Literature DB >> 15878983

Providing research results to study participants: support versus practice of researchers presenting at the American Society of Hematology annual meeting.

Heather Rigby1, Conrad V Fernandez.   

Abstract

Offering to provide research results to study participants is gaining increasing support based, in part, on the principle of respect for persons. The frequency and means of this practice is unknown in national and international research communities. All investigators who presented oral abstracts involving human research at the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting (December 2003) were surveyed. Responses were received from 197 (42%) of 472 eligible investigators. Nonrespondents did not differ in study type or country of origin. Only 30% (n = 48) of those who completed the survey had a formal plan for the return of research results; 40% of these would return both a summary plus individual level results. Of the respondents, 69% (n = 109) supported or strongly supported the practice; only 3% opposed the practice. The most commonly cited reasons for not returning results were: did not consider it (38%), anticipated contact difficulties (32%), and participant difficulty understanding results (26%). Only 11 (7%) indicated that their institutional review board (IRB) mandates the offer to provide results to all participants; this did not vary significantly by country. Given the high level of support in the international research community, evaluation of well-planned interventions for offering to provide research results to participants should be a priority.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15878983     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  29 in total

1.  Offering results to research participants.

Authors:  S Danielle MacNeil; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-01-28

2.  Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S Danielle MacNeil; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Researcher practices on returning genetic research results.

Authors:  Christopher Heaney; Genevieve Tindall; Joe Lucas; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-12

5.  Communicating the results of research: how do participants of a cardiac rehabilitation RCT prefer to be informed?

Authors:  Hasnain Dalal; Jennifer Wingham; Colin Pritchard; Sharon Northey; Philip Evans; Rod S Taylor; John Campbell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  Researcher and institutional review board perspectives on the benefits and challenges of reporting back biomonitoring and environmental exposure results.

Authors:  Jennifer Liss Ohayon; Elicia Cousins; Phil Brown; Rachel Morello-Frosch; Julia Green Brody
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.

Authors:  Christopher R Long; M Kathryn Stewart; Thomas V Cunningham; T Scott Warmack; Pearl A McElfish
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Recommendations for the return of research results to study participants and guardians: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Kathleen Ruccione; Robert J Wells; Jay B Long; Wendy Pelletier; Mary C Hooke; Rebecca D Pentz; Robert B Noll; Justin N Baker; Maura O'Leary; Gregory Reaman; Peter C Adamson; Steven Joffe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  Conrad Vincent Fernandez; Jun Gao; Caron Strahlendorf; Albert Moghrabi; Rebecca Davis Pentz; Raymond Carlton Barfield; Justin Nathaniel Baker; Darcy Santor; Charles Weijer; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.

Authors:  Karen L Edwards; Deborah Goodman; Catherine O Johnson; Lari Wenzel; Celeste Condit; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.