| Literature DB >> 32283682 |
Yang Chen1, Arya Xinran Huang2, Ilona Faber1, Guido Makransky3, Federico J A Perez-Cueto1.
Abstract
This study was designed to assess whether the combined effect of taste-congruent and incongruent extrinsic visual cues presented in virtual reality (VR) influences the perception of sweetness and product liking. Three VR environments (sweet-congruent, sweet-incongruent, and neutral) were created based on the evidence in existing literature. Participants tasted the same beverage in three VR environments and evaluated the environment and beverage liking, as well as perceived taste intensity (sweetness, sourness, and bitterness), congruency, comfort, and environment vividness. Frontal EEG alpha asymmetry (FAA) was also recorded as a complementary physiological measurement of overall liking. The results showed that the perceived sweetness of the beverage was significantly elevated in a sweet-congruent environment versus the other environments. Visual-taste congruency did not seem to have an effect on beverage liking and overall liking, whereas an increase in environment liking was found in the incongruent environment versus the other environments. These findings confirmed the significant influence of taste-specific visual cues on flavour perception, while the successful use of VR in the study provided insight into future applications of taste-specific VR environment in the modulation of flavour perception and sugar reduction.Entities:
Keywords: frontal alpha asymmetry; sweetness perception; virtual reality; visual cues
Year: 2020 PMID: 32283682 PMCID: PMC7230737 DOI: 10.3390/foods9040465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Overall experimental procedures.
Figure 2Three VR environments used in the study. (A) Sweet environment; (B) Bitter environment; and (C) Neutral environment.
Figure 3Association between four tastes and (A) sweet environment; (B) bitter environment; and (C) neutral environment (in terms of %).
Figure 4Participants’ rating on (A) visual-taste congruency and (B) intensity of sweetness, sourness, and bitterness in three VR environments (mean ± SEM). * indicates p < 0.05.
Effect of visual-taste congruency on perceived tastes, liking, congruency, comfort, and environment vividness in terms of degrees of freedom, F value, p-value, and effect size.
|
| F | η2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bitterness | 2 | 0.155 | 0.857 | 0.003 |
| Sourness | 2 | 0.002 | 0.998 | <0.0005 |
| Beverage liking | 2 | 0.563 | 0.571 | 0.009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FAA | 2 | 0.563 | 0.571 | 0.009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vividness | 2 | 2.240 | 0.111 | 0.036 |
| Comfort | 2 | 1.041 | 0.356 | 0.017 |
Significant effects (p < 0.05) are shown in bold.
Average ratings with standard deviation and standard error per visual environment.
| ENVIRONMENT | MEAN(SD) | SEM | COMPARISON | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWEETNESS | Sweet | 2.42(1.31) | 0.21 | A |
| Bitter | 1.27(1.34) | 0.21 | B | |
| Neutral | 1.61(1.12) | 0.17 | AB | |
| BITTERNESS | Sweet | −3.32(1.29) | 0.2 | A |
| Bitter | −3.17(1.12) | 0.17 | A | |
| Neutral | −3.24(1.16) | 0.18 | A | |
| SOURNESS | Sweet | −2.07(2.07) | 0.32 | A |
| Bitter | −2.05(1.90) | 0.29 | A | |
| Neutral | −2.05(2.12) | 0.33 | A | |
| BEVERAGE LIKING | Sweet | 1.29(1.72) | 0.27 | A |
| Bitter | 0.9(1.77) | 0.28 | A | |
| Neutral | 1.12(1.53) | 0.24 | A | |
| ENVIRONMENT LIKING | Sweet | 1.39 (1.63) | 0.25 | A |
| Bitter | 0.29 (1.60) | 0.25 | B | |
| Neutral | 0.34 (1.44) | 0.23 | AB | |
| FAA | Sweet | −0.01(0.07) | 0.01 | A |
| Bitter | 0.01(0.07) | 0.01 | A | |
| Neutral | 0.00(0.07) | 0.01 | A | |
| CONGRUENCY | Sweet | 1.90(1.90) | 0.31 | A |
| Bitter | −0.83(2.40) | 0.37 | B | |
| Neutral | −0.10(1.89) | 0.29 | B | |
| VIVIDNESS | Sweet | 1.39(1.75) | 0.27 | A |
| Bitter | 0.80(1.78) | 0.28 | A | |
| Neutral | 0.59(1.82) | 0.28 | A | |
| COMFORT | Sweet | 2.39(1.24) | 0.19 | A |
| Bitter | 2.07(1.69) | 0.27 | A | |
| Neutral | 1.93(1.49) | 0.23 | A |
Pearson correlation coefficients between environment liking, beverage liking, overall liking (FAA), and congruency in (A) the sweet environment, (B) the bitter environment, and (C) the neutral environment.
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Congruency | 1.0 | 0.12 | 0.47 ** | −0.01 |
| Beverage liking | - | 1.0 | 0.30 * | −0.08 |
| Environment liking | - | - | 1.0 | −0.34 |
| FAA | - | - | - | 1.0 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Congruency | 1.0 | 0.25 | 0.45 ** | −0.24 |
| Beverage liking | - | 1.0 | 0.40 * | −0.21 |
| Environment liking | - | - | 1.0 | −0.1 |
| FAA | - | - | - | 1.0 |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| |
| Congruency | 1.0 | 0.16 | 0.18 * | −0.14 |
| Beverage liking | - | 1.0 | 0.31 * | −0.38 |
| Environment liking | - | - | 1.0 | −0.17 |
* Indicates significance at the 0.05 level and ** indicates significance at the 0.01 level.
Gender difference between environment liking, beverage liking, and perceived sweetness intensity in (A) the sweet environment, (B) the bitter environment and (C) the neutral environment.
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Male | 1(−0.5,2) | 2(1,2.5) | 2(2,4) |
| Female | 2(0,3) | 1(0,3) | 3(2,3) |
| Z | −1.515 | −0.890 | −0.027 |
| P | 0.130 | 0.373 | 0.978 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Male | 0(−1,0.5) | 1(−0.5,3) | 1(1,2) |
| Female | 0(−1,2) | 1(0,2) | 1.5(1,2) |
| Z | −0.860 | −0.526 | −0.125 |
| P | 0.390 | 0.599 | 0.901 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Male | 1(−1,2) | 2(1,2) | 1(−1,2) |
| Female | 0(0,1) | 2(1,2.75) | 0(0,1) |
| Z | −0.464 | −0.411 | −0.464 |
| P | 0.642 | 0.681 | 0.642 |