| Literature DB >> 27997533 |
Christine A Parkinson1,2,3,4,5, Davina Gale1,5, Anna M Piskorz1,5, Heather Biggs2,3,5, Charlotte Hodgkin2,5, Helen Addley4,5, Sue Freeman4,5, Penelope Moyle4,5, Evis Sala4, Karen Sayal1, Karen Hosking2,3,5, Ioannis Gounaris1,5, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan4,5, Helena M Earl2,3,4,5, Wendi Qian4,5, Nitzan Rosenfeld1,5, James D Brenton1,2,3,4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) carrying tumour-specific sequence alterations may provide a minimally invasive means to dynamically assess tumour burden and response to treatment in cancer patients. Somatic TP53 mutations are a defining feature of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). We tested whether these mutations could be used as personalised markers to monitor tumour burden and early changes as a predictor of response and time to progression (TTP). METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27997533 PMCID: PMC5172526 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002198
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Med ISSN: 1549-1277 Impact factor: 11.069
Fig 1Schema of workflow for circulating tumour DNA analysis.
ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; FFPE, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease.
Summary statistics.
| Feature | Value |
|---|---|
| 40 | |
| 63 (38–85) | |
| Ovarian | 32 |
| Primary peritoneal | 5 |
| Fallopian tube | 3 |
| I | 3 |
| II | 0 |
| III | 27 |
| IV | 10 |
| TP53MAF, median (IQR) | 0.7% (0.3%–2.0%) |
| CA-125, median (IQR) (IU/ml) | 964 (488–2,909) |
| Volume, median (IQR) (cm3) | 418 (172–1,770) |
| TP53MAF, median (IQR) | 8% (1.2%–22%) |
| CA-125, median (IQR) (IU/ml) | 422 (205–1,108) |
| Volume, median (IQR) (cm3) | 93.5 (37.0–176.0) |
IQR, interquartile range; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction.
Fig 2Comparison of TP53 mutant allele fraction to tumour volume.
(A) Example of volumetric analysis of high-grade serous ovarian cancer with relapsed disease in abdominal lymph nodes. Left panel shows cross-sectional view. Right panel shows 3-D reconstruction to show disease volume. Green shading indicates regions of interest for volume measurements. Lymph node masses are indicated by arrowheads and labelled as follows: AC, aorto-caval; CI, common iliac; PA, para-aortic; RC, retro-caval. (B) Ranked total volume of tumour at start of treatment course. Filled circles indicate cases with TP53MAC ≥ 20 AC/ml. Arrow indicates tumour volume of 32 cm3. (C and D) Linear regression analysis of TP53MAF and CA-125 with tumour volume in 22 relapsed events without ascites. Grey shading shows 95% confidence intervals. (E and F) Comparison of TP53MAF and CA-125 values adjusted for tumour volume between relapsed and newly diagnosed patients before treatment. (G) Time to progression analysis for relapsed patients with greater or less than the median pre-treatment TP53MAF. ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; HR, hazard ratio; ND, not detected; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction.
Univariable and multivariable analysis of pre-treatment values as a predictor of time to progression.
| Variable (Units), | Univariable | Multivariable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | CI | HR | CI | |||
| TP53MAF (percent) | 1.04 | 1.02–1.06 | <0.001 | 1.03 | 1.01–1.06 | 0.019 |
| CA-125 (102 IU/ml) | 1.02 | 1.00–1.05 | 0.078 | 1.01 | 0.98–1.04 | 0.567 |
| TP53TAC (103 copies/ml) | 1.03 | 1.01–1.04 | 0.009 | 1.02 | 1.00–1.05 | 0.079 |
| Age (years) | 0.96 | 0.93–1.00 | 0.030 | 0.96 | 0.92–1.01 | 0.089 |
| Performance status (0–2) | 0.72 | 0.44–1.18 | 0.192 | 0.64 | 0.36–1.17 | 0.146 |
| Platinum sensitive (yes/no) | 0.35 | 0.18–0.68 | 0.002 | 0.43 | 0.19–0.99 | 0.048 |
| Number of lines chemotherapy (2 lines/≥3 lines) | 0.43 | 0.22–0.83 | 0.013 | 0.75 | 0.35–1.64 | 0.478 |
| Volume of disease (10 cm3) | 1.02 | 1.01–1.03 | 0.002 | 1.00 | 0.98–1.02 | 0.786 |
| Ascites (no/yes) | 0.95 | 0.53–1.71 | 0.858 | 0.82 | 0.42–1.58 | 0.548 |
For variables with HR > 1, an increase in the value is associated with a higher risk or number of events, and a decreased TTP. For binary variables, the HR listed is for the first option, with the second option being HR = 1 (if the HR listed is <1 then the first option is associated with lower risk and longer TTP).
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001.
CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction; TP53TAC, TP53 total allele count; TTP, time to progression.
Fig 3Circulating tumour DNA and CA-125 kinetics during chemotherapy.
(A) TP53MAF and CA-125 kinetics from start of treatment, normalised to the pre-treatment levels. Asterisk denotes one treatment course where the patient developed new brain metastases. Yellow circles and blue boxes indicate nadir points. (B) Box plots show time to nadir following start of chemotherapy for CA-125 and TP53MAF. (C–F) Illustrative cases of TP53MAF and CA-125 kinetics. (C) Faster time to nadir and greater dynamic range of TP53MAF compared with CA-125. (D) Discrepant TP53MAF and CA-125 kinetics. This patient commenced on third-line chemotherapy and had a minor response on CT (stable disease by RECIST). CA-125 fell slightly whilst TP53MAF increased. After cycle 4, the patient developed new headaches, and a CT scan showed new brain metastases (marked by asterisk). (E) Discrepant TP53MAF and CA-125 kinetics. This patient commenced third-line chemotherapy, and the TP53MAF and CA-125 values diverged. CT scan showed progressive disease, in keeping with rise of TP53MAF. (F) The effect of ascitic drainage on plasma TP53MAF levels. This patient had an ascitic drain (at time = 4 d) before starting chemotherapy, with a ctDNA sample taken before (time = 0 d) and after (time = 29 d) the ascitic drain. Following drainage of 8 l of ascites, and before start of any further treatment, TP53MAF fell from 7.5% to 3.3%. CA-125 decreased from 86 IU/ml to 46 IU/ml. This patient had small-volume (1 cm3) solid disease and large-volume ascites. CA-125, cancer antigen 125; ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; PD, progressive disease; PLD, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction.
Fig 4ROC curves and Kaplan-Meier plots for change in circulating tumour DNA after one cycle of chemotherapy, including and excluding courses with recent ascitic drains.
(A) ROC plot identifies 60% decrease in TP53MAF as the most accurate threshold for predicting 6-mo TTP in all patients. (B) Kaplan-Meier curve showing TTP for patients with decrease of ≤60% or >60% after one cycle of chemotherapy. (C) ROC plot identifies a 60% decrease in TP53MAF as the most accurate threshold for predicting 6-mo TTP in patients without ascitic drains. (D) Kaplan-Meier curve for TP53MAF decrease after one cycle of chemotherapy to predict 6-mo progression-free survival in patients without ascitic drains. ctDNA, circulating tumour DNA; HR, hazard ratio; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction; TTP, time to progression.
Univariable and multivariable analysis of 60% decrease in TP53 mutant allele fraction after one cycle of chemotherapy as a predictor of time to progression.
| Variable (Units), | Univariable | Multivariable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | CI | HR | CI | |||
| TP53MAF decrease > 60% from C1 to C2 (yes/no) | 0.22 | 0.09–0.52 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.07–0.67 | 0.008 |
| CA-125 decrease > 50% from C1 to C2 (yes/no) | 0.58 | 0.23–1.43 | 0.234 | 0.86 | 0.28–2.71 | 0.802 |
| Age (years) | 1.00 | 0.95–1.04 | 0.841 | 0.97 | 0.91–1.03 | 0.276 |
| Performance status (0–2) | 0.78 | 0.35–1.76 | 0.549 | 0.74 | 0.29–1.87 | 0.522 |
| Platinum sensitive (yes/no) | 0.49 | 0.23–1.02 | 0.057 | 0.65 | 0.25–1.66 | 0.365 |
| Number of lines chemotherapy (2 lines/≥3 lines) | 0.53 | 0.24–1.16 | 0.114 | 0.92 | 0.30–2.81 | 0.888 |
| Volume of disease (10 cm3) | 1.02 | 1.00–1.03 | 0.031 | 1.00 | 0.98–1.02 | 0.999 |
| Ascites (no/yes) | 1.36 | 0.66–2.82 | 0.409 | 1.76 | 0.75–4.16 | 0.197 |
For variables with HR > 1, an increase in the value is associated with a higher risk or number of events, and a decreased TTP. For binary variables, the HR listed is for the first option, with the second option being HR = 1 (if the HR listed is <1 then the first option is associated with lower risk and longer TTP).
* p < 0.05
** p < 0.01
*** p < 0.001.
C1, cycle 1; C2, cycle 2; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction; TTP, time to progression.
Sensitivity and specificity of a decrease in TP53 mutant allele fraction and CA-125 for predicting 6-mo time to progression following one cycle of chemotherapy.
| Predictor | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | Negative Predictive Value (95% CI) | Positive Predictive Value (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All ( | 71% (42%–92%) | 88% (64%–99%) | 79% (54%–94%) | 83% (52%–98%) |
| Excluding drains ( | 75% (43%–95%) | 100% (74%–100%) | 80% (52%–96%) | 100% (66%–100%) |
| All ( | 93% (66%–100%) | 29% (10%–56%) | 83% (36%–100%) | 52% (31%–72%) |
| Excluding drains ( | 92% (62%–100%) | 33% (9%–65%) | 80% (28%–99%) | 58% (34%–80%) |
*One course of chemotherapy was excluded from the sensitivity/specificity analysis for 6-mo time to progression since it was censored before 6 mo.
CI, confidence interval; TP53MAF, TP53 mutant allele fraction.