Literature DB >> 23816487

Functional recovery in lumbar spine surgery: a controlled trial of health behavior change counseling to improve outcomes.

Richard L Skolasky1, Lee H Riley, Anica M Maggard, Saaniya Bedi, Stephen T Wegener.   

Abstract

In 2001, the Institute of Medicine issued a challenge to the American health care system to improve the quality of care by focusing on six major areas: safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. The patient-centered model of care directly addresses important limits of surgical care of the lumbar spine, i.e., the lack of effective methods for increasing patient participation and engagement in post-operative follow-up. Recent evidence indicates that post-surgical outcomes are better among those with higher patient activation. We therefore developed an intervention based on the principles of motivational interviewing to increase patient activation: the Functional Recovery in Lumbar Spine Surgery Health Behavior Change Counseling (HBCC) intervention. The HBCC was designed to maximize post-operative engagement and participation in physical therapy and home exercise, to improve functional recovery, and to decrease pain in individuals undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. From December 2009 through October 2012, 120 participants were recruited and divided into two groups: those receiving (intervention group, 60) and not receiving (control group, 60) the HBCC intervention. The current manuscript provides a detailed description of the theoretical framework and study design of the HBCC and describes the implementation of this health behavior intervention in a university-based spine service. The HBCC provides a model for conducting health behavioral research in a real-world setting.
© 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FRiLSS; Functional Recovery in Lumbar Spine Surgery; HBCC; HEP; Health Behavior Change Counseling; Lumbar spine; MI; Motivational interviewing; ODI; Oswestry Disability Index; PAM; PT; Patient activation; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; SD; Spine surgery; home exercise programs; motivational interviewing; patient activation measures; physical therapy; standard deviation.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23816487      PMCID: PMC6153435          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  50 in total

1.  Patient activation and functional recovery in persons undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ellen J Mackenzie; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  A new technique for the treatment of lumbar far lateral disc herniation: technical note and preliminary results.

Authors:  R Greiner-Perth; H Böhm; Y Allam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  A randomized trial of methods to help clinicians learn motivational interviewing.

Authors:  William R Miller; Carolina E Yahne; Theresa B Moyers; James Martinez; Matthew Pirritano
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Ten things that motivational interviewing is not.

Authors:  William R Miller; Stephen Rollnick
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2009-03

5.  The role of self-efficacy and relationship quality in partner notification by adolescents with sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  J Dennis Fortenberry; Edward J Brizendine; Barry P Katz; Donald P Orr
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2002-11

6.  A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.

Authors:  E K Breivik; G A Björnsson; E Skovlund
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Motivational interviewing-based health coaching as a chronic care intervention.

Authors:  Ariel Linden; Susan W Butterworth; James O Prochaska
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Beyond CAGE. A brief clinical approach after detection of substance abuse.

Authors:  J H Samet; S Rollnick; H Barnes
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-11

Review 10.  Complications of revision spinal surgery.

Authors:  Kurt M Eichholz; Timothy C Ryken
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  6 in total

1.  Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part II: patient activation mediates the effects of health behavior change counseling on rehabilitation engagement.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Health behavior change counseling in surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Part I: improvement in rehabilitation engagement and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Telephone-Based Intervention to Improve Rehabilitation Engagement After Spinal Stenosis Surgery: A Prospective Lagged Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Whether Out-of-Bed Activity Restriction in the Early Postoperative Period of PELD Is Beneficial to Therapeutic Efficacy or Reduce Recurrence.

Authors:  Xiao Liang; Yexin Wang; Yaosheng Yue; Yanpeng Li; Chunyang Meng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  The role of Patient Health Engagement Model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: A structural equation model.

Authors:  Guendalina Graffigna; Serena Barello; Andrea Bonanomi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Worsening pain and quality of life for spine surgery patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Roles of psychological distress and patient activation.

Authors:  Rachel S Bronheim; Khaled M Kebaish; Amit Jain; Brian J Neuman; Richard L Skolasky
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-02-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.