Literature DB >> 20676817

Lower bonded retainers: survival and failure rates particularly considering operator experience.

Katharina Scheibe1, Sabine Ruf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the frequency and type of lower bonded retainer failures and to analyze the possible influence of operator experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 1062 patients with lower bonded retainers were analyzed with respect to retainer type and failure, timing of failure and differences among operators.
RESULTS: 34.9% of all patients experienced retainer failure. Cuspid retainers with two bonding sites failed significantly less often than multiple teeth retainers with six bonding sites. One or more bonding sites became detached in 22.8% of the patients, 17.9% had at least one total retainer loss, while only 0.8% of the patients suffered from retainer fractures. Experienced orthodontists exhibited significantly fewer failures than postgraduate students.
CONCLUSIONS: The present cohort presented a relatively high failure rate of 34.9%. Lower bonded cuspid retainers failed somewhat less often than 3-3 retainers. In addition less operator experience was likely to correlate with a higher failure rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20676817     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-010-1015-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  17 in total

1.  Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers.

Authors:  E H Dahl; B U Zachrisson
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1991-10

2.  Development of occlusal traits and dental arch space from adolescence to adulthood: a 25-year follow-up study of 245 untreated subjects.

Authors:  Teitur Jonsson; Sigurjon Arnlaugsson; Sigurdur Runar Saemundsson; Thordur Eydal Magnusson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 3.  Tooth stabilization for orthodontic retention.

Authors:  S D Josell
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1999-01

4.  An evaluation of changes in mandibular anterior alignment from 10 to 20 years postretention.

Authors:  R M Little; R A Riedel; J Artun
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers.

Authors:  B U Zachrisson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1977-04

6.  Breakage incidence with direct-bonded lingual retainers.

Authors:  K W Lumsden; G Saidler; J H McColl
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1999-09

Review 7.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.

Authors:  D R Bearn
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers.

Authors:  J Artun; A T Spadafora; P A Shapiro
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Retention and stability--taking various treatment parameters into account.

Authors:  Günter Lang; Günter Alfter; Gernot Göz; Günter H Lang
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Caries and periodontal reactions associated with long-term use of different types of bonded lingual retainers.

Authors:  J Artun
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-08
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Retention in orthodontics.

Authors:  C D Johnston; S J Littlewood
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Novel lingual retainer created using CAD/CAM technology: evaluation of its positioning accuracy.

Authors:  M Wolf; P Schumacher; F Jäger; J Wego; U Fritz; H Korbmacher-Steiner; A Jäger; M Schauseil
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Upper bonded retainers.

Authors:  Eva Schneider; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  3D-analysis of unwanted tooth movements despite bonded orthodontic retainers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Katharina Klaus; Faidra Xirouchaki; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.