| Literature DB >> 32098447 |
Paul T Reidy1, Ziad S Mahmassani2, Alec I McKenzie2, Jonathan J Petrocelli2, Scott A Summers3, Micah J Drummond2.
Abstract
: Intramuscular lipid accumulation has been associated with insulin resistance (IR), aging, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and obesity. A substantial body of evidence has implicated ceramides, a sphingolipid intermediate, as potent antagonists of insulin action that drive insulin resistance. Indeed, genetic mouse studies that lower ceramides are potently insulin sensitizing. Surprisingly less is known about how physical activity (skeletal muscle contraction) regulates ceramides, especially in light that muscle contraction regulates insulin sensitivity. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate studies (rodent and human) concerning the relationship between skeletal muscle ceramides and IR in response to increased physical activity. Our review of the literature indicates that chronic exercise reduces ceramide levels in individuals with obesity, diabetes, or hyperlipidemia. However, metabolically healthy individuals engaged in increased physical activity can improve insulin sensitivity independent of changes in skeletal muscle ceramide content. Herein we discuss these studies and provide context regarding the technical limitations (e.g., difficulty assessing the myriad ceramide species, the challenge of obtaining information on subcellular compartmentalization, and the paucity of flux measurements) and a lack of mechanistic studies that prevent a more sophisticated assessment of the ceramide pathway during increased contractile activity that lead to divergences in skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity.Entities:
Keywords: fitness; insulin sensitivity; obesity; physical activity; sphingolipids
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098447 PMCID: PMC7073171 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Cross-sectional studies in aging humans at baseline.
| Reference | Subjects | Age (y) | Aerobic Fitness | Health/BMI | Ceramide Method | Muscle Ceramide | Ceramide Species | IS Method | IS | Associations with IS | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivas et al. (2012) [ | Young | 22 ± 1 | - | Lean | HPLC-MS | - | - | - | - | None examined | C:16 - associated with leg lean mass and strength |
| Old (10 M) | 74 ± 2 | - | OW | = Young | > C:16, C:20 and Sat vs. Young | - | - | ||||
| Moro et al. (2009) [ | Lean | 24 ± 1 | - | Lean | LC/ESI/MS/MS | HE Clamp ^ | 8.3 ± 0.7 | Ceramides not associated with age | IMTG + correlated with ceramides | ||
| Obese | 41 ± 3 | - | Obese | > vs. Lean Young | > Sat vs. Lean Young | 6.1 ± 0.4 | |||||
| Søgaard et al. (2019) | Young | 23 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 46 ± 1 * | Lean | TLC-HPLC | 622 ± 74 | > C:16, C:18, C:22 vs. both OLD | Insulin 120-min OGTT (pmol·L−1) | 87.9 ± 14.8 | In young: No association in the old | - |
| Old (18 M) | 66 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 31 ± 1 * | Lean/OW | 410 ± 66 | - | 97.6 ± 55.3 | - | ||||
| Chee et al. 2016 [ | Young Lean ( | 21y ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 57 ± 2 ‡ | Lean | LC/ESI/MS/MS | - | - | HE Clamp, (mg·kg LBM−1·min−1) & skeletal muscle 2-DG accumulation | 65 ± 6.0 | Only with overweight | - |
| Old Lean | 70 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 45 ± 2 ‡ | Lean | - | - | 58 ± 6 | - | ||||
| Old Overweight ( | 69 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 40 ± 2 ‡ | OW | - | C:20: > Young Lean | 42 ± 5 | largely driven by differences in BW | ||||
| Søgaard et al. (2019) [ | Young | 32 ± 2 | VO2max-Rel: 28.3 ± 1.2 | Obese | LC/ESI/MS/MS | - | - | HOMA-IR | 2.14 ± 0.24 | Not reported | - |
| Old | 63 ± 1 | VO2max-Rel: 25.2 ± 1.0 | Obese | Sat, C:16, C:18, C:18:1: > Young Obese | Sat, C:16, C:18, C:18:1: > Young Obese | 1.88 0.23 |
>, greater than; BMI, Body Mass Index; BW, Body weight; Cer, Ceramides; F, female; HE, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic; HOMA-IR, Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance, IMTG, intramuscular trigycerides; IS, insulin sensitivity; M, male; min, minutes; n, number of subjects; OW, overweight; Sat, saturated; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; y, years; ^, μmol glucose infused·kg FFM−1·min; Rel, relative * (milliliters per kilogram per minute ); ‡, (milliliters per kilogram of fat free mass per minute ).
Exercise training studies in rodents.
| Reference | Subjects | Age | Aerobic Fitness | Health/BMI | PA Modification | Ceramide Method | Muscle Ceramide | Ceramide Species | IS Method | IS (PRE) | IS (Post) | Associations | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dobrzyń | Rat (Wistar) | 250–280 g | Sed | Lean | Control | TLC, GLC | ~135 nmol/g | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Rat (Wistar) | 250–280 g | Sed | Lean | 6 wk forced treadmill running | ~80 nmol/g ↓, sat in oxidative muscles | ↓ C14, C16, C16:1, C18, 20:4, 22, 24:1 | - | - | - | - | ↓ SM, | ||
| Tsalouhidou et al. (2009) [ | Rat (Wistar) | 7 wk | Sed | Lean | Control | one-dimensional TLC-GC | 0.33 ± 0.16 µmol/g | ↔ | - | - | - | None | PC, PE, PI, PS, CL, SM and LPC unchanged |
| Rat (Wistar) | 7 wk | Sed, Improved | Lean | 8 wk voluntary wheel running | BL=, | ↔ | - | - | - | 31% ↓ PI | |||
| Błachnio-Zabielska | Rat (Wistar) | 200–250 g | Sed | Lean | Control | HPLC | 24.57 ± 3.53 nmol/g wet wt | - | HOMA-IR | - | 1.13 ± 0.10 | Wrong direction | - |
| Rat (Wistar) | 24 h post | Sed | Lean | 5 wk forced treadmill running | 28.70 ± 3.59 nmol/g wet wt | - | HOMA-IR | - | 0.54 ± 0.04 ↓ | Wrong direction | Plasma FFA >100% lower, | ||
| Holloway et al. (2014) [ | Rat (Zucker) | ~255 g | Sed | Lean | 6 d e-stim | TLC, GLC | ↔ Red, ↓ White | ↔ Red, ↓ White | 3-OMG in perfused hindlimb | Lean > Obese | ↑, but Lean > Obese | + TAG, lipid droplet size | ↑ lipid droplets |
| Rat (Zucker) | ~350 g | Sed | Obese | 6 d e-stim | ↓↓ | ↓↓ C18 | - | ↑ | + TAG, lipid droplet size | ↑↑ lipid droplets |
↑, increase; ↑↑, large increase; ↓, decrease; ↓↓, large decrease; ↔, no change; 3-OMG, 3-O-methylglucose; AET, aerobic exercise training; alCDase, alkaline ceramidase; aSMase, acid sphingomyelinase; BMI, Body Mass Index; BL, baseline; CL, cardiolipin; d, days; e-stim, electrical stimulation; F, female; FFA, free fatty acids; g, grams; GC, gas chromatography; GLC, gas–liquid chromatography; h, hours; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; IS, insulin sensitivity; LPC, lysophosphatidyl choline; M, male; n, number of subjects; nCDase, neutral ceramidase; nmol/g, nanomole per gram; nSMase, neutral sphingomyelinase; PC, phosphatidyl choline; PE, phosphatidyl ethanolamine; PI, phosphatidyl inositol; PS, Phosphatidyl serine; Red, red portion of gastrocnemius; sat, saturated; Sed, sedentary; SM, sphingomyelin; SPA1P, sphinganine-1-phosphate; SPT2, serine palmitoyltransferase 2; TAG, triglycerides; TLC, thin-layer chromatography; White, white portion of gastrocnemius; wk, weeks; wt, weight.
Cross-sectional studies and muscle ceramides in humans.
| Reference | Subjects | Age (y) | Aerobic Fitness | Health/BMI | Muscle Ceramide | Ceramide Species | IMTG | Associations with IS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helge et al. (2004) [ | Untrained ( | 26 ± 1 | VO2peak-, Rel: 50.8 * | Lean | ~200 nmol/g | No difference between groups | - | - |
| Trained ( | 28 ± 2 | VO2peak-, Rel: 62.5 * | Lean | ~200 nmol/g | - | - | ||
| Skovbro | T2D ( | 54 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 31 ± 3 * | T2D/Obese | 108 ± 7 nmol/g | Trained > IGT | 68.9 ± 21.4 nmol/mg | ( |
| IGT ( | 54 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 37 ± 2 * | IGT/Obese | 95 ± 6 nmol/g | 38.5 ± 6.8 nmol/mg | |||
| Controls ( | 53 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 43 ± 2 * | OW | 126 ± 12 nmol/g | 35.6 ± 10.0 nmol/mg | |||
| Trained ( | 51 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 58 ± 2 * | Lean | 156 ± 25 nmol/g | 49.7 ± 12.6 nmol/mg | |||
| Amati et al. (2011) [ | Obese (11 M/10 F) | 67 ± 1 | VO2peak-, Rel: 33 * | Obese, | 160 ± 18 nmol/g | Obese >, Athletes, NW sed (C18:1, 24:0, 24:1) | Ath, Obese > NW sed for content and droplet density | Total DAGs ( |
| NW (3 M/4 F) | 67 ± 2 | VO2peak-, Rel: 42 * | NW | 80 ± 27 nmol/g | ||||
| Athletes | 65 ± 1 | VO2peak-, Rel: 53 * | Lean/NW | 83 ± 21 nmol/g | ||||
| Chow et al. (2014) [ | Trained (8 M/7 F) | 24 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 49 ± 2 * | Lean | 42.6 ± 4.6 ng/mg | ↑ sat | 4.0 ± 0.5 μg/mg | No |
| Sed (7 M/6 F) | 2 w ± 0.6 | VO2peak-Rel: 39 ± 1 * | Lean | 30.3 ± 2.7 ng/mg | 3.9 ± 0.5 μg/mg | |||
| Chow et al. (2017) [ | Trained (16M/13F) | 26 ± 0.9 | VO2peak-Rel: 62–71 ‡ | Lean | - | - | T1: ↑↑ | - |
| Sed (15 M/13 F) | 23 ± 0.6 | VO2peak-Rel: 53–56 ‡ | Lean | - | - | T1: ↑ | - | |
| Bergman et al. (2010) | Athletes ( | 23 ± 0.7 | VO2peak-Rel: 68 ± 2 * | Lean | - | - | ~21 = IMTG saturation, | DAG% saturation (curvilinear) |
| Controls ( | 21 ± 0.7 | self-reported < 2 h PA per wk | Lean | - | - | >16:0, 16:1, <18:0, 18:2 | ||
| Baranowski et al. (2011) [ | Sed ( | 20 ± 0.7 | VO2peak-Rel: 47 ± 3 * | Lean | Plasma 62.4 ± 16.4 < in RBCs | - | - | - |
| Trained | 21 ± 0.9 | VO2peak-Rel: 57 ± 6 * | Lean | Plasma 60.8 ± 11.1 | - | - | - | |
| Bergman | Obese (4 M/2 F) | 40 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 25 ± 4 * | Obese | - | - | - | total and Sat DAG in skeletal muscle membranes |
| T2D (6 M) | 44 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 25 ± 2 * | OW/ | - | - | - | ||
| Athletes (8 M/2 F) | 35 ± 3 | VO2peak-Rel: 56 ± 5 * | lean | - | - | - | ||
| Bergman | Athletes (11 M/4 F) | 41 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 48 ± 4 * | Lean | Serum: Not different in obese | - | - | C16:0 Cer and C18:0 sphingomyelin correlated w/ whole body insulin resistance |
| T2D (11 M/4 F) | 43 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 19 ± 3 * | Obese-T2D | Serum: ↑ | ↑ C18:0, C20:0, C24:1 to Ath and Ob, | - | ||
| Obese (9 M/5 F) | 40 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 24 ± 3 * | Obese | Serum: Not different in lean | - | - | ||
| Bergman | Athletes ( | 41 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 48 ± 4 * | Lean | C:24: > T2D and Obese | - | - | Not total, but C:18 |
| T2D ( | 43 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 19 ± 3 * | Obese-T2D | C:18: > Ath = Obese | - | - | ||
| Obese ( | 40 ± 2 | VO2peak-Rel: 24 ± 3 * | Obese | - | - | - | ||
| Søgaard | Young (11 M) | 23 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 46 ± 1 * | Lean | 622 ± 74 | > C:16, C:18,C:22 vs. both OLD | In young: HOMA-IR correlated with C16:0 and total Cer. No association in the old. | |
| Young Trained | 23 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 53 ± 2 * | Lean | 661 ± 91 | - | |||
| Old (18 M) | 66 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 31 ± 1 * | Lean/OW | 410 ± 66 | - | - | ||
| Old Trained (15 M) | 64 ± 1 | VO2peak-Rel: 43 ± 4 * | Lean | 550 ± 74 | - | - | ||
| Perreault | Lean (8 M/6 F) | 43 ± 2 | Sed (<2 h/wk PA) | Lean | - | - | - | (−) Many sarcolemmal lipids, Mito/ER, nuclear C18; (+) mito ER/DAGs |
| Athletes (10 M/6 F) | 43 ± 1 | Masters Athletes | Lean | - | - | - | ||
| Obese (8 M/7 F) | 42 ± 2 | Sed (<2 h/wk PA) | Obese | - | - | - | ||
| T2D (7 M/5 F) | 46 ± 2 | Sed (<2 h/wk PA) | Obese-T2D | > all, most in sarcolemmal | > C16, C18, sarcolemmal, > C18 in nuclear fraction | - |
↑, increase; ↑↑, large increase; Abs, absolute; Cer, ceramides; DAG, diacylglycerol; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; F, female: h, hour; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; IMTG, intramuscular trigycerides; IS, insulin sensitivity; M, male; Min, minutes; Mito, mitochondrial; n, number of subjects; ng/mg, nanogram per milligram; nmol/g, nanomole per gram; nmoL/mg, nanomole per milligram; NW, normal weight; OW, overweight; PA, physical Activity; RBCs, red blood Cells; Rel, relative; Sat, saturated; Sed, sedentary; T1, myosin heavy-chain 1; T2D, persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus; VO2peak, peak oxygen uptake; y, years; μg/mg, micrograms per milligram; Rel, relative * (milliliters per kilogram body weight per minute ); ‡ (milliliters per kilogram of fat free mass per minute).
Exercise training studies in humans.
| Reference | Subjects | Age (y) | Aerobic Fitness | Health/BMI | Training | Muscle Ceramide | Ceramide Species | Muscle Fat or IMTG | Associations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruce et al. (2004) [ | Control | 46 ± 3 | Rel: ~30 * | OW | 8 wk, AET | - | - | BL <, ↔ IMTG | No |
| T2D ( | 48 ± 2 | Obese | - | - | BL >, ↓ IMTG | ||||
| Bruce et al. (2006) [ | Obese | 36 ± 3 | Rel: 24 ± 2 * | Obese | 8 wk, AET | BL (734 nmol/g), ↓ | C16:0, C16:1, C18:0, C18:1, C18:2, C20:0 ↓ | ↔ | No |
| Dube et al. (2008) [ | Old | 66.4 ± 0.8 | Rel: 34 ± 7 *, ↑ 7% | OW/Obese | 16 wk, AET | ↓ | - | ↑ ~21% | Cer ( |
| Dube et al. (2011) [ | DIWL | 67 ± 2 | Rel: 31 ± 2 *, ↔ | OW-Obese, NGT-IGT | DIWL | BL=, ↔ | ↓ C14:0, C20:0, C24:0; ↑C24:1 | BL=, ↓ IMTG | BL total and some cer species, ↓ in C16:0 and C24:1 with improved IS |
| Ex (4 M/4 F) | 68 ± 2 | Rel: 32 ± 2 *, ↔ | OW-Obese, NGT-IGT | 16 wk; AET | ↓ 30–40% | ↓ all but C16:0, C18:1 | BL=, ↑ IMTG | ||
| Devrives et al. (2013) [ | Lean (12 F) | 41 ± 2 | Rel: 26 ± 1 *, ↑ | Lean | 12 wk, AET | ~110 nmol/g dw, ↔ | - | AET localizes IMCs close to Mito and IMF, away from SS | - |
| Obese (11 F) | 40 ± 3 | Rel: 19 ± 2 *, ↑ | Obese | ~130 nmol/g dw, ↔ | - | - | |||
| Samjoo et al. (2013) [ | Lean (9 M) | 38 ± 3 | Rel: 47 ± 2 ‡, ↑ | Lean | 12 wk, AET | ↔ | - | AET localizes IMCs close to Mito and IMF, away from SS | No |
| Obese (9 M) | 39 ± 3 | Rel:45 ± 2 ‡, ↑ | Obese | ~100 nmol/g, ↔ | - | ||||
| Coen et al. (2015) [ | Control | 42.1 ± 9.9 | Rel: ~18 ‡, ↑ | OW/Obese | None, RYGB | ↓ | ↓ 16,18:1, 24:1 | ↓↓ | No |
| Ex ( | 41.6 ± 9.3 | OW/Obese | post RYGB; 12 wk | ↓↓ | ↓ 16,18,18:1, 24:1 | ↓ | |||
| Kasumov | NGT | 62 ± 2 | Absolute: 2 ± 0.1 L/min | Obese | 12 wk | Plasma: BL=, ↓ | ↓ C14:0, C16:0, C24:0 | - | Total and C:14 cer negative with GIR change |
| T2D (5 M/5 F) | 65 ± 2 | T2D-Obese | Plasma: BL= ↓ | ↓ C14:0, C16:0, C18:1, C24:0 | - | ||||
| Søgaard | Control | 31.3 ± 1.5 | Rel: 42 * | OW | 10 wk, AET | BL= | No difference at BL, ↓ C22:0 | - | No |
| Offspring | 33.1 ± 1.4 | Rel: 38 * | OW-offspring of T2D | 10 wk, AET | BL= | No difference at BL, ↓ C22:0 | - | ||
| McKenzie et al. (2017) [ | HipFx | 78.4 ± 13.3 | Low | OW | 12 wk RE and RET | ~100 nmol/g, ↔ | ↔ | - | No |
| Shepherd | Obese (8 M) | 24 ± 2 | Rel: 34 *; ↑ | Obese | 4 wk, HIIT | ↓ | ↓ Cer 18:0 | ↔ | No |
| Obese (8 M) | 26 ± 2 | Obese | 4 wk, AET | ↓ | ↓ Cer 18:0 | ↔ | No | ||
| Søgaard | Young | 32 ± 2 | Rel: ~27* | Obese | 6 wk, HIIT | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | Not reported |
| Old | 63 ± 1 | Obese | 6 wk, HIIT | ↓ | ↓ Cer Sat, 18:0 | ↔ |
>, greater than; <, less than; ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; ↓↓, large decrease; ↔, no change; Abs, absolute; AET, aerobic exercise training; BL, baseline; BL=, no difference at baseline between groups; BMI, Body Mass Index; COX, cyclooxygenase; Cer, Ceramide; DIWL, diet-induced weight loss; Ex, exercise; dw, dry tissue weight; GIR, glucose infusion rate; HIIT, high intensity interval training; HipFx, hip fracture patients; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; IMC, intramuscular ceramides; IMF, intramyofibrillar; IMTG, intramuscular triglycerides; IS, insulin sensitivity; M, men; Mito, mitochondrial; n, number of subjects; NGT, normal glucose tolerance; nmol/g, nanomole per gram; OW, overweight; Rel, relative; RET, resistance exercise training; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SS, subsarcollemal; T2D, persons with type-2 diabetes mellitus; wk, week; Rel, relative * (milliliters per kilogram body weight per minute); ‡ (milliliters per kilogram of fat free mass per minute).