Literature DB >> 10904512

Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

M K Giacomini1, D J Cook.   

Abstract

The second part of this 2-part series on how to interpret qualitative research addresses, "what are the results," and, "how do they help me care for my patients?" Qualitative analysis is a process of summarizing and interpreting data to develop theoretical insights that describe and explain social phenomena such as interactions, experiences, roles, perspectives, symbols, and organizations. Key results are often illustrated with excerpts from interview transcripts, field notes, or documents. The results of a qualitative research report are best understood as an empirically based contribution to ongoing dialogue and exploration. Empirically based theory evolves from a process of exploration, discovery, analysis, and synthesis. Each concept should be defined carefully in a way that is meaningful to the reader. Concepts should be adequately developed and illustrated when theoretical conclusions are drawn. Arguments should be explained and justified. The qualitative research report ideally should address how the findings relate to other theories in the field. The qualitative study can provide a useful road map for understanding and navigating similar social settings interactions, or relationships. JAMA. 2000;284:478-482

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10904512     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.4.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  109 in total

Review 1.  Transferability of principles of evidence based medicine to improve educational quality: systematic review and case study of an online course in primary health care.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Peter Toon; Jill Russell; Geoff Wong; Liz Plumb; Fraser Macfarlane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-18

2.  Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).

Authors:  A Rhodes; R P Moreno; E Azoulay; M Capuzzo; J D Chiche; J Eddleston; R Endacott; P Ferdinande; H Flaatten; B Guidet; R Kuhlen; C León-Gil; M C Martin Delgado; P G Metnitz; M Soares; C L Sprung; J F Timsit; A Valentin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Searching for evidence-based medicine in the literature. Part 3: Assessment.

Authors:  Barbara A Bartkowiak
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-05

4.  A statewide public health approach to improving organ donation: the Massachusetts Organ Donation Initiative.

Authors:  Howard K Koh; Marsha D Jacobson; Anne Marie Lyddy; Kevin J O'Connor; Sean M Fitzpatrick; Milly Krakow; Christine M Judge; Hillel R Alpert; Richard S Luskin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Preferred Physical Characteristics of Vaginal Film Microbicides for HIV Prevention in Pittsburgh Women.

Authors:  Maria D Fan; Lindsay F Kramzer; Sharon L Hillier; Judy C Chang; Leslie A Meyn; Lisa C Rohan
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 6.  Lay understanding of familial risk of common chronic diseases: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Dejana Braithwaite; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Modern diabetes devices in the school setting: Perspectives from school nurses.

Authors:  Christine A March; Michelle Nanni; Traci M Kazmerski; Linda M Siminerio; Elizabeth Miller; Ingrid M Libman
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Batting 300 is good: perspectives of faculty researchers and their mentors on rejection, resilience, and persistence in academic medical careers.

Authors:  Rochelle DeCastro; Dana Sambuco; Peter A Ubel; Abigail Stewart; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers.

Authors:  Rochelle DeCastro; Dana Sambuco; Peter A Ubel; Abigail Stewart; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Negotiation in academic medicine: narratives of faculty researchers and their mentors.

Authors:  Dana Sambuco; Agata Dabrowska; Rochelle Decastro; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.