Literature DB >> 28303678

Schooling diabetes: Use of continuous glucose monitoring and remote monitors in the home and school settings.

Christine Erie1, Michelle A Van Name2, Kate Weyman2, Stuart A Weinzimer2, Jennifer Finnegan2, Kristin Sikes2, William V Tamborlane2, Jennifer L Sherr2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite significant advances in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management, achieving targeted glycemic control in pediatric patients remains a struggle. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) with remote access holds the promise to address this challenge by allowing caregivers to monitor glucose, even when the child is not directly under their supervision.
OBJECTIVE: To explore real-time and remote CGM practices in homes and schools, including caregiver expectations regarding this technology.
SUBJECTS: Parents and daytime caregivers.
METHODS: Respondents answered an anonymous survey assessing characteristics of CGM use. Cross-sectional data were collected and analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods.
RESULTS: Thirty-three parents and 17 daytime caregivers responded. Threshold alerts (alerts when patients reached certain pre-set high or low limits) were used most frequently, followed by rate of change alerts. Most parents and daytime caregivers responded to low- and high-threshold CGM alerts by confirming with a glucose meter prior to treatment; while about one-third endorsed treating lows without a confirmatory test. Most parents expected their child's daytime caregiver to respond to CGM alerts and daytime caregivers felt the parent's expectations of them were reasonable. All parents and most caregivers reported decreased overall worry/stress. Parents felt positive about CGM use and daytime caregivers felt comfortable with CGM.
CONCLUSION: The positive and collaborative management reported by parents and daytime caregivers sets the stage for CGM to play an important role in the management of children with T1D both in the home and in the school settings.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  continuous glucose monitor; school; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28303678      PMCID: PMC5601025          DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes        ISSN: 1399-543X            Impact factor:   4.866


  14 in total

Review 1.  Insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in preschool and school-age children: how schools can integrate technology.

Authors:  Natasa Bratina; Tadej Battelino
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Real-time continuous glucose monitoring systems in the classroom/school environment.

Authors:  Kari Benassi; Jessica Drobny; Tandy Aye
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  The T1D Exchange clinic registry.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; William V Tamborlane; Richard M Bergenstal; Kellee M Miller; Stephanie N DuBose; Callyn A Hall
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  The rise of technology in diabetes care. Not all that is new is necessarily better.

Authors:  Carlo Acerini
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.866

6.  Constant vigilance: mothers' work parenting young children with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S Sullivan-Bolyai; J Deatrick; P Gruppuso; W Tamborlane; M Grey
Journal:  J Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.145

7.  The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Michael O'Grady; Anirban Basu; Aaron Winn; Priya John; Joyce Lee; David Meltzer; Craig Kollman; Lori Laffel; William Tamborlane; Stuart Weinzimer; Tim Wysocki
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 17.152

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Psychological experience of parents of children with type 1 diabetes: a systematic mixed-studies review.

Authors:  Robin Whittemore; Sarah Jaser; Ariana Chao; Myoungock Jang; Margaret Grey
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Irl B Hirsch; Lori Laffel; William V Tamborlane; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart A Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  8 in total

1.  Modern diabetes devices in the school setting: Perspectives from school nurses.

Authors:  Christine A March; Michelle Nanni; Traci M Kazmerski; Linda M Siminerio; Elizabeth Miller; Ingrid M Libman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Advances in Glucose Monitoring and Automated Insulin Delivery: Supplement to Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne L Peters; Andrew J Ahmann; Irl B Hirsch; Jennifer K Raymond
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2018-10-05

3.  Safety Evaluation of the MiniMed 670G System in Children 7-13 Years of Age with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Orit Pinhas-Hamiel; David R Liljenquist; Dorothy I Shulman; Timothy S Bailey; Bruce W Bode; Michael A Wood; Bruce A Buckingham; Kevin B Kaiserman; John Shin; Suiying Huang; Scott W Lee; Francine R Kaufman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Glucose management for exercise using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) systems in type 1 diabetes: position statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) endorsed by JDRF and supported by the American Diabetes Association (ADA).

Authors:  Othmar Moser; Michael C Riddell; Max L Eckstein; Peter Adolfsson; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Louisa van den Boom; Pieter Gillard; Kirsten Nørgaard; Nick S Oliver; Dessi P Zaharieva; Tadej Battelino; Carine de Beaufort; Richard M Bergenstal; Bruce Buckingham; Eda Cengiz; Asma Deeb; Tim Heise; Simon Heller; Aaron J Kowalski; Lalantha Leelarathna; Chantal Mathieu; Christoph Stettler; Martin Tauschmann; Hood Thabit; Emma G Wilmot; Harald Sourij; Carmel E Smart; Peter G Jacobs; Richard M Bracken; Julia K Mader
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 5.  Hypoglycaemia Remains the Key Obstacle to Optimal Glycaemic Control - Continuous Glucose Monitoring is the Solution.

Authors:  Peter Adolfsson; Donald Rentoul; Brigitte Klinkenbijl; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2018-09-10

6.  Prospective surveillance model in the home for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Louise A Koelmeyer; Emma Moloney; John Boyages; Kerry A Sherman; Catherine M Dean
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Data Sharing While Using a Closed-Loop System: Qualitative Study of Adolescents' and Parents' Experiences and Views.

Authors:  Julia Lawton; Ruth I Hart; Barbara Kimbell; Janet M Allen; Rachel Elizabeth Jane Besser; Charlotte Boughton; Daniela Elleri; Julia Fuchs; Atrayee Ghatak; Tabitha Randell; Ajay Thankamony; Nicola Trevelyan; Roman Hovorka; David Rankin
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Parents' experiences of using remote monitoring technology to manage type 1 diabetes in very young children during a clinical trial: Qualitative study.

Authors:  Ruth I Hart; Barbara Kimbell; David Rankin; Janet M Allen; Charlotte K Boughton; Fiona Campbell; Carine de Beaufort; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Julia Ware; Sabine E Hofer; Thomas M Kapellen; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Ajay Thankamony; Roman Hovorka; Julia Lawton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 4.213

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.