Literature DB >> 322500

Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers.

B U Zachrisson.   

Abstract

The experience obtained in clinical evaluation of forty-three direct-bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers after a minimum observation period of 1 year (range, 1 to 2.5 years) is summarized. Results indicate that the bonded retainer has all the advantages of a fixed soldered retainer, in addition to being invisible. Patient acceptance was excellent, and the failure rate in terms of loose retainers was low. Also, for a number of other retention problems, direct bonding with different types of lingual wire seems to open up a range of promising new possibilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 322500     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90247-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  28 in total

1.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations.

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Terki K Al-Mutairi; Zaki W Hakami; Mohammad M Al-Malki
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite when used for lingual retainer bonding.

Authors:  I Veli; M Akin; E Kucukyilmaz; T Uysal
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.

Authors:  M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience.

Authors:  Katharina Scheibe; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

Authors:  Netrporn Chinvipas; Yuh Hasegawa; Kazuto Terada
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  [The mobility of the anterior teeth after the direct bonding of lingual retainers. A comparison of in-vitro and in-vivo measurements].

Authors:  J Schwarze; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-01

7.  Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; U Schulte; K Küpper; C Bourauel; L Keilig; S N Papageorgiou; C Dirk; C Kirschneck; N Daratsianos; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Fabian Jäger; Andreas Jäger; Pascal Schumacher; Michael Wolf; Ulrike Fritz; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Comparison of Two Retention Appliances with Respect to Clinical Effectiveness.

Authors:  Yeşim Kaya; Murat Tunca; Sıddık Keskin
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

10.  Pattern and amount of change after orthodontic correction of upper front teeth 7 years postretention.

Authors:  Anders Andrén; Sasan Naraghi; Bengt Olof Mohlin; Heidrun Kjellberg
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.