Literature DB >> 7153426

The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

R D Patterson, I Nimmo-Smith, D L Weber, R Milroy.   

Abstract

The frequency selectivity of the auditory system was measured by masking a sinusoidal signal (0.5, 2.0, or 4.0 kHz) or a filtered-speech signal with a wideband noise having a notch, or stopband, centered on the signal. As the notch was widened performance improved for both types of signal but the rate of improvement decreased as the age of the 16 listeners increased from 23 to 75 years, indicating a loss in frequency selectivity with age. Auditory filter shapes derived from the tone-in-noise data show (a) that the passband of the filter broadens progressively with age, and (b) that the dynamic range of the filter ages like the audiogram. That is, the range changes little with age before 55, but beyond this point there is an accelerating rate of loss. The speech experiment shows comparable but smaller effects. The filter-width measurements show that the critical ratio is a poor estimator of frequency selectivity because it confounds the tuning of the system with the efficiency of the signal-detection and speech-processing mechanisms that follow the filter. An alternative, one-point measure of frequency selectivity, which is both sensitive and reliable, is developed via the filter-shape model of masking.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7153426     DOI: 10.1121/1.388652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  107 in total

1.  The effect of sound intensity on the frequency resolving power of hearing and the effect of interference.

Authors:  A Ya Supin; V V Popov; O N Milekhina; M B Tarakanov
Journal:  Dokl Biol Sci       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  Inharmonicity detection. Effects of age and contralateral distractor sounds.

Authors:  Manon Grube; D Yves von Cramon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Non-isomorphism in efficient coding of complex sound properties.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Excitation-based and informational masking of a tonal signal in a four-tone masker.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Jack J Hitchens; Emily Buss; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sex differences in auditory filters of brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Cochlea-scaled spectral entropy predicts rate-invariant intelligibility of temporally distorted sentences.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Michael Kiefte; Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.