Literature DB >> 32163009

First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants.

Rachel S Purvis1, Christopher R Long2, Leah R Eisenberg3, D Micah Hester3, Thomas V Cunningham4, Angel Holland5, Harish E Chatrathi6, Pearl A McElfish2.   

Abstract

Background: Health researchers and health research participants support the sharing of research results; however, results are typically only shared through peer-reviewed publications. Few studies have investigated researchers' ethical concerns related to sharing results with research participants.
Methods: An explanatory approach was used to explore the ethical concerns researchers may have with returning aggregate results to research participants. Researchers (N = 414) responded to an online survey of open-ended questions that allowed researchers to provide in-depth explanations regarding their responses to closed-ended questions.
Results: Across researchers, the mean percentage of studies for which ethical concerns were reported as a barrier to results sharing was 38.5% (SD= 30.7). Researchers' primary ethical concerns with returning results were articulated as an overarching desire to prevent harm to participants. Three broad ethical concerns emerged, each with underlying subthemes: 1) distress, 2) understanding, and 3) privacy. Conclusions: This is the first study to broadly explore researchers' ethical concerns with sharing aggregate research results with participants and reveals that researchers' ethical concerns are closely tied to the ethical obligation to do no harm. In order to increase results sharing, steps must be taken to help researchers understand how to minimize potential harm when sharing results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Research dissemination; health research dissemination; research ethics; results sharing; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32163009      PMCID: PMC7263438          DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth        ISSN: 2329-4515


  31 in total

1.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; Eric P Winer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Peggy G Chen; Nitza Diaz; Georgina Lucas; Marjorie S Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  The search for clarity in communicating research results to study participants.

Authors:  D I Shalowitz; F G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Does dissemination extend beyond publication: a survey of a cross section of public funded research in the UK.

Authors:  Paul M Wilson; Mark Petticrew; Michael W Calnan; Irwin Nazareth
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

Authors:  Heather Rigby; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Offering to return results to research participants: attitudes and needs of principal investigators in the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Eric Kodish; Susan Shurin; Charles Weijer
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.289

7.  Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  Conrad Vincent Fernandez; Jun Gao; Caron Strahlendorf; Albert Moghrabi; Rebecca Davis Pentz; Raymond Carlton Barfield; Justin Nathaniel Baker; Darcy Santor; Charles Weijer; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Why is therapeutic misconception so prevalent?

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Karen Albert; Paul Appelbaum; Laura B Dunn; Eve Overton; Ekaterina Pivovarova
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.566

9.  Feedback of trial results to participants: a survey of clinicians' and patients' attitudes and experiences.

Authors:  Karen Cox; Nima Moghaddam; Lydia Bird; Ruth Elkan
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.398

10.  Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.

Authors:  Anna Middleton; Katherine I Morley; Eugene Bragin; Helen V Firth; Matthew E Hurles; Caroline F Wright; Michael Parker
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  2 in total

1.  Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Michael J Young; Yelena G Bodien; Brian L Edlow
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 2.  Ethical, legal and social/societal implications (ELSI) of recall-by-genotype (RbG) and genotype-driven-research (GDR) approaches: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katharina Tschigg; Luca Consoli; Roberta Biasiotto; Deborah Mascalzoni
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 5.351

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.