Literature DB >> 20977184

Ethnocultural community leaders' views and perceptions on biobanks and population specific genomic research: a qualitative research study.

Béatrice Godard1, Vural Ozdemir, Marilyn Fortin, Nathalie Egalité.   

Abstract

Substantial investments were made in population based biobanks over the past decade. Ethnocultural community members are both sponsors and beneficiaries of biobanks. In addition, the success of biobank projects depends on community support and participation. Yet there are few empirical data on views, perceptions and interests of ethnocultural communities on biobanks. This silent gap in genomics, ethics and policy literatures has to be addressed. We conducted a qualitative research study with in-depth interviews of ethnocultural community leaders (e.g., members of the Canadian Parliament, school commissioners) on their perspectives concerning population specific genomics research and biobanks. An equal partnership model where public is not only informed, but also involved in decision-making processes was perceived as an essential democratic requisite. These empirical data on ethnocultural community leaders' views, interests and perceptions identify several key socio-cultural and ethical factors that can be decisive for effective and sustainable community involvement in biobanks.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20977184     DOI: 10.1177/0963662509104721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  16 in total

1.  Biobanks and the phantom public.

Authors:  Herbert Gottweis; Haidan Chen; Johannes Starkbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03

Review 3.  Importance of Genetic Studies of Cardiometabolic Disease in Diverse Populations.

Authors:  Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Kristin L Young; Adam G Lilly; Laura M Raffield; Heather M Highland; Genevieve L Wojcik; Cary Agler; Shelly-Ann M Love; Samson Okello; Lauren E Petty; Mariaelisa Graff; Jennifer E Below; Kimon Divaris; Kari E North
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Scientists' perspectives on consent in the context of biobanking research.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Lisa Campo-Engelstein; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 5.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 6.  An Integrative Review of the Barriers to Indigenous Peoples Participation in Biobanking and Genomic Research.

Authors:  Jaclyn Aramoana; Jonathan Koea
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07

Review 7.  Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alma Husedzinovic; Dominik Ose; Christoph Schickhardt; Stefan Fröhling; Eva C Winkler
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Incorporating exclusion clauses into informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  Ethical aspects of human biobanks: a systematic review.

Authors:  Danijela Budimir; Ozren Polasek; Ana Marusić; Ivana Kolcić; Tatijana Zemunik; Vesna Boraska; Ana Jeroncić; Mladen Boban; Harry Campbell; Igor Rudan
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.351

10.  Cancer patient perceptions on the ethical and legal issues related to biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; Jaime O Claudio; Christen Rachul; Jean C Y Wang; Mark D Minden; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.