Literature DB >> 30014179

Biomechanical properties of CAD/CAM-individualized nickel-titanium lingual retainers: an in vitro study.

Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich1, Fabian Jäger2, Andreas Jäger3, Pascal Schumacher4, Michael Wolf2, Ulrike Fritz2, Christoph Bourauel5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine and compare the mechanical properties of novel CAD/CAM(computer-aided design/manufacturing)-individualized nickel-titanium (NiTi) and conventional twisted wires.
METHODS: Seven NiTi wires (angular, 0.20 × 0.20 mm up to 0.50 × 0.50 mm) and two twisted steel wires (round, 0.40 mm and 0.44 mm) were investigated in three-point (3PBT) and four-point bending tests (4PBT) using the Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System. All wires were loaded up to a distance of 3.3 mm, and resulting forces were measured. Additionally, in the biomechanical test (BMT), CAD/CAM-individualized NiTi retainers (0.35 × 0.35 mm) were subjected to intrusive and extrusive deformation of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mm.
RESULTS: For twisted wires, typical plastic deformations were found in 3PBT (0.40 mm: 0.3 mm; 0.44 mm: 0.4 mm), and maximum resulting forces for these reached 1.3 N and 3.2 N for the 0.40 mm and 0.44 mm wires, respectively. Corresponding values in the 4PBT totaled 0.8 N for the 0.40 mm and 1.9 N for the 0.44 mm twisted wire. The NiTi samples showed plastic deformations in the 3PBT for the 0.25 × 0.25 mm dimension and in 4PBT for the 0.35 mm × 0.35 mm version. At a deflection of 1.5 mm, both tests revealed significantly different forces for the NiTi wires of different dimensions (p ≤ 0.001). In the BMT, no remarkable loading plateau or plastic deformation was observed. The resulting forces were significantly higher for extrusive than for intrusive deformation (p ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Individualized NiTi retainers feature specific elasticity and dimensional stability, and more deflection is necessary to achieve permanent deformations. The CAD/CAM production process did not significantly influence the biomechanical properties of the NiTi wires.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; Fixed retainer; Nickel titanium; Orthodontic wires; Plastic deformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30014179     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-018-0144-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  39 in total

1.  Load-deflection characteristics of superelastic nickel-titanium orthodontic wires.

Authors:  Peter D Wilkinson; Peter S Dysart; James A A Hood; G Peter Herbison
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers.

Authors:  Iosif Sifakakis; Nikolaos Pandis; Theodore Eliades; Margarita Makou; Christos Katsaros; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Stiffness in bending of a superelastic Ni-Ti orthodontic wire as a function of cross-sectional dimension.

Authors:  Pascal Garrec; Laurence Jordan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers.

Authors:  E H Dahl; B U Zachrisson
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1991-10

5.  Twenty-year follow-up of patients with permanently bonded mandibular canine-to-canine retainers.

Authors:  Frederick A Booth; Justin M Edelman; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Memotain: A CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer.

Authors:  Neal D Kravitz; Dan Grauer; Pascal Schumacher; Yong-Min Jo
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 7.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.

Authors:  D R Bearn
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  The relationship between maximal bite force, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S Kiliaridis; H Kjellberg; B Wenneberg; C Engström
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers.

Authors:  J Artun; A T Spadafora; P A Shapiro
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Inadvertent tooth movement with fixed lingual retainers.

Authors:  Timothy G Shaughnessy; William R Proffit; Said A Samara
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  Innovative customized CAD/CAM nickel-titanium lingual retainer versus standard stainless-steel lingual retainer: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Emilie Gelin; Laurence Seidel; Annick Bruwier; Adelin Albert; Carole Charavet
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.