CONTEXT: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been promoted as an approach to understanding complex health problems not amenable to research conducted solely by outside investigators. Although broad dissemination of research results is a key element of the CBPR approach, existing dissemination efforts have not been assessed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In this systematic review, researchers evaluated studies utilizing the CBPR approach to characterize dissemination of research results beyond scientific publication. Specifically, the focus was on dissemination to community participants and the general public. The literature search encompassed articles published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Corresponding authors were also invited to complete a web-based survey. Data were collected and analyzed between July 1, 2008, and March 8, 2010. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In all, 101 articles met inclusion criteria. All articles were assessed for the quality of community involvement in research. Scores ranged from 1.4 to 3.0 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.3. The 21 articles in which an intervention was evaluated were scored for the rigor of research methods. Scores ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.4. Dissemination beyond scientific publication was reported in 48% of publications with varying levels of detail. However, among survey respondents, 98% reported dissemination of results to community participants and 84% reported dissemination to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: Among research meeting strict criteria for inclusion as CBPR, dissemination beyond scientific publication is largely occurring. However, myriad challenges to timely and widespread dissemination remain, and current dissemination to community participants and the general public is variable.
CONTEXT: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been promoted as an approach to understanding complex health problems not amenable to research conducted solely by outside investigators. Although broad dissemination of research results is a key element of the CBPR approach, existing dissemination efforts have not been assessed. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: In this systematic review, researchers evaluated studies utilizing the CBPR approach to characterize dissemination of research results beyond scientific publication. Specifically, the focus was on dissemination to community participants and the general public. The literature search encompassed articles published between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2009. Corresponding authors were also invited to complete a web-based survey. Data were collected and analyzed between July 1, 2008, and March 8, 2010. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In all, 101 articles met inclusion criteria. All articles were assessed for the quality of community involvement in research. Scores ranged from 1.4 to 3.0 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.3. The 21 articles in which an intervention was evaluated were scored for the rigor of research methods. Scores ranged from 2.0 to 2.9 (on a 3-point scale), with a mean of 2.4. Dissemination beyond scientific publication was reported in 48% of publications with varying levels of detail. However, among survey respondents, 98% reported dissemination of results to community participants and 84% reported dissemination to the general public. CONCLUSIONS: Among research meeting strict criteria for inclusion as CBPR, dissemination beyond scientific publication is largely occurring. However, myriad challenges to timely and widespread dissemination remain, and current dissemination to community participants and the general public is variable.
Authors: Jeannette O Andrews; Susan D Newman; Janie Heath; Lovoria B Williams; Martha S Tingen Journal: Nurs Clin North Am Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 1.208
Authors: Karen H Wang; Luis Marenco; Johanna Elumn Madera; Jenerius A Aminawung; Emily A Wang; Kei-Hoi Cheung Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-04-16
Authors: Susan Brown Trinidad; Evette J Ludman; Scarlett Hopkins; Rosalina D James; Theresa J Hoeft; Annie Kinegak; Henry Lupie; Ralph Kinegak; Bert B Boyer; Wylie Burke Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Melinda F Wiggins; Carol Brooke; Anna Jensen; Phillip Summers; Dana C Mora; Sara A Quandt Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2017
Authors: Barbara A Israel; Laurie Lachance; Chris M Coombe; Shoou-Yih D Lee; Megan Jensen; Eliza Wilson-Powers; Graciela Mentz; Michael Muhammad; Zachary Rowe; Angela G Reyes; Barbara L Brush Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2020
Authors: Rebecca Delafield; Andrea Nacapoy Hermosura; Claire Townsend Ing; Claire K Hughes; Donna-Marie Palakiko; Adrienne Dillard; B Puni Kekauoha; Sheryl R Yoshimura; Shari Gamiao; Joseph Keawe Kaholokula Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2016
Authors: Sarah Knerr; Sarah D Hohl; Yamile Molina; Marian L Neuhouser; Christopher I Li; Gloria D Coronado; Stephanie M Fullerton; Beti Thompson Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2016
Authors: Christopher R Long; M Kathryn Stewart; Thomas V Cunningham; T Scott Warmack; Pearl A McElfish Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 2.486