Christine A March1, Michelle Nanni2, Traci M Kazmerski3, Linda M Siminerio4, Elizabeth Miller3, Ingrid M Libman1. 1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, practices, and attitudes of school nurses related to modern diabetes devices (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and hybrid-closed loop systems). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 40 public school nurses caring for children in elementary and middle schools. Developed with stakeholder input, the interview questions explored experiences working with devices and communicating with the health care system. Deidentified transcripts were analyzed through an iterative process of coding to identify major themes. RESULTS: School nurses reported a range of educational backgrounds (58% undergraduate, 42% graduate), geographic settings (20% urban, 55% suburban, 25% rural), and years of experience (20% <5 years, 38%, 5-15 years, 42% >15 years). Four major themes emerged: (a) As devices become more common, school nurses must quickly develop new knowledge and skills yet have inconsistent training opportunities; (b) Enthusiasm for devices is tempered by concerns about implementation due to poor planning prior to the school year and potential disruptions by remote monitors; (c) Barriers exist to integrating devices into schools, including school/classroom policies, liability/privacy concerns, and variable staff engagement; and (d) Collaboration between school nurses and providers is limited; better communication may benefit children with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Devices are increasingly used by school-aged children. School nurses appreciate device potential but share structural and individual-level challenges. Guiding policy is needed as the technology progressively becomes standard of care. Enhanced training and collaboration with diabetes providers may help to optimize school-based management for children in the modern era.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the experiences, practices, and attitudes of school nurses related to modern diabetes devices (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors, and hybrid-closed loop systems). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 40 public school nurses caring for children in elementary and middle schools. Developed with stakeholder input, the interview questions explored experiences working with devices and communicating with the health care system. Deidentified transcripts were analyzed through an iterative process of coding to identify major themes. RESULTS: School nurses reported a range of educational backgrounds (58% undergraduate, 42% graduate), geographic settings (20% urban, 55% suburban, 25% rural), and years of experience (20% <5 years, 38%, 5-15 years, 42% >15 years). Four major themes emerged: (a) As devices become more common, school nurses must quickly develop new knowledge and skills yet have inconsistent training opportunities; (b) Enthusiasm for devices is tempered by concerns about implementation due to poor planning prior to the school year and potential disruptions by remote monitors; (c) Barriers exist to integrating devices into schools, including school/classroom policies, liability/privacy concerns, and variable staff engagement; and (d) Collaboration between school nurses and providers is limited; better communication may benefit children with diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Devices are increasingly used by school-aged children. School nurses appreciate device potential but share structural and individual-level challenges. Guiding policy is needed as the technology progressively becomes standard of care. Enhanced training and collaboration with diabetes providers may help to optimize school-based management for children in the modern era.
Authors: Crystal C Jackson; Anastasia Albanese-O'Neill; Katherine L Butler; Jane L Chiang; Larry C Deeb; Katie Hathaway; Ed Kraus; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Alan L Yatvin; Linda M Siminerio Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis; Jean M Lawrence; Dana Dabelea; Jasmin Divers; Scott Isom; Lawrence Dolan; Giuseppina Imperatore; Barbara Linder; Santica Marcovina; David J Pettitt; Catherine Pihoker; Sharon Saydah; Lynne Wagenknecht Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christine Erie; Michelle A Van Name; Kate Weyman; Stuart A Weinzimer; Jennifer Finnegan; Kristin Sikes; William V Tamborlane; Jennifer L Sherr Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Peter M Calhoun; Bruce A Buckingham; David M Maahs; Irene Hramiak; Darrell M Wilson; Tandy Aye; Paula Clinton; Peter Chase; Laurel Messer; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck; John Lum Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2016-11-01
Authors: Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Lia Bally; Janet M Allen; Sara Hartnell; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Yue Ruan; Judy Sibayan; Craig Kollman; Peiyao Cheng; Roy W Beck; Carlo L Acerini; Mark L Evans; David B Dunger; Daniela Elleri; Fiona Campbell; Richard M Bergenstal; Amy Criego; Viral N Shah; Lalantha Leelarathna; Roman Hovorka Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Ruth I Hart; Barbara Kimbell; David Rankin; Janet M Allen; Charlotte K Boughton; Fiona Campbell; Carine de Beaufort; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Julia Ware; Sabine E Hofer; Thomas M Kapellen; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Ajay Thankamony; Roman Hovorka; Julia Lawton Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 4.213