Literature DB >> 6743506

The Edinburgh randomised trial of screening for breast cancer: description of method.

M M Roberts, F E Alexander, T J Anderson, A P Forrest, W Hepburn, A Huggins, A E Kirkpatrick, J Lamb, W Lutz, B B Muir.   

Abstract

Edinburgh was selected as one of the centres in the UK Seven-year Trial of Breast Screening of women aged 45-65 which began in 1979. Subsequently, our study was extended to a randomised trial with its own control population within the city. Half the practices were randomly allocated for screening, giving a cluster sampling of women. The total number in the trial is 65,000. Women with previously diagnosed breast cancer are excluded. Women allocated for screening are invited to the clinic and screened according to the procedures specified in the U.K. protocol, having clinical examination every year and mammography on alternate years. The two modalities of screening are assessed independently and the role of nurses is being evaluated. Breast cancer incidence is monitored by pathology register and the local cancer registry office and deaths from the General Register office. Long-term follow-up will be obtained through flagging at NHS Central Register. To determine the value of screening, standard statistical methods will be used to compare breast cancer mortality rates in the whole of the screening population with that of the controls. This trial has a power of 83% of detecting a reduction in mortality of 35% after 7 years of follow-up and a power of 95% of detecting a similar reduction at 10 years (alpha = 0.05, one-sided test).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6743506      PMCID: PMC1976924          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1984.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  9 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  W D George; E N Gleave; P C England; M C Wilson; R A Sellwood; D Asbury; G Hartley; P G Barker; P Hobbs; J Wakefield
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-10-09

2.  Error-rates in screening for breast cancer by clinical examination and mammography.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; R E Clifford; B E Nathan; J L Price; I Burn
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1979-06

3.  Some pitfalls in the evaluation of screening programs.

Authors:  M Feinleib; M Zelen
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1969-09

4.  Population screening for breast cancer by single-view mammography in a geographic region in Sweden.

Authors:  B Lundgren
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Screening for breast cancer. Statement by British Breast Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-07-15

7.  Concepts and problems in the evaluation of screening programs.

Authors:  P C Prorok; B F Hankey; B N Bundy
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1981

8.  Localization and excision of occult breast lesions.

Authors:  U Chetty; A E Kirkpatrick; T L Anderson; J Lamb; M M Roberts; V Humeniuk; A P Forrest
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Breast cancer screening with mammography: a population-based, randomized trial with mammography as the only screening mode.

Authors:  I Andersson; L Andrén; J Hildell; F Linell; U Ljungqvist; H Pettersson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A brief history of the cluster randomised trial design.

Authors:  Jenny Moberg; Michael Kramer
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Edinburgh breast education campaign on breast cancer and breast self-examination: was it worth while?

Authors:  M M Roberts; S E Robinson; K French; A Proudfoot; H Talbot; R A Elton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Psychiatric morbidity after screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Dean; M M Roberts; K French; S Robinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  The menopause and breast cancer.

Authors:  F E Alexander; M M Roberts
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Visibility of mammographically occult breast cancer on diffusion-weighted MRI versus ultrasound.

Authors:  Nita Amornsiripanitch; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Diana L Lam; Brett Weitzel; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 1.605

7.  Older women's attitudes towards breast disease, self examination, and screening facilities: implications for communication.

Authors:  D S Leathar; M M Roberts
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-03-02

8.  Mass screening for breast cancer: benefits, risks, costs.

Authors:  J Valentin; W Leitz
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1988

9.  Mammographic screening for breast cancer: background of a pilot program in the Canton of Vaud.

Authors:  F Paccaud
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1993

10.  Nonattendance in the Stockholm mammography screening trial: relative mortality and reasons for nonattendance.

Authors:  E Lidbrink; J Frisell; Y Brandberg; I Rosendahl; L E Rutqvist
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.