Literature DB >> 10591275

Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them?

S Sofaer1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of reasons why qualitative methods have been used and can be used in health services and health policy research, to describe a range of specific methods, and to give examples of their application. DATA SOURCES: Classic and contemporary descriptions of the underpinnings and applications of qualitative research methods and studies that have used such methods to examine important health services and health policy issues. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Qualitative research methods are valuable in providing rich descriptions of complex phenomena; tracking unique or unexpected events; illuminating the experience and interpretation of events by actors with widely differing stakes and roles; giving voice to those whose views are rarely heard; conducting initial explorations to develop theories and to generate and even test hypotheses; and moving toward explanations. Qualitative and quantitative methods can be complementary, used in sequence or in tandem. The best qualitative research is systematic and rigorous, and it seeks to reduce bias and error and to identify evidence that disconfirms initial or emergent hypotheses.
CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative methods have much to contribute to health services and health policy research, especially as such research deals with rapid change and develops a more fully integrated theory base and research agenda. However, the field must build on the best traditions and techniques of qualitative methods and must recognize that special training and experience are essential to the application of these methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10591275      PMCID: PMC1089055     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  1 in total

1.  Health services research as a scientific process: the metamorphosis of an empirical research project from grant proposal to final report.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.402

  1 in total
  181 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research.

Authors:  R K Yin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Expanding the Andersen model: the role of psychosocial factors in long-term care use.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Sarah A McGraw; Leslie Curry; Alison Buckser; Kinda L King; Stanislav V Kasl; Ronald Andersen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The "Demon Plague" and access to care among Asian undocumented immigrants living with HIV disease in New York City.

Authors:  Ezer Kang; Bruce D Rapkin; Carolyn Springer; Jen Haejin Kim
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2003-04

4.  Models of genetic counseling and their effects on multicultural genetic counseling.

Authors:  Linwood J Lewis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The resilience of the health care safety net, 1996-2001.

Authors:  Laurie E Felland; Cara S Lesser; Andrea Benoit Staiti; Aaron Katz; Patricia Lichiello
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Changes in hospital competitive strategy: a new medical arms race?

Authors:  Kelly J Devers; Linda R Brewster; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  The effect of hospital ownership conversions on nonacute care providers.

Authors:  Deborah Gurewich; Jefferey Prottas; Walter Leutz
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Organizational characteristics of high- and low-performing anticoagulation clinics in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Adam J Rose; Beth Ann Petrakis; Patricia Callahan; Scott Mambourg; Dimple Patel; Elaine M Hylek; Barbara G Bokhour
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Perspectives on educating pharmacy students about the science of safety.

Authors:  Terri L Warholak; David A Holdford; Donna West; Danielle L DeBake; John P Bentley; Daniel C Malone; John E Murphy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: Protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial.

Authors:  Judith M Resick; Robert M Arnold; Rebecca L Sudore; David Farrell; Shane Belin; Andrew D Althouse; Betty Ferrell; Bernard J Hammes; Edward Chu; Douglas B White; Kimberly J Rak; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.