Literature DB >> 32162716

Multivariate use of MRI biomarkers to classify histologically confirmed necrosis in symptomatic total hip arthroplasty.

Mohammad Sherafati1, Thomas W Bauer2, Hollis G Potter3, Matthew F Koff3, Kevin M Koch1.   

Abstract

The failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly associated with the necrosis of the periprosthetic tissue. To date, there is no established method to noninvasively quantify the progression of such necrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of soft tissues near implants has undergone a recent renaissance due to the development of multispectral metal-artifact reduction techniques. Advanced analysis of multispectral MRI has been shown capable of detecting small magnetism effects of metallic debris in periprosthetic tissue. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the diagnostic utility of these MRI-based tissue-magnetism signatures. Together with morphological MRI metrics, such as synovial volume and thickness, these measurements are utilized as biomarkers to noninvasively detect soft-tissue necrosis in symptomatic THA patients ( N = 78 ). All subjects underwent an advanced MRI scan before revision surgery and tissue biopsies utilized for necrosis grading. Statistical analyses demonstrated a weak, but significant positive correlation (P = .04) between MRI magnetism signatures and necrosis scores, while indicating no meaningful association between the latter and serum cobalt and chromium ion levels. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were then performed based on uni- and multivariate logistic regression models utilizing the measured MRI biomarkers as predictors of severe necrosis. The area under the curve of the ROC plots for MRI biomarkers as combined predictors were found to be 0.70 and 0.84 for cross-validation and precision-recall tests, respectively.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD); magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers; metallosis; particle disease; total hip arthroplasty (THA)

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32162716      PMCID: PMC8100875          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  31 in total

1.  Imaging near metal with a MAVRIC-SEMAC hybrid.

Authors:  K M Koch; A C Brau; W Chen; G E Gold; B A Hargreaves; M Koff; G C McKinnon; H G Potter; K F King
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  Sonali Natu; Raghavendra Prasad Sidaginamale; Jamshid Gandhi; David J Langton; Antoni V F Nargol
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic versus asymptomatic subjects following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Catherine L Hayter; Edwin P Su; Matthew F Koff; Giorgio Perino; Stephanie L Gold; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Potential clinical impact of multiparametric quantitative MR spectroscopy in neurological disorders: A review and analysis.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn; Afshin Fayyazi; Renata Flury; Markus Windler; Georg Köster; Christoph H Lohmann
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF).

Authors:  Tian Liu; Ildar Khalidov; Ludovic de Rochefort; Pascal Spincemaille; Jing Liu; A John Tsiouris; Yi Wang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Comparative Epidemiology of Revision Arthroplasty: Failed THA Poses Greater Clinical and Economic Burdens Than Failed TKA.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Atul F Kamath; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Steve Kurtz; Vanessa Chan; Thomas P Vail; Harry Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  How long does a hip replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan T Evans; Jonathan P Evans; Robert W Walker; Ashley W Blom; Michael R Whitehouse; Adrian Sayers
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Madeleine A Gao; John P Neri; Yu-Fen Chiu; Bin Q Lin; Alissa J Burge; Edwin Su; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Decision Guidance Applications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Anastasia Gazgalis; Venkat Boddapati; Roshan P Shah; H John Cooper; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-09-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.