Literature DB >> 3221171

Use of risk factors to allocate schedules for breast cancer screening.

F E Alexander1, M M Roberts, A Huggins, B B Muir.   

Abstract

In an effort to reduce the cost of breast cancer screening several studies have explored the possibility of using risk factors to select a high-risk group of women and then restrict screening to that group. The results of these studies have been almost entirely negative and so it is not possible at present to classify any woman as at such low risk that she need not be screened. Nevertheless it is well known that some groups of women can be identified as being at higher risk than the general population. In this study it is assumed that each woman will be offered one screen at which risk factor information will be collected. The usual screening policy is then one of uniform intervention in which the interval to the next screen is the same for all women: the interval that is currently recommended in the UK is three years. An alternative is a risk strategy in which the time to the next screen depends on the woman's risk status; thus the total number of screens available to the population are distributed according to risk status. Using data from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast cancer screening these policies have been compared. It is estimated that the proportion of cases detected by screening in the three years following the completion of the initial screening round could be raised from 60% to 67% by adopting a risk strategy. Lead time benefits are also quantified as are the comparisons for an established screening programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3221171      PMCID: PMC1052716          DOI: 10.1136/jech.42.2.193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  9 in total

1.  The "at risk" register: a statistical evaluation.

Authors:  E D Alberman; H Goldstein
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1970-08

2.  Risk factors for breast cancer with applications to selection for the prevalence screen.

Authors:  F E Alexander; M M Roberts; A Huggins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Selection of women at high risk of breast cancer for initial screening.

Authors:  M T Schechter; A B Miller; C J Baines; G R Howe
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

4.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes.

Authors:  N E Day; S D Walter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors for breast cancer: relevance to screening.

Authors:  S W Duffy; M M Roberts; R A Elton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  The DOM project for the early detection of breast cancer, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Authors:  F de Waard; H J Collette; J J Rombach; E A Baanders-van Halewijn; C Honing
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

8.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The Edinburgh randomised trial of screening for breast cancer: description of method.

Authors:  M M Roberts; F E Alexander; T J Anderson; A P Forrest; W Hepburn; A Huggins; A E Kirkpatrick; J Lamb; W Lutz; B B Muir
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Uses and abuses of multivariate methods in epidemiology.

Authors:  S J Evans
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Risk targeting in cervical screening: a new look at an old problem.

Authors:  C E Wilkinson; T J Peters; I M Harvey; N C Stott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

4.  A proposal for short-term quality control in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; M C Van den Ban; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.