Literature DB >> 32213083

An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Jaclyn Aramoana1, Jonathan Koea1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This investigation was undertaken to define the barriers to Indigenous peoples participating in biobanking and genomic research.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting on the experience of Indigenous peoples with biobanking, tissue banking, and genomic research. Studies pertaining to organ transplantation or blood donation for transfusion were excluded. The databases searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, with all literature available until the search date of June 1, 2018, included. The reference lists of all included papers, as well as related review articles, were manually searched to identify additional relevant studies. An inductive approach was used to identify common themes.
RESULTS: Seventeen publications discussed the experiences of New Zealand Māori (n = 2), Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (n = 3), Native Hawaiian (n = 4), Native Alaskan (n = 2), American First Nation (n = 2), or multiple ethnicities (n = 4). Across all Indigenous peoples, four themes emerged: land, ancestors, culture, and bodily substances are powerfully interconnected and can act on each other; tissue and blood can provide important information (both Western and traditional) about a person; the ownership of specimens-custodians, trustees, or guardians; and the beneficence of the researchers and research team.
CONCLUSION: Indigenous communities, like Western populations, are concerned with issues pertaining to handling, treatment, and ownership of tissue as well as knowledge gained from specimen analysis. Unlike many Western populations, Indigenous communities have retained a strong sense of cultural connection to ancestors and traditional lands and view biologic specimens as inseparable from these things.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32213083      PMCID: PMC7853871          DOI: 10.1200/JGO.18.00156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol        ISSN: 2687-8941


  29 in total

Review 1.  Patients' experiences on donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for the future research use of the tissue: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tuck Wai Chan; Sandra Mackey; Desley Gail Hegney
Journal:  Int J Evid Based Healthc       Date:  2012-03

2.  Ethnocultural community leaders' views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study.

Authors:  Béatrice Godard; Vural Ozdemir; Marilyn Fortin; Nathalie Egalité
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2010-07

3.  Human genome diversity--a project?

Authors:  R M Harding; A Sajantila
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Ethical genetic research in Indigenous communities: challenges and successful approaches.

Authors:  Rebekah E McWhirter; Djapirri Mununggirritj; Dipililnga Marika; Joanne L Dickinson; John R Condon
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 11.951

5.  Factors that affect willingness to donate blood for the purpose of biospecimen research in the Korean American community.

Authors:  Glorian P Yen; Adam Davey; Grace X Ma
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Genetic research in native communities.

Authors:  Lorrieann Santos
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2008

7.  Cancer patient perceptions about biobanking and preferred timing of consent.

Authors:  Kathryn L Braun; Joann U Tsark; Amy Powers; Kristen Croom; Robert Kim; Francine C Gachupin; Paul Morris
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 8.  Religious Values and Biobanking Decisions: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Eisenhauer; Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Qualitative study of knowledge and attitudes to biobanking among lay persons in Nigeria.

Authors:  Michael A Igbe; Clement A Adebamowo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  8 in total

1.  Citizen Science Models in Health Research: an Australian Commentary.

Authors:  Ann Borda; Kathleen Gray; Laura Downie
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2019-12-31

2.  Who's included? The role of the Clinical Research Nurse in enabling research participation for under-represented and under-served groups.

Authors:  Kelly Beer; Melanie Gentgall; Nicola Templeton; Claire Whitehouse; Nicola Straiton
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Online Training as a Means to Improve the Understanding of Ethical, Legal, and Social Aspects of Biobanking Research: Stakeholder Perspectives from South Africa.

Authors:  Shenuka Singh; Keymanthri Moodley; Rosemary Jean Cadigan
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Cancer and Indigenous Populations: Time to End the Disparity.

Authors:  Eva Segelov; Gail Garvey
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-02

5.  Increasing health equity through biospecimen research: Identification of factors that influence willingness of Native Americans to donate biospecimens.

Authors:  Ka'imi A Sinclair; Clemma Muller; Carolyn Noonan; Cathryn Booth-LaForce; Dedra S Buchwald
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 6.  The commercialization of biospecimens from Indigenous Peoples: A scoping review of benefit-sharing.

Authors:  Tarlynn Tone-Pah-Hote; Nicole Redvers
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-04

7.  Social differentiation of the perception and human tissues donation for research purposes.

Authors:  Anita Majchrowska; Michał Wiechetek; Jan Domaradzki; Jakub Pawlikowski
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  «If you give them your little finger, they'll tear off your entire arm»: losing trust in biobank research.

Authors:  Lars Ursin; Borgunn Ytterhus; Erik Christensen; John-Arne Skolbekken
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-12
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.