| Literature DB >> 21398525 |
Jens K Hertel1, Stefan Johansson, Emily Sonestedt, Anna Jonsson, Rolv T Lie, Carl G P Platou, Peter M Nilsson, Gull Rukh, Kristian Midthjell, Kristian Hveem, Olle Melander, Leif Groop, Valeriya Lyssenko, Anders Molven, Marju Orho-Melander, Pål R Njølstad.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: FTO is the most important polygene identified for obesity. We aimed to investigate whether a variant in FTO affects type 2 diabetes risk entirely through its effect on BMI and how FTO influences BMI across adult life span. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Through regression models, we assessed the relationship between the FTO single nucleotide polymorphisms rs9939609, type 2 diabetes, and BMI across life span in subjects from the Norwegian population-based HUNT study using cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. For replication and meta-analysis, we used data from the Malmö Diet and Cancer (MDC) and Malmö Preventive Project (MPP) cohorts, comprising a total sample of 41,504 Scandinavians.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21398525 PMCID: PMC3292341 DOI: 10.2337/db10-1340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes ISSN: 0012-1797 Impact factor: 9.461
Clinical characteristics of the individuals from the three different cohorts
| HUNT | MPP | MDC | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Type 2 diabetes | No type 2 diabetes | All | Type 2 diabetes | Type 2 diabetes | All | Type 2 diabetes | Type 2 diabetes | ||||||||||
| Individuals ( | 5,596 | — | 1,543 | — | 4,053 | — | 15,930 | — | 2,054 | — | 13,876 | — | 19,978 | — | 720 | — | 19,258 | — |
| Sex (male/female) | 5,596 | 2,788/2,808 | 1,543 | 726/817 | 4,053 | 2,062/1,991 | 15,930 | 10,335/5,595 | 2,054 | 1,604/450 | 13,876 | 8,731/5,145 | 19,978 | 6,529/13,449 | 720 | 364/356 | 19,258 | 6,165/13,093 |
| Age (years) | 5,596 | 59.8 ± 17.1 | 1,543 | 67.9 ± 12.0 | 4,053 | 56.7 ± 17.8 | 15,930 | 45.5 ± 6.9 | 2,054 | 45.0 ± 6.3 | 13,876 | 45.6 ± 7.0 | 19,978 | 57.7 ± 8.4 | 720 | 61.3 ± 7.3 | 19,258 | 57.6 ± 8.5 |
| Follow-up time (years) | 4,625 | 10 | 1421 | 10 | 3,204 | 10 | 15,930 | 23.5 ± 4.2 | 2,054 | 24.5 ± 3.4 | 13,876 | 23.4 ± 4.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BMI baseline (kg/m2) | 4,625 | 26.8 ± 4.4 | 1,421 | 29.5 ± 4.8 | 3,204 | 25.6 ± 3.7 | 15,925 | 24.3 ± 3.3 | 2,054 | 26.2 ± 3.8 | 13,871 | 24.0 ± 3.1 | 19,978 | 25.8 ± 4.1 | 720 | 28.1 ± 4.7 | 19,258 | 25.7 ± 4.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 5,596 | 27.3 ± 4.6 | 1543 | 29.3 ± 4.8 | 4,053 | 26.6 ± 4.1 | 15,843 | 27.1 ± 4.1 | 2,038 | 29.3 ± 4.6 | 13,805 | 26.8 ± 3.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Waist-to-hip ratio | 5,552 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 1,530 | 0.89 ± 0.1 | 4,022 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 15,820 | 0.92 ± 0.1 | 2,030 | 0.97 ± 0.1 | 13,790 | 0.91 ± 0.1 | 19,959 | 0.85 ± 0.1 | 717 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 19,242 | 0.84 ± 0.1 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 5,552 | 90.3 ± 12.2 | 1,530 | 95.8 ± 11.8 | 4,022 | 88.2 ± 11.6 | 15,829 | 94.8 ± 12.2 | 2,030 | 102.1 ± 12.1 | 13,799 | 93.7 ± 11.8 | 19,963 | 83.5 ± 13.2 | 718 | 93.4 ± 13.8 | 19,245 | 83.2 ± 13.0 |
| Serum triglycerides (mmol/L) | 5,583 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 1,534 | 2.5 ± 1.6 | 4,049 | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 15,921 | 1.3 ± 0.8 | 2,052 | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 13,869 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 3,228 | 1.4 ± 0.9 | 124 | 2.2 ± 1.5 | 3,104 | 1.4 ± 0.8 |
| Serum cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5,584 | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 1,534 | 6.2 ± 1.3 | 4,050 | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 15,923 | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 2,052 | 5.2 ± 1.1 | 13,871 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 3,229 | 6.2 ± 1.1 | 124 | 6.2 ± 1.0 | 3,105 | 6.2 ± 1.1 |
| Serum HDL (mmol/L) | 5,582 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 1,533 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 4,049 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 15,915 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 2,052 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 13,863 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 3,188 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 119 | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 3,069 | 1.4 ± 0.4 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5,582 | 6.8 ± 3.3 | 1,533 | 9.6 ± 4.2 | 4,049 | 5.7 ± 1.9 | 15,921 | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 2,050 | 7.9 ± 2.4 | 13,871 | 5.5 ± 0.5 | 3,228 | 6.0 ± 1.9 | 125 | 12.3 ± 4.7 | 3,103 | 5.7 ± 1.0 |
Data are presented as means ± SD. Data presented for the HUNT and MPP cohorts are follow-up measures unless otherwise stated. All data presented for the MDC cohort are baseline measures as a result of no available follow-up measures.
*Only nonfasting glucose measures were available for participants in the HUNT cohort.
FIG. 1.Meta-analysis plots of association between FTO and type 2 diabetes comprising 4,317 subjects with type 2 diabetes and 37,187 control subjects. A: Meta-analysis plot of association between FTO rs9939609 and type 2 diabetes after correction for age and sex (allelic OR 1.13 [95%CI 1.08–1.19]). B: Meta-analysis plot of association between FTO rs9939609 and type 2 diabetes after correction for age, sex, and BMI (allelic OR 1.09 [ 1.04–1.15]). We observed a tendency toward heterogeneity between the samples (P = 0.064), and the variation in the estimate attributable to heterogeneity was calculated to 63.7%. The ORs for the overall estimates were calculated using a fixed-effect model with inverse variance. The weighting (%weight) represents the inverse variance of each studies’ effect estimator.
FIG. 2.Meta-analysis plot of the FTO-associated allele-wise effect on BMI using cross-sectional data. The results included in the meta-analysis are from regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes status. The weighting (%weight) represents the inverse variance of each study’s effect estimator. A: Meta-analysis plot comprising all 41,504 individuals. No heterogeneity between the cohorts was detected (P = 0.242), and the overall allelic effect was estimated to 0.28 kg/m2. B: Meta-analysis plot comprising all 41,504 individuals stratified on 10-year age strata. No heterogeneity between the subgroups was detected (P = 0.378). Moderate heterogeneity was, however, observed in two of the subgroups.
FIG. 3.Meta-analysis plot of the FTO-associated effect on BMI differences using longitudinal data from the HUNT and MPP study. The results included in the meta-analysis are from regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and diabetes status. The weighting (%weight) represents the inverse variance of each study’s effect estimator. A: Meta-analysis plot comprising all 20,464 individuals with follow-up data on BMI. No heterogeneity between the cohorts was detected (P = 0.892), and the overall allelic effect for the FTO SNP on BMI difference over a period of time was estimated to 0 kg/m2. B: Meta-analysis plot comprising all 20,464 individuals stratified on 10-year age strata. Each age stratum reflects the age at baseline. No heterogeneity between the subgroups was detected (P = 0.967). Moderate heterogeneity was, however, observed in two of the subgroups.