Dulce M Cruz-Oliver1, Angel Pacheco Rueda2, Liliana Viera-Ortiz3, Karla T Washington4, Debra Parker Oliver5. 1. Palliative Medicine Program, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Suite 342B, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. Electronic address: dcruzoli@jhmi.edu. 2. University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, School of Medicine, Box 365067, San Juan, 00936-5067, Puerto Rico. Electronic address: angel.pacheco8@upr.edu. 3. University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, Department of Surgery, Box 365067, San Juan, 00936-5067, Puerto Rico. Electronic address: liliana.viera@upr.edu. 4. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri Medical Sciences Building, DC032.00, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA. Electronic address: washingtonkar@health.missouri.edu. 5. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri Medical Sciences Building, DC032.00, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA. Electronic address: oliverdr@health.missouri.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to explore the evidence surrounding educational videos for patients and family caregivers in hospice and palliative care. We ask three research questions: 1. What is the evidence for video interventions? 2. What is the quality of the evidence behind video interventions? 3. What are the outcomes of video interventions? METHODS: The study is a systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Researchers systematically searched five databases for experimental and observational studies on the evidence supporting video education for hospice and palliative care patients and caregivers, published in 1969-2019. RESULTS: The review identified 31 relevant articles with moderate-high quality of evidence. Most studies were experimental (74 %), came from the United States (84 %) and had a mean sample size of 139 participants. Studies showed that video interventions positively affect preferences of care and advance care planning, provide emotional support, and serve as decision and information aids. CONCLUSION: A strong body of evidence has emerged for video education interventions in hospice and palliative care. Additional research assessing video interventions' impact on clinical outcomes is needed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Videos are a promising tool for patient and family education in hospice and palliative care.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to explore the evidence surrounding educational videos for patients and family caregivers in hospice and palliative care. We ask three research questions: 1. What is the evidence for video interventions? 2. What is the quality of the evidence behind video interventions? 3. What are the outcomes of video interventions? METHODS: The study is a systematic review, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Researchers systematically searched five databases for experimental and observational studies on the evidence supporting video education for hospice and palliative care patients and caregivers, published in 1969-2019. RESULTS: The review identified 31 relevant articles with moderate-high quality of evidence. Most studies were experimental (74 %), came from the United States (84 %) and had a mean sample size of 139 participants. Studies showed that video interventions positively affect preferences of care and advance care planning, provide emotional support, and serve as decision and information aids. CONCLUSION: A strong body of evidence has emerged for video education interventions in hospice and palliative care. Additional research assessing video interventions' impact on clinical outcomes is needed. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Videos are a promising tool for patient and family education in hospice and palliative care.
Authors: Colleen K McIlvennan; Daniel D Matlock; Jocelyn S Thompson; Shannon M Dunlay; Laura Blue; Shane J LaRue; Eldrin F Lewis; Chetan B Patel; Diane L Fairclough; Erin C Leister; Keith M Swetz; Vicie Baldridge; Mary Norine Walsh; Larry A Allen Journal: JACC Heart Fail Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 12.035
Authors: C Adrian Austin; Dinushika Mohottige; Rebecca L Sudore; Alexander K Smith; Laura C Hanson Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-07 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Andrew S Epstein; Angelo E Volandes; Ling Y Chen; Kristen A Gary; Yuelin Li; Patricia Agre; Tomer T Levin; Diane L Reidy; Raymond D Meng; Neil H Segal; Kenneth H Yu; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Yelena Y Janjigian; David P Kelsen; Eileen M O'Reilly Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-04-22 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Susan L Mitchell; Muriel R Gillick; Yuchiao Chang; Michael K Paasche-Orlow Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2009-09-03 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Dulce M Cruz-Oliver; Martha Abshire Saylor; Katie E Nelson; Gabrielle E Milner; Marcela D Blinka; Nowell Durkin; Chakra Budhathoki; Debra Parker-Oliver; Thomas J Smith Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-04-20 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Dulce M Cruz-Oliver; Martha Abshire; Chakra Budhathoki; Debra Parker Oliver; Angelo Volandes; Thomas J Smith Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Hanne C Lie; Lene K Juvet; Richard L Street; Pål Gulbrandsen; Anneli V Mellblom; Espen Andreas Brembo; Hilde Eide; Lena Heyn; Kristina H Saltveit; Hilde Strømme; Vibeke Sundling; Eva Turk; Julia Menichetti Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 5.128