Literature DB >> 16133081

Comparison of postural control in unilateral stance between healthy controls and lumbar discectomy patients with and without pain.

Katie Bouche1, Veerle Stevens, Dirk Cambier, Jacques Caemaert, Lieven Danneels.   

Abstract

MAIN PROBLEM: Previous studies have demonstrated that sciatica patients have poorer postural control than healthy controls and that postural control remains unchanged 3 months after lumbar discectomy in sciatica patients. The aims of the current study were to investigate whether static balance control recovers in pain-free discectomy patients long-term after lumbar discectomy. Next is to determine whether static balance responses of asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients differed from each other and from healthy controls. In addition, the influence of the extent of disc resection (unilateral/bilateral removal) and the side of operation on static balance control were investigated.
METHODS: Fifteen pain-free lumbar discectomy patients, 23 lumbar discectomy patients with residual pain and 72 controls performed unilateral stance tasks with eyes open and eyes closed on a force plate were taken up for the investigation. Three repetitions of a 10 s unilateral stance test were performed on each leg. Postural sway was determined. Patients were divided into three age groups.
RESULTS: In the eyes open condition, there was no significant difference between postural sway of pain-free lumbar discectomy patients and controls (P=0.68), whereas balance of patients with pain was significantly worse than in controls (P=0.003). In the eyes closed condition, the sway in both groups of lumbar discectomy patients was significantly worse than in controls (pain-free P=0.009/painful P<0.001). No significant differences were found in postural sway between patients with unilateral and bilateral disc resection. In unilateral stance on the leg of the operated side, centre of gravity sway was not significantly different in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition, whereas in stance on the leg of the non-operated side, postural sway was significantly lower in the eyes open condition compared to the eyes closed condition. In both conditions, postural sway in the age group of 50-65 years was significantly higher than in the age groups of 30-39 years (eyes open P=0.005; eyes closed P<0.001) and 40-49 years (eyes open P=0.002; eyes closed P=0.006). There was no significant difference between the age group of 30-39 years and the age group of 40-49 years (P=0.51).
CONCLUSION: As for long-term following lumbar discectomy, there is no complete recovery of postural control. Patients seem to develop visual compensation mechanisms for underlying sensory-motor deficits, which are, however, sufficient in case of pain relief only. Further study is needed to determine the cause of the balance disturbances in lumbar discectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133081      PMCID: PMC3489320          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1013-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects.

Authors:  L A Danneels; G G Vanderstraeten; D C Cambier; E E Witvrouw; H J De Cuyper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years.

Authors:  E Yorimitsu; K Chiba; Y Toyama; K Hirabayashi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Long-term disability and return to work among patients who have a herniated lumbar disc: the effect of disability compensation.

Authors:  S J Atlas; Y Chang; E Kammann; R B Keller; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: five-year outcomes from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R B Keller; Y Chang; R A Deyo; D E Singer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Balance in chronic low back pain patients compared to healthy people under various conditions in upright standing.

Authors:  M I Mientjes; J S Frank
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  G A Loupasis; K Stamos; P G Katonis; G Sapkas; D S Korres; G Hartofilakidis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Impaired postural control of the lumbar spine is associated with delayed muscle response times in patients with chronic idiopathic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; G K Polzhofer; H S Greene
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Disc herniation-related back pain impairs feed-forward control of paraspinal muscles.

Authors:  V Leinonen; M Kankaanpää; M Luukkonen; O Hänninen; O Airaksinen; S Taimela
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Pain catastrophizing and general health status in a large Dutch community sample.

Authors:  Rudy Severeijns; Marcel A van den Hout; Johan W S Vlaeyen; H Susan J Picavet
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  3 in total

1.  Postural control in patients with lumbar disc herniation in the early postoperative period.

Authors:  Tomasz Sipko; Marzena Chantsoulis; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients.

Authors:  Katie G W Bouche; Olivier Vanovermeire; Veerle K Stevens; Pascal L Coorevits; Jacques J Caemaert; Dirk C Cambier; Koenraad Verstraete; Guy G Vanderstraeten; Lieven A Danneels
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Effect of spinal manipulation on sensorimotor functions in back pain patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David G Wilder; Robert D Vining; Katherine A Pohlman; William C Meeker; Ting Xia; James W Devocht; R Maruti Gudavalli; Cynthia R Long; Edward F Owens; Christine M Goertz
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.