Literature DB >> 23239387

Repeated bonding of fixed retainer increases the risk of enamel fracture.

Netrporn Chinvipas1, Yuh Hasegawa, Kazuto Terada.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the influences of repeated bonding, using 2 different orthodontic adhesive systems, on the shear bond strength (SBS) and the enamel surface morphology. Sixty premolars were divided into 2 groups (n = 30), and either Transbond XT (T group) or Fuji Ortho LC (F group) adhesives were used. SBS was measured 24 h after bonding, using a universal testing machine. Then, the enamel surfaces were investigated and the mode of failure was described using adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores. After each debonding, 10 teeth from each group were examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the penetration of adhesives, the length of resin tags, and the state of the enamel surface. The other teeth were subjected to two more bonding/debonding procedures. In T group, the second debonding sequences had significantly higher bond strengths than the other sequences. The length of resin tags was greatest in the second debonding sequence, although there was no significant difference. In F group, the SBS increased with further rebonding and the failure mode tended towards cohesive failure. In both groups, the ARI scores increased with rebonding. Enamel loss could have occurred with both adhesives, although the surfaces appeared unchanged to the naked eye. From this study, we suggest that enamel damage caused by repeated bonding is of concern. To prevent bond failure, we should pay attention to the adhesion method used for bondable retainers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23239387     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-012-0095-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.634


  30 in total

1.  Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of enamel surfaces exposed to 3 orthodontic bonding systems.

Authors:  Morten Fjeld; Bjørn Øgaard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  A comprehensive survey of retention procedures in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Pamela M Wong; Terry J Freer
Journal:  Aust Orthod J       Date:  2004-11

3.  Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers.

Authors:  E H Dahl; B U Zachrisson
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1991-10

4.  Shear bond strength of a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study.

Authors:  C H Chung; P T Cuozzo; F K Mante
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface.

Authors:  D R Bearn; J F McCabe; P H Gordon; J C Aird
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Clinical comparison between a resin-reinforced self-cured glass ionomer cement and a composite resin for direct bonding of orthodontic brackets. Part 2: Bonding on dry enamel and on enamel soaked with saliva.

Authors:  V Cacciafesta; C Bosch; B Melsen
Journal:  Clin Orthod Res       Date:  1999-11

7.  Bond strengths of two integral bracket-base combinations: an in vitro comparison with foil-mesh.

Authors:  D Regan; R van Noort
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  K Reitan
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1967-10

Review 9.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.

Authors:  D R Bearn
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  B P Suryakumari Nujella; Manisha T Choudary; Satyanarayana P Reddy; M Kiran Kumar; T Gopal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bruxism's Implications on Fixed Orthodontic Retainer Adhesion.

Authors:  Anca Labuneț; Adriana Objelean; Oana Almășan; Andreea Kui; Smaranda Buduru; Sorina Sava
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christoph Roser; Tim Hilgenfeld; Sinan Sen; Tobias Badrow; Sebastian Zingler; Sabine Heiland; Martin Bendszus; Christopher J Lux; Alexander Juerchott
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.573

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.