Elissa Kozlov1, M Carrington Reid2, Brian D Carpenter3. 1. Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: elk2020@med.cornell.edu. 2. Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, United States. 3. Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine if laypersons' knowledge about palliative care can improve with a brief education intervention. METHODS:152 adults were recruited to participate in a web-based randomized intervention trial that followed a 2 (content)×2 (format) between-subjects design. Groups received either a video intervention, an information page intervention, a video control, or an information page control. An ANCOVA with contrast coding of two factors was utilized to assess if knowledge, as measured by the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS), increased post intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between intervention group means and control group means on PaCKS scores from T1 to T2 F(1, 139)=11.10, p=0.00, ηp2=0.074. There was no significant difference in PaCKS change scores between the video intervention and information page intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an information page and a brief video can improve knowledge of palliative care in laypersons. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Self-administered educational interventions could be made available in diverse settings in order to reach patients and their families who may benefit from but are unaware of palliative care. Interventions more intensive than the one tested in this study might result in even more significant improvements in knowledge.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To determine if laypersons' knowledge about palliative care can improve with a brief education intervention. METHODS: 152 adults were recruited to participate in a web-based randomized intervention trial that followed a 2 (content)×2 (format) between-subjects design. Groups received either a video intervention, an information page intervention, a video control, or an information page control. An ANCOVA with contrast coding of two factors was utilized to assess if knowledge, as measured by the Palliative Care Knowledge Scale (PaCKS), increased post intervention. RESULTS: There was a significant difference between intervention group means and control group means on PaCKS scores from T1 to T2 F(1, 139)=11.10, p=0.00, ηp2=0.074. There was no significant difference in PaCKS change scores between the video intervention and information page intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an information page and a brief video can improve knowledge of palliative care in laypersons. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Self-administered educational interventions could be made available in diverse settings in order to reach patients and their families who may benefit from but are unaware of palliative care. Interventions more intensive than the one tested in this study might result in even more significant improvements in knowledge.
Authors: Barbara Hanratty; Derek Hibbert; Frances Mair; Carl May; Chris Ward; Ged Corcoran; Simon Capewell; Andrea Litva Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Angelo E Volandes; Michael Paasche-Orlow; Muriel R Gillick; E F Cook; Shimon Shaykevich; Elmer D Abbo; Lisa Lehmann Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Elissa Kozlov; Anna Cai; Jo Anne Sirey; Angela Ghesquiere; M Carrington Reid Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2018-05-23 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Motolani E Ogunsanya; Elizabeth A Goetzinger; Oluwatomi F Owopetu; Paulette D Chandler; Lauren E O'Connor Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2021-06-04 Impact factor: 4.090
Authors: Maria Dos Anjos Dixe; Irene Dixe de Oliveira Santo; Saudade Lopes; Helena Catarino; Susana Duarte; Ana Querido; Carlos Laranjeira Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 3.390