Literature DB >> 21387445

A novel background field removal method for MRI using projection onto dipole fields (PDF).

Tian Liu1, Ildar Khalidov, Ludovic de Rochefort, Pascal Spincemaille, Jing Liu, A John Tsiouris, Yi Wang.   

Abstract

For optimal image quality in susceptibility-weighted imaging and accurate quantification of susceptibility, it is necessary to isolate the local field generated by local magnetic sources (such as iron) from the background field that arises from imperfect shimming and variations in magnetic susceptibility of surrounding tissues (including air). Previous background removal techniques have limited effectiveness depending on the accuracy of model assumptions or information input. In this article, we report an observation that the magnetic field for a dipole outside a given region of interest (ROI) is approximately orthogonal to the magnetic field of a dipole inside the ROI. Accordingly, we propose a nonparametric background field removal technique based on projection onto dipole fields (PDF). In this PDF technique, the background field inside an ROI is decomposed into a field originating from dipoles outside the ROI using the projection theorem in Hilbert space. This novel PDF background removal technique was validated on a numerical simulation and a phantom experiment and was applied in human brain imaging, demonstrating substantial improvement in background field removal compared with the commonly used high-pass filtering method.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21387445      PMCID: PMC3628923          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  19 in total

1.  Artery and vein separation using susceptibility-dependent phase in contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  Y Wang; Y Yu; D Li; K T Bae; J J Brown; W Lin; E M Haacke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  New robust 3-D phase unwrapping algorithms: application to magnetic field mapping and undistorting echoplanar images.

Authors:  R Cusack; N Papadakis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Quantifying arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions with MR.

Authors:  Lin Li; John S Leigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI).

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Yingbiao Xu; Yu-Chung N Cheng; Jürgen R Reichenbach
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?

Authors:  Ferdinand Schweser; Andreas Deistung; Berengar Wendel Lehr; Jürgen Rainer Reichenbach
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  MR susceptometry for measuring global brain oxygen extraction.

Authors:  María A Fernández-Seara; Aranee Techawiboonwong; John A Detre; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Kevin M Koch; Xenophon Papademetris; Douglas L Rothman; Robin A de Graaf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Calculation of susceptibility through multiple orientation sampling (COSMOS): a method for conditioning the inverse problem from measured magnetic field map to susceptibility source image in MRI.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Ludovic de Rochefort; Bryan Kressler; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Ryan Brown; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  138 in total

1.  Cerebral microbleeds: burden assessment by using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Tian Liu; Krishna Surapaneni; Min Lou; Liuquan Cheng; Pascal Spincemaille; Yi Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Gradient echo plural contrast imaging--signal model and derived contrasts: T2*, T1, phase, SWI, T1f, FST2*and T2*-SWI.

Authors:  Jie Luo; Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Anne H Cross; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Quantification of Macrophages in High-Grade Gliomas by Using Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael Iv; Peyman Samghabadi; Samantha Holdsworth; Andrew Gentles; Paymon Rezaii; Griffith Harsh; Gordon Li; Reena Thomas; Michael Moseley; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hannes Vogel; Max Wintermark; Samuel Cheshier; Kristen W Yeom
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  QSMGAN: Improved Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping using 3D Generative Adversarial Networks with increased receptive field.

Authors:  Yicheng Chen; Angela Jakary; Sivakami Avadiappan; Christopher P Hess; Janine M Lupo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  In vivo normative atlas of the hippocampal subfields using multi-echo susceptibility imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Maged Goubran; David A Rudko; Brendan Santyr; Joe Gati; Trevor Szekeres; Terry M Peters; Ali R Khan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Quantitative oxygenation venography from MRI phase.

Authors:  Audrey P Fan; Berkin Bilgic; Louis Gagnon; Thomas Witzel; Himanshu Bhat; Bruce R Rosen; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Evaluation of oxygen extraction fraction in systemic lupus erythematosus patients using quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Mari Miyata; Shingo Kakeda; Kohsuke Kudo; Shigeru Iwata; Yoshiya Tanaka; Yi Wang; Yukunori Korogi
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Clinical Integration of Automated Processing for Brain Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: Multi-Site Reproducibility and Single-Site Robustness.

Authors:  Pascal Spincemaille; Zhe Liu; Shun Zhang; Ilhami Kovanlikaya; Matteo Ippoliti; Marcus Makowski; Richard Watts; Ludovic de Rochefort; Vijay Venkatraman; Patricia Desmond; Mathieu D Santin; Stéphane Lehéricy; Brian H Kopell; Patrice Péran; Yi Wang
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Integrated quantitative susceptibility and R2 * mapping for evaluation of liver fibrosis: An ex vivo feasibility study.

Authors:  Ramin Jafari; Stefanie J Hectors; Anne K Koehne de González; Pascal Spincemaille; Martin R Prince; Gary M Brittenham; Yi Wang
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 10.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Yongsheng Chen; Hyun-Seok Choi; Yongming Dai; Charbel Habib; Jiani Hu; Joon-Yong Jung; Yu Luo; David Utriainen; Meiyun Wang; Dongmei Wu; Shuang Xia; E Mark Haacke
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.