AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In skeletal muscle, ceramides may be involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance through an attenuation of insulin signalling. This study investigated total skeletal muscle ceramide fatty acid content in participants exhibiting a wide range of insulin sensitivities. METHODS: The middle-aged male participants (n=33) were matched for lean body mass and divided into four groups: type 2 diabetes (T2D, n=8), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n=9), healthy controls (CON, n=8) and endurance-trained (TR, n=8). A two step (28 and 80 mU m(-2) min(-1)) sequential euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp was performed for 120 and 90 min for step 1 and step 2, respectively. Muscle biopsies were obtained from vastus lateralis at baseline, and after steps 1 and 2. RESULTS: Glucose infusion rates increased in response to insulin infusion, and significant differences were present between groups (T2D<IGT<CON<TR). At baseline, muscle ceramide content was 108+/-7, 95+/-6, 126+/-12 and 156+/-25 nmol total ceramide fatty acids/g wet weight of tissue in the T2D, IGT, CON and TR groups, respectively, and muscle ceramide content was higher (p<0.01) in the TR than the IGT group. Muscle ceramide content was not influenced by insulin infusion. Interestingly, a positive correlation (r=0.42, p<0.05) was present between muscle ceramide content at baseline and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Total muscle ceramide content was similar between individuals showing marked differences in insulin sensitivity, and therefore does not seem to be a major factor in muscle insulin resistance. Furthermore, aerobic capacity does not appear to influence muscle ceramide content.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: In skeletal muscle, ceramides may be involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance through an attenuation of insulin signalling. This study investigated total skeletal muscle ceramide fatty acid content in participants exhibiting a wide range of insulin sensitivities. METHODS: The middle-aged male participants (n=33) were matched for lean body mass and divided into four groups: type 2 diabetes (T2D, n=8), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n=9), healthy controls (CON, n=8) and endurance-trained (TR, n=8). A two step (28 and 80 mU m(-2) min(-1)) sequential euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp was performed for 120 and 90 min for step 1 and step 2, respectively. Muscle biopsies were obtained from vastus lateralis at baseline, and after steps 1 and 2. RESULTS:Glucose infusion rates increased in response to insulin infusion, and significant differences were present between groups (T2D<IGT<CON<TR). At baseline, muscle ceramide content was 108+/-7, 95+/-6, 126+/-12 and 156+/-25 nmol total ceramide fatty acids/g wet weight of tissue in the T2D, IGT, CON and TR groups, respectively, and muscle ceramide content was higher (p<0.01) in the TR than the IGT group. Muscle ceramide content was not influenced by insulin infusion. Interestingly, a positive correlation (r=0.42, p<0.05) was present between muscle ceramide content at baseline and insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Total muscle ceramide content was similar between individuals showing marked differences in insulin sensitivity, and therefore does not seem to be a major factor in muscle insulin resistance. Furthermore, aerobic capacity does not appear to influence muscle ceramide content.
Authors: D A Pan; S Lillioja; A D Kriketos; M R Milner; L A Baur; C Bogardus; A B Jenkins; L H Storlien Journal: Diabetes Date: 1997-06 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: M Straczkowski; I Kowalska; M Baranowski; A Nikolajuk; E Otziomek; P Zabielski; A Adamska; A Blachnio; J Gorski; M Gorska Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Naoki Kumashiro; Derek M Erion; Dongyan Zhang; Mario Kahn; Sara A Beddow; Xin Chu; Christopher D Still; Glenn S Gerhard; Xianlin Han; James Dziura; Kitt Falk Petersen; Varman T Samuel; Gerald I Shulman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: S Larsen; N Stride; M Hey-Mogensen; C N Hansen; J L Andersen; S Madsbad; D Worm; J W Helge; F Dela Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Bryan C Bergman; Leigh Perreault; Devon M Hunerdosse; Mary C Koehler; Ali M Samek; Robert H Eckel Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-03-18
Authors: S O Shepherd; M Cocks; P J Meikle; N A Mellett; A M Ranasinghe; T A Barker; A J M Wagenmakers; C S Shaw Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Jose A Chavez; M Mobin Siddique; Siew Tein Wang; Jianhong Ching; James A Shayman; Scott A Summers Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Paul M Coen; John J Dubé; Francesca Amati; Maja Stefanovic-Racic; Robert E Ferrell; Frederico G S Toledo; Bret H Goodpaster Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 9.461