Literature DB >> 23677356

Magnetic resonance imaging findings in symptomatic versus asymptomatic subjects following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Danyal H Nawabi1, Catherine L Hayter, Edwin P Su, Matthew F Koff, Giorgio Perino, Stephanie L Gold, Kevin M Koch, Hollis G Potter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although pseudotumors have been reported at the sites of well-functioning and painful metal-on-metal hip prostheses, there are no objective data on the magnitude of the adverse reaction. This observational study was performed to investigate the ability of modified magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and quantify adverse synovial responses in symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. We hypothesized that the magnitude of the synovial reactions would be greater in symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (seventy-four hips) with hip resurfacing were divided into three groups: asymptomatic (twenty-two hips), symptomatic with a mechanical cause (twenty), and unexplained pain (thirty-two). The volume of synovitis was calculated on MRI for all patients.
RESULTS: Synovitis was detected in fifteen asymptomatic hips (68%), fifteen (75%) with symptoms with a mechanical causes, and twenty-five (78%) with unexplained pain. The mean volume (and standard deviation) of the synovitis in these groups was 5 ± 7 cm³, 10 ± 16 cm³, and 31 ± 47 cm³, respectively. The coefficient of repeatability between the examiners was 1.8 cm³ for measurement of synovitis. Of the thirteen subjects with revision arthroplasty, six had an adverse local tissue reaction. This subgroup had the highest volumes of synovitis on MRI.
CONCLUSIONS: An adverse synovial reaction was detected on MRI in both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects. We found a larger volume of synovitis in symptomatic patients; this increase reached significance only in the group with an adverse local tissue reaction. Synovial volume on MRI may be a valuable marker in the longitudinal assessment of asymptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal hip resurfacing and in identifying patients with adverse local tissue reaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23677356     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.01476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

1.  Multivariate use of MRI biomarkers to classify histologically confirmed necrosis in symptomatic total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mohammad Sherafati; Thomas W Bauer; Hollis G Potter; Matthew F Koff; Kevin M Koch
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Accelerating fully phase-encoded MRI near metal using multiband radiofrequency excitation.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Curtis N Wiens; Matthew R Smith; Diego Hernando; Alexey Samsonov; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  The surgical options and clinical evidence for treatment of wear or corrosion occurring with THA or TKA.

Authors:  Charles A Engh; Henry Ho; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Advanced metal artifact reduction MRI of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants: compressed sensing acceleration enables the time-neutral use of SEMAC.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Benjamin Fritz; Gaurav K Thawait; Esther Raithel; Wesley D Gilson; Mathias Nittka; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  What are the advantages and disadvantages of imaging modalities to diagnose wear-related corrosion problems?

Authors:  Denis Nam; Robert L Barrack; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  CORR Insights®: Periprosthetic UHMWPE Wear Debris Induces Inflammation, Vascularization, and Innervation After Total Disc Replacement in the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Timothy M Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of painful metal-on-metal total hip replacement.

Authors:  Vassilios S Nikolaou; Alain Petit; Viviane Khoury; Etienne Blain-Pare; David J Zukor; Olga L Huk; John Antoniou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-07

8.  Characterizing the limits of MRI near metallic prostheses.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith; Nathan S Artz; Curtis Wiens; Diego Hernando; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise?

Authors:  Reshid Berber; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-05-18

10.  High frequency of adverse local tissue reactions in asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal THA.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Susan Odum; Robert Sproul; Jessica Weathersbee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.