Rachel B Issaka1,2,3, Carly Rachocki4, Michael P Huynh5, Ellen Chen6, Ma Somsouk4,7. 1. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., M/S: M3-B232, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. rissaka@fredhutch.org. 2. Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. rissaka@fredhutch.org. 3. Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA. rissaka@fredhutch.org. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. School of Public Health, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: How clinical teams function varies across sites and may affect follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. AIMS: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of clinical practices associated with higher diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result in a multi-site integrated safety-net system. METHODS: We distributed survey questionnaires about tracking and follow-up of abnormal FIT results to primary care team members across 11 safety-net clinics from January 2017 to April 2017. Surveys were distributed at all-staff clinic meetings and electronic surveys sent to those not in attendance. Participants received up to three reminders to complete the survey. RESULTS: Of the 501 primary care team members identified, 343 (68.5%) completed the survey. In the four highest-performing clinics, nurse managers identified at least two team members who were responsible for communicating abnormal FIT results to patients. Additionally, team members used a clinic-based registry to track patients with abnormal FIT results until colonoscopy completion. Compared to higher-performing clinics, lower-performing clinics more frequently cited competing health issues (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.03) and lack of patient priority (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) as barriers and were also more likely to discuss abnormal results at a clinic visit (83% vs. 61%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest organized and dedicated efforts to communicate abnormal FIT results and track patients until colonoscopy completion through registries is associated with improved follow-up. Increased utilization of electronic health record platforms to coordinate communication and navigation may improve diagnostic colonoscopy rates in patients with abnormal FIT results.
BACKGROUND: How clinical teams function varies across sites and may affect follow-up of abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. AIMS: This study aimed to identify the characteristics of clinical practices associated with higher diagnostic colonoscopy completion after an abnormal FIT result in a multi-site integrated safety-net system. METHODS: We distributed survey questionnaires about tracking and follow-up of abnormal FIT results to primary care team members across 11 safety-net clinics from January 2017 to April 2017. Surveys were distributed at all-staff clinic meetings and electronic surveys sent to those not in attendance. Participants received up to three reminders to complete the survey. RESULTS: Of the 501 primary care team members identified, 343 (68.5%) completed the survey. In the four highest-performing clinics, nurse managers identified at least two team members who were responsible for communicating abnormal FIT results to patients. Additionally, team members used a clinic-based registry to track patients with abnormal FIT results until colonoscopy completion. Compared to higher-performing clinics, lower-performing clinics more frequently cited competing health issues (56% vs. 40%, p = 0.03) and lack of patient priority (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.01) as barriers and were also more likely to discuss abnormal results at a clinic visit (83% vs. 61%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest organized and dedicated efforts to communicate abnormal FIT results and track patients until colonoscopy completion through registries is associated with improved follow-up. Increased utilization of electronic health record platforms to coordinate communication and navigation may improve diagnostic colonoscopy rates in patients with abnormal FIT results.
Authors: Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-04-09
Authors: Christopher D Jensen; Douglas A Corley; Virginia P Quinn; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Wei K Zhao; Amy R Marks; Joanne E Schottinger; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Richard Contreras; Carrie N Klabunde; Charles P Quesenberry; Theodore R Levin; Pauline A Mysliwiec Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-01-26 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Samir Gupta; Liyue Tong; James E Allison; Elizabeth Carter; Mark Koch; Don C Rockey; Paula Anderson; Chul Ahn; Keith Argenbright; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jessica Chubak; Michael P Garcia; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Yingye Zheng; Douglas A Corley; Ethan A Halm; Amit G Singal; Carrie N Klabunde; Chyke A Doubeni; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Joanne E Schottinger; Beverly B Green; Virginia P Quinn; Carolyn M Rutter Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Virginia P Quinn; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jeffrey K Lee; Joanne E Schottinger; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Nirupa R Ghai; Alexander T Lee; Richard Contreras; Charles P Quesenberry; Bruce H Fireman; Theodore R Levin Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Elaine C Khoong; Natalie A Rivadeneira; Lucia Pacca; Dean Schillinger; David Lown; Palav Babaria; Neha Gupta; Rajiv Pramanik; Helen Tran; Tyler Whitezell; Ma Somsouk; Urmimala Sarkar Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Siddhartha Roy; Sabrina Dickey; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Alexandria Washington; Randy Polo; Clement K Gwede; John S Luque Journal: J Community Health Date: 2021-02
Authors: Cynthia M Mojica; Rose Gunn; Robyn Pham; Edward J Miech; Ann Romer; Stephanie Renfro; Khaya D Clark; Melinda M Davis Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Rachel B Issaka; Ari Bell-Brown; Cyndy Snyder; Dana L Atkins; Lisa Chew; Bryan J Weiner; Lisa Strate; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-08-02