Literature DB >> 28444278

Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Douglas A Corley1, Christopher D Jensen1, Virginia P Quinn2, Chyke A Doubeni3, Ann G Zauber4, Jeffrey K Lee1, Joanne E Schottinger2, Amy R Marks1, Wei K Zhao1, Nirupa R Ghai2, Alexander T Lee2, Richard Contreras2, Charles P Quesenberry1, Bruce H Fireman1, Theodore R Levin1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is commonly used for colorectal cancer screening and positive test results require follow-up colonoscopy. However, follow-up intervals vary, which may result in neoplastic progression.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and its association with risk of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2014) within Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California. Participants were 70 124 patients aged 50 through 70 years eligible for colorectal cancer screening with a positive FIT result who had a follow-up colonoscopy. EXPOSURES: Time (days) to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk of any colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease (defined as stage III and IV cancer). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adjusted for patient demographics and baseline risk factors.
RESULTS: Of the 70 124 patients with positive FIT results (median age, 61 years [IQR, 55-67 years]; men, 52.7%), there were 2191 cases of any colorectal cancer and 601 cases of advanced-stage disease diagnosed. Compared with colonoscopy follow-up within 8 to 30 days (n = 27 176), there were no significant differences between follow-up at 2 months (n = 24 644), 3 months (n = 8666), 4 to 6 months (n = 5251), or 7 to 9 months (n = 1335) for risk of any colorectal cancer (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 30; 2 months, 28; 3 months, 31; 4-6 months, 31; and 7-9 months, 43) or advanced-stage disease (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 8; 2 months, 7; 3 months, 7; 4-6 months, 9; and 7-9 months, 13). Risks were significantly higher for examinations at 10 to 12 months (n = 748) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; 49 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.14-3.42]; 19 cases per 1000 patients) and more than 12 months (n = 747) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.89-2.68]; 76 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.44-4.25]; 31 cases per 1000 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test result, compared with follow-up colonoscopy at 8 to 30 days, follow-up after 10 months was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer and more advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Further research is needed to assess whether this relationship is causal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28444278      PMCID: PMC6343838          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.3634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  35 in total

1.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.

Authors:  William G Paterson; William T Depew; Pierre Paré; Denis Petrunia; Connie Switzer; Sander J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sandra Daniels
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Barriers to full colon evaluation for a positive fecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Deborah A Fisher; Amy Jeffreys; Cynthia J Coffman; Kenneth Fasanella
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Factors that influence the decision to do an adequate evaluation of a patient with a positive stool for occult blood.

Authors:  H M Shields; M S Weiner; D R Henry; J A Lloyd; B J Ransil; D A Lamphier; D W Gallagher; D A Antonioli; B A Rosner
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Colorectal cancer screening, comorbidity, and follow-up in elderly patients.

Authors:  Katherine S Garman; Amy Jeffreys; Cynthia Coffman; Deborah A Fisher
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.378

6.  Measuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-up.

Authors:  David A Etzioni; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein; Martin L Lee; Clifford Y Ko; Robert H Brook; Patricia H Parkerton; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Endoscopic follow-up of positive fecal occult blood testing in the Ontario FOBT Project.

Authors:  Lawrence Paszat; Linda Rabeneck; Lori Kiefer; Verna Mai; Paul Ritvo; Terry Sullivan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.522

8.  Lagtimes in diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer: determinants and association with cancer stage and survival.

Authors:  J Wattacheril; J R Kramer; P Richardson; B D Havemann; L K Green; A Le; H B El-Serag
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Impact of a physician-oriented intervention on follow-up in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Barbara Turner; David Weinberg; Terry Hyslop; Walter W Hauck; Timothy Brigham; Todd Rothermel; James Grana; Neil Schlackman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Implementing colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: addressing cancer health disparities through a regional cancer collaborative.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; David Haggstrom; Tracy Jacobs; Ada Determan; Jennifer Granger; Wanda Montalvo; William M Snyder; Susan Lockhart; Ahmed Calvo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  87 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Barriers to Completing a Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Uninsured Patients.

Authors:  Katelyn K Jetelina; Joshua S Yudkin; Stacie Miller; Emily Berry; Alicea Lieberman; Samir Gupta; Bijal A Balasubramanian
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Importance of Age-Specific Insurer Perspective on Lifetime Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Multilevel Approaches to Reducing Diagnostic and Treatment Delay in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Mortality: the Role of Endoscopy Wait-Time and Stage at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Li Li; Catherine Fedorenko; Cynthia W Ko; John M Inadomi; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2020-02-12

5.  Making FIT Count: Maximizing Appropriate Use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.

Authors:  Vivy T Cusumano; Folasade P May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient Navigation After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Results Increases Diagnostic Colonoscopy and Highlights Multilevel Barriers to Follow-Up.

Authors:  Vivy T Cusumano; Anthony Myint; Edgar Corona; Liu Yang; Jennifer Bocek; Antonio G Lopez; Marcela Zhou Huang; Naveen Raja; Anna Dermenchyan; Lily Roh; Maria Han; Daniel Croymans; Folasade P May
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Missed Opportunities in Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Patients With Inadequate Bowel Preparations.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Carly Rachocki; Lukejohn W Day; Claire Horton; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers.

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Eric S Johnson; Michael C Leo; Jennifer L Schneider; David Smith; Raj Mummadi; Amanda F Petrik; Jamie H Thompson; Ricardo Jimenez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Time to Diagnostic Testing After a Positive Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.

Authors:  Chyke A Doubeni; Douglas A Corley; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Trends in Wait Time for Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Megan A Adams; Joel H Rubenstein; Rachel Lipson; Robert G Holleman; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.