| Literature DB >> 32253542 |
Lucian Beer1, Hilal Sahin1, Erich Huang2, Evis Sala3,4, Nicholas W Bateman5,6, Ivana Blazic7, Hebert Alberto Vargas8, Harini Veeraraghavan9, Justin Kirby10, Brenda Fevrier-Sullivan10, John B Freymann10, C Carl Jaffe11, James Brenton12,13, Maura Miccó14, Stephanie Nougaret15, Kathleen M Darcy5,6, G Larry Maxwell5,6,16, Thomas P Conrads5,6,16,17.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between CT imaging traits and texture metrics with proteomic data in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).Entities:
Keywords: Gene expression profiling; Ovarian neoplasms; Prognosis; Proteomics; Radiomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32253542 PMCID: PMC7338824 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06755-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Fig. 1Study flow chart. Patients analyzed in this study were part of the TCGA dataset (n = 169). Protein candidates (5504 total) that exhibited stable expression between primary and metastatic sites and those that highly correlated with transcript abundance (n = 107 HGSOC patients, TCGA, and CPTAC) were selected using the Student’s t test (p value < 0.1) after boxCox normalization of transcript expression coefficients of variation and Spearman correlation distributions, respectively. Forty-seven genes exhibited both low correlation of variables between primary and metastatic sites (529 candidates) and were highly correlated at the protein and transcript levels (569 candidates). Among those, 16 proteins were associated with amino acid metabolism and selected for final analysis. CT data were available in 20 patients. Thirty-three radiologist-scored imaging traits and three CT-based texture measures of inter-site tumor heterogeneity were assessed and their correlation with the 16 cancer proteins was calculated
Fig. 2Overview of the experimental workflow. For each patient, 33 imaging traits, proteomics from a single-site tumor biopsy, as well as intra- and inter-site tumor heterogeneity texture measures, were obtained. The 33 imaging traits and measures of intra- and inter-site heterogeneity were correlated with proteomic data
The CT-based image features used in this study, with possible values, summary statistics and inter-reader agreement
| Feature | Possible values and summary statistics | Inter-reader agreement (%); Cohen’s kappa |
|---|---|---|
| Disease in mesentery | Yes: 50% (10/20) No: 50% (10/20) | 95%; 0.90 |
| Peritoneal disease in paracolic gutters | Yes: 80% (16/20) No: 20% (4/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Peritoneal disease in Pouch of Douglas | Yes: 75% (15/20) No: 25% (5/20) | 85%; 0.57 |
| Peritoneal disease in spleen/left upper quadrant | Yes: 85% (17/20) No: 15% (3/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Peritoneal disease in lesser sac | Yes: 30% (6/20) No: 70% (14/20) | 90%; 0.76 |
| Peritoneal disease in liver/right upper quadrant | Yes: 70% (14/20) No: 30% (6/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Number of locations with peritoneal disease | 0: 10% (2/20) 1: 5% (1/20) 2: 5% (1/20) 3: 5% (1/20) 4: 30% (6/20) 5: 20% (4/20) 6: 25% (5/20) | 90%; 0.62 |
| Peritoneal disease calcifications | Yes: 5% (1/20) No: 95% (19/20) | 95%; N/A |
| Peritoneal disease omental implant | Yes: 95% (19/20) No: 5% (1/20) | 90%; 0.5 |
| Shape of peritoneal disease | Diffuse: 15% (3/20) Predominantly diffuse: 50% (10/20) Predominantly nodular: 30% (6/20) Nodular: 0% (0/20) Peritoneal enhancement only: 0% (0/20) No peritoneal disease: 5% (1/20) | 90%; 0.71 |
| Infrarenal retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy | Yes: 30% (6/20) No: 70% (14/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Pelvic lymphadenopathy | Yes: 15% (3/20) No: 85% (17/20) | 95%; 0.77 |
| Inguinal lymphadenopathy | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Porta/celiac/gastro lymphadenopathy | Yes: 25% (5/20) No: 75% (15/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Retrocrural lymphadenopathy | Yes: 5% (1/20) No: 95% (19/20) | 95%; N/A |
| Supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy | Yes: 45% (9/20) No: 55% (11/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Thoracic lymphadenopathy | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Number of locations with lymphadenopathy | 0: 45% (9/20) 1: 15% (3/20) 2: 20% (4/20) 3: 5% (1/20) 4: 15% (3/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Metastases in liver | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Metastases in lung | Yes: 5% (1/20) No: 95% (19/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Metastases in pleura | Yes: 10% (2/20) No: 90% (18/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Metastases in spleen | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Metastases in other locations | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Number of locations with metastases | 0: 85% (17/20) 1: 15% (3/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Metastases calcifications | Yes: 0% (0/20) No: 100% (20/20) | 100%; N/A |
| Size of pleural effusions | No pleural effusions: 65% (13/20) Small: 20% (4/20) Moderate/Large: 15% (3/20) | 95%; 0.91 |
| Pleural metastases removed | Pleural effusion: 5% (1/20) [NA]: 95% (19/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Pleural effusion metastases removed | Small: 5% (1/20) [NA]: 95% (19/20) | 100%; 1.0 |
| Size of ascites | No ascites: 15% (3/20) Trace or small: 40% (8/20) Moderate or large: 35% (9/20) | 95%; 0.92 |
| Mass laterality | No mass: 10% (2/20) Left: 5% (1/20) Right: 5% (1/20) Bilateral: 85% (16/20) | 90%; 0.73 |
| Mass calcifications | Yes: 10% (2/20) No: 90% (18/20) | 95%; 0.64 |
| Mass septations | Yes: 10% (2/20) No: 90% (18/20) | 90%; N/A |
| Mass internal architecture | Cystic: 0% (0/20) Predominantly cystic: 0% (0/20) Mixed: 35% (7/20) Predominantly solid: 55% (11/20) Solid: 10% (2/20) | 75%; 0.38 |
| Length of largest lesion | Median: 63 mm Range: 24 mm to 116 mm | N/A |
N/A, not applicable. Inter-reader agreement is shown as absolute agreement and Cohen’s kappa statistics for the two radiologists. In case of disagreement, a third radiologist acted as arbitrator. In case one or both readers scored all cases the same value, we were not able to calculate kappa values
The texture features used in this study, with summary statistics
| Feature | Distribution |
|---|---|
| Cluster site entropy | Median: 3.724 Range: 2.170 to 4.969 |
| Cluster standard deviation | Median: 2.271 Range: 0.241 to 13.32 |
| Cluster dissimilarity | Median: 4394 Range: 483.8 to 15,857 |
Clinical characteristics of the 20 patients used in the analysis
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Median age (year) | 60.5 (49–80) |
| FIGO stage III | 8 (40%) |
| FIGO stage IV | 12 (60%) |
| Residual disease following primary debulking | |
| None | 5 (25%) |
| Less than 1 cm | 11 (55%) |
| Greater than 1 cm | 3 (15%) |
| No. of patients with missing data | 1 (5%) |
| Median TTP (day) | 426 (9–1475) |
| Median OS | 1469 (9–2749) |
Age, TTP, and OS are shown as median (range), while the remaining variables are shown as number of patients; TTP, time to progression; OS, overall survival
Fig. 3Tumor volume of the sub-regions of the 20 patients included in the final analysis is shown. LUQ, left upper quadrant: the horizontal line indicates the median value
Associations between protein abundance and CT-based imaging traits previously found to be prognostic in patients with HGSOC. Only associations for which the p value was less than 0.05 were included in this table. AUC values greater than 0.5 indicate a positive association between the imaging trait and the level of expression of the protein whereas AUC values less than 0.5 indicate a negative association. Positive values of τ indicate positive association between the imaging trait and the level of expression of the protein whereas negative values of indicate negative association
| Image trait | Protein | Corr. | Point estimate of metric of association | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease in mesentery | CRIP2 | 0.0002 | 0.03 | AUC = 0.05 |
| GPI | 0.04 | 0.51 | AUC = 0.22 | |
| Supradiaphragmatic lymphadenopathy | ALDH3A2 | 0.02 | 0.45 | AUC = 0.192 |
| MAGEA4 | 0.046 | 0.52 | AUC = 0.768 | |
| Number of sites with peritoneal disease | ALDH3A2 | 0.03 | 0.51 | |
| CRIP2 | 0.01 | 0.29 | ||
| Shape of peritoneal disease | MAGEA4 | 0.04 | 0.52 |
Association between CT-based texture metrics and protein abundance in patients with HGSOC. Only associations for which the p value was less than 0.05 were included in this table. Positive values of τ indicate positive association between the texture metric and the level of expression of the protein whereas negative values of τ indicate negative association
| Texture feature | Protein | Corr. | Point estimate of metric of association | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster site entropy | ASS1 | 0.03 | 0.45 | |
| STXBP2 | 0.007 | 0.28 | ||
| Cluster standard deviation | STXBP2 | 0.005 | 0.20 | |
| Cluster dissimilarity | ASS1 | 0.009 | 0.29 | |
| CKB | 0.047 | 0.52 | ||
| STXBP2 | 0.03 | 0.45 |