Literature DB >> 24512861

Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care.

David T Liss1, David W Baker2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have shown racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening but have not provided a full national picture of disparities across all major racial/ethnic groups.
PURPOSE: To provide a more complete, up-to-date picture of racial/ethnic disparities in CRC screening and contributing socioeconomic and access barriers.
METHODS: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2010 were analyzed in 2013. Hispanic/Latino participants were stratified by preferred language (Hispanic-English versus Hispanic-Spanish). Non-Hispanics were categorized as White, Black, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, or American Indian/Alaska Native. Sequential regression models estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) and the degree to which SES and access to care explained disparities.
RESULTS: Overall, 59.6% reported being up-to-date on CRC screening. Self-reported CRC screening was highest in the White (62.0%) racial/ethnic group; followed by Black (59.0%); Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (54.6%); Hispanic-English (52.5%); American Indian/Alaska Native (49.5%); Asian (47.2%); and Hispanic-Spanish (30.6%) groups. Adjustment for SES and access partially explained disparities between Whites and Hispanic-Spanish (final relative risk [RR]=0.76, 95% CI=0.69, 0.83); Hispanic-English (RR=0.94, 95% CI=0.91, 0.98); and American Indian/Alaska Native (RR=0.91, 95% CI=0.85, 0.97) groups. The RR of screening among Asians was unchanged after adjustment for SES and access (0.78, p<0.001). After full adjustment, screening rates were not significantly different among Whites, Blacks, or Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders.
CONCLUSIONS: Large racial/ethnic disparities in CRC screening persist, including substantial differences between English-speaking versus Spanish-speaking Hispanics. Disparities are only partially explained by SES and access to care. Future studies should explore the low rate of screening among Asians and how it varies by racial/ethnic subgroup and language.
Copyright © 2014 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24512861     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  94 in total

1.  Unraveling the Determinants to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Asian Americans: a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Sophia B Kim
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-08-04

2.  Decisional stage distribution for colorectal cancer screening among diverse, low-income study participants.

Authors:  C M Hester; W K Born; H W Yeh; K L Young; A S James; C M Daley; K A Greiner
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-02-25

3.  Mandated coverage of preventive care and reduction in disparities: evidence from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Mary K Hamman; Kandice A Kapinos
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Rachel B Issaka; Maneesh H Singh; Sachiko M Oshima; Victoria J Laleau; Carly D Rachocki; Ellen H Chen; Lukejohn W Day; Urmimala Sarkar; Ma Somsouk
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Data-Powered Participatory Decision Making: Leveraging Systems Thinking and Simulation to Guide Selection and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Jennifer Leeman; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Florence K L Tangka; Melinda M Davis; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Shivan J Mehta; Yingye Zheng; Nirupa R Ghai; Dale F McLerran; Jessica Chubak; Virginia P Quinn; Celette Sugg Skinner; Douglas A Corley; John M Inadomi; Chyke A Doubeni
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Capsule Commentary on Berkowitz et al., Building Equity Improvement into Quality Improvement: Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening as Part of Population Health Management.

Authors:  Ravikumar Paluri
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Comparative Effectiveness of Multifaceted Outreach to Initiate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shira N Goldman; David T Liss; Tiffany Brown; Ji Young Lee; David R Buchanan; Kate Balsley; Ana Cesan; Jordan Weil; Bridget H Garrity; David W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.

Authors:  Karen E Kim; Fornessa Randal; Matt Johnson; Michael Quinn; Chieko Maene; Sonja Hoover; Valerie Richmond-Reese; Florence K L Tangka; Djenaba A Joseph; Sujha Subramanian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Lay health educators increase colorectal cancer screening among Hmong Americans: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Elisa K Tong; Tung T Nguyen; Penny Lo; Susan L Stewart; Ginny L Gildengorin; Janice Y Tsoh; Angela M Jo; Marjorie L Kagawa-Singer; Angela U Sy; Charlene Cuaresma; Hy T Lam; Ching Wong; Mi T Tran; Moon S Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.