Literature DB >> 1997104

A proposal for short-term quality control in breast cancer screening.

A L Verbeek1, M C Van den Ban, J H Hendriks.   

Abstract

Current proposals for a monitoring and evaluation system in breast cancer screening programmes focus on mortality reduction. Here emphasis is laid on the prevention of too high a number of false-positive screening results, i.e. no subsequent demonstration of malignancy. By comparing the specificity of the screening test, the positive predictive value and the detection rate with reference values, the screening performance can be measured in a very early phase of the programme, even before the registration results on interval cancers become available. The proposed average reference values for the first screening round are 99.2%, 40% and 5.4/1000, respectively. Measures specifically for the age groups 45-49, 50-59 and 60-69 will be given, thus allowing improvements to be made if necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1997104      PMCID: PMC1971772          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1991.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  13 in total

1.  Screening for breast cancer in Nijmegen. Report of 6 screening rounds, 1975-1986.

Authors:  P H Peeters; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; M J van Bon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  P J van der Maas; H J de Koning; B M van Ineveld; G J van Oortmarssen; J D Habbema; K T Lubbe; A T Geerts; H J Collette; A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1989-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Evaluation of overdiagnosis of breast cancer in screening with mammography: results of the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  P H Peeters; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; R Holland; J H Hendriks; M Mravunac; C Rothengatter; A Van Dijk-Milatz; J M Werre
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  A graphic method of estimating the specificity of screening programmes from incomplete follow-up data.

Authors:  J G Brecht; B P Robra
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  A licence for breast cancer screening?

Authors:  J B Witcombe
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-26

6.  Pathological aspects of the UK Breast Screening Project with special reference to minimal and 'borderline' lesions.

Authors:  C W Elston
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1984-06

7.  The Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening for breast cancer: recent results and calculation of benefit.

Authors:  L Tabar; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Repeated screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  J Chamberlain; R E Clifford; B E Nathan; J L Price; I Burn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Diagnosis of minimal breast cancers in the BCDDP: the 66 questionable cases.

Authors:  O H Beahrs; C R Smart
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Use of risk factors to allocate schedules for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  F E Alexander; M M Roberts; A Huggins; B B Muir
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.710

View more
  2 in total

1.  Breast cancer early diagnosis experience in Florence: can a self referral policy achieve the results of service screening?

Authors:  D Giorgi; E Paci; M Zappa; M Rosselli del Turco
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Is there a role for cervicography in the detection of premalignant lesions of the cervix uteri?

Authors:  M Coibion; P Autier; P Vandam; A Delobelle; F Huet; D Hertens; M Vosse; M Andry; P De Sutter; R Heimann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.