Literature DB >> 25158950

Shear bond strength of a self-adhering flowable composite when used for lingual retainer bonding.

I Veli1, M Akin, E Kucukyilmaz, T Uysal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this work was to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) and fracture mode of a self-adhering flowable composite when used after thermocycling for lingual retainer bonding.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 human mandibular incisor teeth were categorized into four equal groups: group 1: Vertise™ Flow (VF) without acid etching; group 2: VF with acid etching; group 3: VF with a self-etching bonding agent accompanied by an additional acid etching; group 4: Transbond LR control. Either VF or Transbond LR was applied to the lingual surface of the teeth by packing the material into cylindrical plastic matrices to simulate the lingual retainer bonding area. After all teeth were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5 and 55 °C), fracture modes were examined under × 20 magnification. The SBS data were assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's tests. Fracture modes were analyzed by the χ(2) test at a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in SBS values between groups (p < 0.001) were observed. Group 4 exhibited the highest (14.63 ± 1.36 MPa) and group 1 the lowest SBS (2.67 ± 1.35 MPa) values. Statistically significant differences were noted in fracture modes between groups 1, 3, and 4 (p < 0.001). In all the self-adhering flowable composite groups, the adhesive type (tooth-composite interface) fracture occurred more frequently than cohesive and mixed-type fractures.
CONCLUSION: When applied to bond lingual retainers to unetched enamel or with self-etching bonding agent accompanied by an additional acid etching, Vertise™ Flow resulted in a significant decrease in bond strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25158950     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-014-0231-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  32 in total

1.  Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Zafer C Cehreli; Defne Kecik; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling.

Authors:  Jan De Munck; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Eduardo Coutinho; André Poitevin; Marleen Peumans; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Effect of aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Larry J Oesterle; W Craig Shellhart
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the shear bond test.

Authors:  P H DeHoff; K J Anusavice; Z Wang
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: the wire-composite interface.

Authors:  D R Bearn; J F McCabe; P H Gordon; J C Aird
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers.

Authors:  B U Zachrisson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1977-04

Review 7.  Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review.

Authors:  D R Bearn
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Bond strengths of an antibacterial monomer-containing adhesive system applied with and without acid etching for lingual retainer bonding.

Authors:  Mustafa Ulker; Tancan Uysal; Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu; Faruk Izzet Ucar
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 9.  Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations.

Authors:  M S Gale; B W Darvell
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives and their predecessors to ground versus unground enamel.

Authors:  A Ruya Yazici; Zeren Yildirim; Atila Ertan; Gül Ozgunaltay; Berrin Dayangac; Sibel A Antonson; Donald E Antonson
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bonding performance of self-adhesive flowable composites to enamel, dentin and a nano-hybrid composite.

Authors:  Jana Peterson; Marta Rizk; Monika Hoch; Annette Wiegand
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Lingual retainer materials: Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of flowable nanocomposites and universal composite: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohsen Nosouhian; Mohamad Monirifard; Fateme Gharibpour; Saeed Sadeghian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-08-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.