Hebert Alberto Vargas1, Harini Veeraraghavan2, Maura Micco3, Stephanie Nougaret3,4,5, Yulia Lakhman3, Andreas A Meier3, Ramon Sosa3, Robert A Soslow6, Douglas A Levine7, Britta Weigelt6, Carol Aghajanian8, Hedvig Hricak3, Joseph Deasy2, Alexandra Snyder8, Evis Sala3. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. vargasah@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 4. Service de Radiologie, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France. 5. INSERM, U1194, Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), Montpellier, France. 6. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the associations between clinical outcomes and radiomics-derived inter-site spatial heterogeneity metrics across multiple metastatic lesions on CT in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective study of 38 HGSOC patients. All sites of suspected HGSOC involvement on preoperative CT were manually segmented. Gray-level correlation matrix-based textures were computed from each tumour site, and grouped into five clusters using a Gaussian Mixture Model. Pairwise inter-site similarities were computed, generating an inter-site similarity matrix (ISM). Inter-site texture heterogeneity metrics were computed from the ISM and compared to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 12 inter-site texture heterogeneity metrics evaluated, those capturing the differences in texture similarities across sites were associated with shorter overall survival (inter-site similarity entropy, similarity level cluster shade, and inter-site similarity level cluster prominence; p ≤ 0.05) and incomplete surgical resection (similarity level cluster shade, inter-site similarity level cluster prominence and inter-site cluster variance; p ≤ 0.05). Neither the total number of disease sites per patient nor the overall tumour volume per patient was associated with overall survival. Amplification of 19q12 involving cyclin E1 gene (CCNE1) predominantly occurred in patients with more heterogeneous inter-site textures. CONCLUSION: Quantitative metrics non-invasively capturing spatial inter-site heterogeneity may predict outcomes in patients with HGSOC. KEY POINTS: • Calculating inter-site texture-based heterogeneity metrics was feasible • Metrics capturing texture similarities across HGSOC sites were associated with overall survival • Heterogeneity metrics were also associated with incomplete surgical resection of HGSOC.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the associations between clinical outcomes and radiomics-derived inter-site spatial heterogeneity metrics across multiple metastatic lesions on CT in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: IRB-approved retrospective study of 38 HGSOC patients. All sites of suspected HGSOC involvement on preoperative CT were manually segmented. Gray-level correlation matrix-based textures were computed from each tumour site, and grouped into five clusters using a Gaussian Mixture Model. Pairwise inter-site similarities were computed, generating an inter-site similarity matrix (ISM). Inter-site texture heterogeneity metrics were computed from the ISM and compared to clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 12 inter-site texture heterogeneity metrics evaluated, those capturing the differences in texture similarities across sites were associated with shorter overall survival (inter-site similarity entropy, similarity level cluster shade, and inter-site similarity level cluster prominence; p ≤ 0.05) and incomplete surgical resection (similarity level cluster shade, inter-site similarity level cluster prominence and inter-site cluster variance; p ≤ 0.05). Neither the total number of disease sites per patient nor the overall tumour volume per patient was associated with overall survival. Amplification of 19q12 involving cyclin E1 gene (CCNE1) predominantly occurred in patients with more heterogeneous inter-site textures. CONCLUSION: Quantitative metrics non-invasively capturing spatial inter-site heterogeneity may predict outcomes in patients with HGSOC. KEY POINTS: • Calculating inter-site texture-based heterogeneity metrics was feasible • Metrics capturing texture similarities across HGSOC sites were associated with overall survival • Heterogeneity metrics were also associated with incomplete surgical resection of HGSOC.
Authors: J Engel; R Eckel; G Schubert-Fritschle; J Kerr; W Kuhn; J Diebold; R Kimmig; J Rehbock; D Hölzel Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: David M Hyman; Qin Zhou; Alexia Iasonos; Rachel N Grisham; Angela G Arnold; Mary F Phillips; Jasmine Bhatia; Douglas A Levine; Carol Aghajanian; Kenneth Offit; Richard R Barakat; David R Spriggs; Noah D Kauff Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hebert Alberto Vargas; Maura Miccò; Seong Im Hong; Debra A Goldman; Fanny Dao; Britta Weigelt; Robert A Soslow; Hedvig Hricak; Douglas A Levine; Evis Sala Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Naiyer A Rizvi; Matthew D Hellmann; Alexandra Snyder; Pia Kvistborg; Vladimir Makarov; Jonathan J Havel; William Lee; Jianda Yuan; Phillip Wong; Teresa S Ho; Martin L Miller; Natasha Rekhtman; Andre L Moreira; Fawzia Ibrahim; Cameron Bruggeman; Billel Gasmi; Roberta Zappasodi; Yuka Maeda; Chris Sander; Edward B Garon; Taha Merghoub; Jedd D Wolchok; Ton N Schumacher; Timothy A Chan Journal: Science Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Willy Hugo; Jesse M Zaretsky; Lu Sun; Chunying Song; Blanca Homet Moreno; Siwen Hu-Lieskovan; Beata Berent-Maoz; Jia Pang; Bartosz Chmielowski; Grace Cherry; Elizabeth Seja; Shirley Lomeli; Xiangju Kong; Mark C Kelley; Jeffrey A Sosman; Douglas B Johnson; Antoni Ribas; Roger S Lo Journal: Cell Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Dariush Etemadmoghadam; Anna deFazio; Rameen Beroukhim; Craig Mermel; Joshy George; Gad Getz; Richard Tothill; Aikou Okamoto; Maria B Raeder; Paul Harnett; Stephen Lade; Lars A Akslen; Anna V Tinker; Bianca Locandro; Kathryn Alsop; Yoke-Eng Chiew; Nadia Traficante; Sian Fereday; Daryl Johnson; Stephen Fox; William Sellers; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Helga B Salvesen; Matthew Meyerson; David Bowtell Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dejan Juric; Pau Castel; Malachi Griffith; Obi L Griffith; Helen H Won; Haley Ellis; Saya H Ebbesen; Benjamin J Ainscough; Avinash Ramu; Gopa Iyer; Ronak H Shah; Tiffany Huynh; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Dennis Sgroi; Steven Isakoff; Ashraf Thabet; Leila Elamine; David B Solit; Scott W Lowe; Cornelia Quadt; Malte Peters; Adnan Derti; Robert Schegel; Alan Huang; Elaine R Mardis; Michael F Berger; José Baselga; Maurizio Scaltriti Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-17 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Hugo J W L Aerts; Emmanuel Rios Velazquez; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Chintan Parmar; Patrick Grossmann; Sara Carvalho; Sara Cavalho; Johan Bussink; René Monshouwer; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Derek Rietveld; Frank Hoebers; Michelle M Rietbergen; C René Leemans; Andre Dekker; John Quackenbush; Robert J Gillies; Philippe Lambin Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: He An; Yiang Wang; Esther M F Wong; Shanshan Lyu; Lujun Han; Jose A U Perucho; Peng Cao; Elaine Y P Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andreas Meier; Harini Veeraraghavan; Stephanie Nougaret; Yulia Lakhman; Ramon Sosa; Robert A Soslow; Elizabeth J Sutton; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala; Hebert A Vargas Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2019-06
Authors: Katja Pinker; Fuki Shitano; Evis Sala; Richard K Do; Robert J Young; Andreas G Wibmer; Hedvig Hricak; Elizabeth J Sutton; Elizabeth A Morris Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Minkook Seo; Moon Hyung Department Of Radiology Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital College Of Medicine The Catholic University Of Korea Seoul Republic Of Korea Catholic Smart Imaging Center Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital College Of Medicine The Catholic University Of Korea Seoul Republic Of Korea Choi; Young Joon Lee; Seung Eun Jung; Sung Eun Rha Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.630