Literature DB >> 11768710

Stock optimizing in choice when a token deposit is the operant.

J J Widholm1, A Silberberg, S R Hursh, A A Imam, F R Warren-Boulton.   

Abstract

Each of 2 monkeys typically earned their daily food ration by depositing tokens in one of two slots. Tokens deposited in one slot dropped into a bin where they were kept (token kept). Deposits to a second slot dropped into a bin where they could be obtained again (token returned). In Experiment 1, a fixed-ratio (FR) 5 schedule that provided two food pellets was associated with each slot. Both monkeys preferred the token-returned slot. In Experiment 2, both subjects chose between unequal FR schedules with the token-returned slot always associated with the leaner schedule. When the FRs were 2 versus 3 and 2 versus 6, preferences were maintained for the token-returned slot; however, when the ratios were 2 versus 12, preference shifted to the token-kept slot. In Experiment 3, both monkeys chose between equal-valued concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules. Both monkeys preferred the slot that returned tokens. In Experiment 4, both monkeys chose between FRs that typically differed in size by a factor of 10. Both monkeys preferred the FR schedule that provided more food per trial. These data show that monkeys will choose so as to increase the number of reinforcers earned (stock optimizing) even when this preference reduces the rate of reinforcement (all reinforcers divided by session time).

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11768710      PMCID: PMC1284837          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  23 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Behavioral economics.

Authors:  S R Hursh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Is matching compatible with reinforcement maximization on concurrent variable interval variable ratio?

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; G M Heyman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Income maximizing on concurrent ratio-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  D Shurtleff; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus-food relations and free-operant postponement of timeout from response-independent food presentation.

Authors:  G Galbicka; M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Molar optimization versus delayed reinforcement as explanations of choice between fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  J E Mazur; W Vaughan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Ratio versus difference comparators in choice.

Authors:  J Gibbon; S Fairhurst
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Optimization versus response-strength accounts of behavior.

Authors:  W Vaughan; H L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Behavioral economic analysis of water intake in a laboratory rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Masumi Wakita
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 2.163

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.