Literature DB >> 3411045

Intensity discrimination, increment detection, and magnitude estimation for 1-kHz tones.

N F Viemeister1, S P Bacon.   

Abstract

Intensity difference limens (DLs) were measured over a wide intensity range for 200-ms, 1-kHz gated tones and for 200-ms increments in continuous 1-kHz tones. Magnitude estimates also were obtained for the gated tones over a comparable intensity range. The discrimination data are in general agreement with those from earlier studies but they extend them by showing: (1) good discrimination for gated tones over at least a 115-dB dynamic range; (2) a slight increase in the relative DL (delta I/I) as intensity increases above 95 dB SPL; (3) smaller DLs for increments than for gated tones, with the difference approximately independent of intensity; (4) negligible "negative masking" when thresholds are expressed as intensity differences (delta I). For two of the three subjects, magnitude estimates do not conform to a single-exponent power law for suprathreshold intensities. Over the middle range of intensities where a single exponent is appropriate, the value of the exponent is less than 0.1 for all subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3411045     DOI: 10.1121/1.396961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  The effect of narrow-band noise maskers on increment detection.

Authors:  Jessica J Messersmith; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of suprathreshold amplitude modulation and intensity increments: Weber's law revisited.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of external noise on detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Kim S Schairer; Lance Nizami; Samar Khaddam; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of perceptual weights to test a model of loudness summation.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Relative effects of increment and pedestal duration on the detection of intensity increments.

Authors:  Daniel L Valente; Harisadhan Patra; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Informational masking of negative masking.

Authors:  Christopher Conroy; Christine R Mason; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Deriving loudness growth functions from categorical loudness scaling data.

Authors:  Marcin Wróblewski; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Factors affecting the processing of intensity in school-aged children.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.