Literature DB >> 32155410

Stochastic Modeling of Autoregulatory Genetic Feedback Loops: A Review and Comparative Study.

James Holehouse1, Zhixing Cao2, Ramon Grima3.   

Abstract

Autoregulatory feedback loops are one of the most common network motifs. A wide variety of stochastic models have been constructed to understand how the fluctuations in protein numbers in these loops are influenced by the kinetic parameters of the main biochemical steps. These models differ according to 1) which subcellular processes are explicitly modeled, 2) the modeling methodology employed (discrete, continuous, or hybrid), and 3) whether they can be analytically solved for the steady-state distribution of protein numbers. We discuss the assumptions and properties of the main models in the literature, summarize our current understanding of the relationship between them, and highlight some of the insights gained through modeling.
Copyright © 2020 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32155410      PMCID: PMC7136347          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  56 in total

1.  How to make a biological switch.

Authors:  J L Cherry; F R Adler
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Noise-based switches and amplifiers for gene expression.

Authors:  J Hasty; J Pradines; M Dolnik; J J Collins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Stochastic gene expression in a single cell.

Authors:  Michael B Elowitz; Arnold J Levine; Eric D Siggia; Peter S Swain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Self-regulating gene: an exact solution.

Authors:  J E M Hornos; D Schultz; G C P Innocentini; J Wang; A M Walczak; J N Onuchic; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-11-04

5.  Determining the stability of genetic switches: explicitly accounting for mRNA noise.

Authors:  Michael Assaf; Elijah Roberts; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Transcriptional leakage versus noise: a simple mechanism of conversion between binary and graded response in autoregulated genes.

Authors:  Anna Ochab-Marcinek; Marcin Tabaka
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2015-01-16

7.  Steady-state fluctuations of a genetic feedback loop: an exact solution.

Authors:  R Grima; D R Schmidt; T J Newman
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Decomposition and tunability of expression noise in the presence of coupled feedbacks.

Authors:  Peijiang Liu; Zhanjiang Yuan; Haohua Wang; Tianshou Zhou
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.642

9.  Protein copy number distributions for a self-regulating gene in the presence of decoy binding sites.

Authors:  Pavol Bokes; Abhyudai Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Single-cell analysis of transcription kinetics across the cell cycle.

Authors:  Samuel O Skinner; Heng Xu; Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal; Pablo R Freire; Thomas P Zwaka; Ido Golding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Stochastic Model of Gene Expression with Polymerase Recruitment and Pause Release.

Authors:  Zhixing Cao; Tatiana Filatova; Diego A Oyarzún; Ramon Grima
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Learning of Iterative Learning Control for Flexible Manufacturing of Batch Processes.

Authors:  Libin Xu; Weimin Zhong; Jingyi Lu; Furong Gao; Feng Qian; Zhixing Cao
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-30

3.  Computation of Single-Cell Metabolite Distributions Using Mixture Models.

Authors:  Mona K Tonn; Philipp Thomas; Mauricio Barahona; Diego A Oyarzún
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-12-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.