Literature DB >> 3212575

The outcome of surgery for lumbar disc herniation. I. A 4-17 years' follow-up with emphasis on somatic aspects.

J Dvorak1, M H Gauchat, L Valach.   

Abstract

Records of 575 patients operated on for the first time for lumbar disc herniation have been reviewed. Four to 17 years after the operation 371 (65%) patients answered a questionnaire on number of reoperations, working capacity, lumbar or sciatic pain as well as necessity of treatment. Of these, 255 (70%) still complained of back pain, and 83 (23%) of this group complained of constant heavy pain; 172 patients (45%) have a residual sciatica; 131 (35%) are still under some kind of treatment; 47 (14%) patients are receiving a disability pension. Repeat operations were performed in 17%. Based on the criteria given by Spine Update 1984 as related to justified or unjustified indication there was no statistical difference in long-term results concerning the above-mentioned criteria of success. The so-called justified indication for disc herniation neurosurgery does not necessarily imply a good long-term result. In the preoperative investigation, not only symptoms and neurological signs, but also the socially and personally defined career of the illness are of importance. The patients with complaints, mainly those receiving a pension, are psychologically conspicuous and show more psychopathological features as monitored by MMPI than the patients without complaints after surgery. Psychological assessment should increasingly be used in the preoperative evaluation, especially in patients who do not present an absolute indication for neurosurgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3212575     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198812000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Jeffrey A Rihn; Alan S Hilibrand; Kristen Radcliff; Mark Kurd; Jon Lurie; Emily Blood; Todd J Albert; James N Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  [Two-years' follow-up after lumbar disc surgery.].

Authors:  A Junge; M Fröhlich; S Ahrens; M Hasenbring; D Grob; J Dvorak
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients.

Authors:  C Woertgen; M Holzschuh; R D Rothoerl; A Brawanski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Philosophy and efficacy of multidisciplinary approach to chronic pain management.

Authors:  Akiko Okifuji; Dennis C Turk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Comparison of postural control in unilateral stance between healthy controls and lumbar discectomy patients with and without pain.

Authors:  Katie Bouche; Veerle Stevens; Dirk Cambier; Jacques Caemaert; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lower limb pain caused by insufficient muscular microcirculation.

Authors:  Jung-Tung Liu; Wen-Jui Liao; Cheng-Siu Chang; Yung-Hsiang Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 7.  Is the term "pain disorder" a valid diagnosis?

Authors:  J Berger
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

8.  The risk of "getting worse" after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Kristin Sjaavik; Dag Hofoss; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Development of a screening questionnaire to predict good and poor outcome of lumbar disc surgery.].

Authors:  A Junge; S Ahrens; J Dvorak
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  Functional recovery in lumbar spine surgery: a controlled trial of health behavior change counseling to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Lee H Riley; Anica M Maggard; Saaniya Bedi; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.