 | 41 vs.101 vs. 61 | - | 0.037 | 0.021 | ns (0.082) |
| TT +TC vs. CC | 402 vs. 118 | 142 vs. 61 | 0.683 (0.475-0.983) | 0.044 | 0.016 | ns (0.07) |
| TT vs. TC+ CC | 145 vs. 375 | 41 vs. 172 | 0.655 (0.442-0.969) | 0.037 | 0.033 | ns (0.05) |
a Age adjusted; b Age and BMI adjusted. MS = metabolic syndrome; HTG = Hypertriglyceridemia; HW = hypertriglyceridemic waist; ns = not significant.
Single locus analysis of quantitative metabolic traits and surrogate measures of IR
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | p | pa | pb | |
| 120.61 ± 67.76 | 144.04 ± 104.745 | 150.17 ± 106.38 | 0.001 c | ns | ns | |
| 3.27 ± 2.60 | 3.99 ± 3.84 | 4.39 ± 4.68 | 0.004 c | ns | ns | |
| 44.42 ± 37.72 | 54.58 ± 49.32 | 58.89 ± 50.77 | 0.003 c | ns | ns | |
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | p | pa | pb | ||
| 120.61 ± 67.76 | 146.09 ± 105.23 | 0.00017 c | 0.006 | 0.009 | ||
| 3.27 ± 2.60 | 4.13 ± 4.13 | 0.001 c | 0.008 | 0.011 | ||
| 44.42 ± 37.72 | 56.00 ± 49.80 | 0.0011 c | 0.004 | 0.006 |
rs3780378 recessive model. ANOVA was performed for normal-distributed data and Welch otherwise. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to adjust for possible confounding variables. Linear regression analysis was performed with log transformed values for phenotypes deviating from normality. LAP = lipid accumulation product. c= Welch p value. a Age adjusted; b Age and BMI adjusted.