| Literature DB >> 32098399 |
Bronisława Skrzep-Poloczek1, Jakub Poloczek2, Elżbieta Chełmecka3, Agnieszka Dulska1, Ewa Romuk4, Maciej Idzik5, Wojciech Kazura1, Katarzyna Nabrdalik6, Janusz Gumprecht6, Jerzy Jochem1, Dominika Marta Stygar1.
Abstract
Obesity and high-fat diet (HF) are prevalent causes of oxidative stress (OS). Duodenal-jejunal omega switch (DJOS) is a bariatric procedure used for body mass reduction, extensively tested in animal models. We studied the long-term impact of bariatric surgery and an HF diet on the oxidative stress markers in erythrocytes and heart muscles of rats. We analyzed superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione transferase (GST), glutathione reductase (GR), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in DJOS or SHAM (control) operated rats fed with different dietary protocols (control diet (CD) and high-fat diet (HF)), before and after the surgery (CD/CD, HF/HF, CD/HF, and HF/CD). We observed higher erythrocytes CAT, GST and GPx activity in DJOS-operated (vs. SHAM) rats fed with an HF/HF diet. For DJOS-operated rats, erythrocytes CAT and GPx activity and MDA concentration were significantly lower in CD/CD group. We observed increased heart muscle GR activity in SHAM-operated rats (vs. DJOS bariatric surgery) fed with an HF/HF diet. Change from HF to CD diet increased heart muscle GPx activity after DJOS bariatric surgery. Heart muscle SOD activity was lower in HF/HF and CD/CD groups after DJOS bariatric surgery (vs. SHAM). DJOS surgery significantly reduced heart muscle MDA concentration in HF/HF and HF/CD groups (vs. SHAM). We conclude that the selected dietary patterns had a stronger impact on oxidative stress markers in erythrocytes and heart muscle than DJOS bariatric surgery.Entities:
Keywords: DJOS; HF diet; antioxidants; bariatric surgery; high-fat diet; oxidative stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098399 PMCID: PMC7070542 DOI: 10.3390/antiox9020183
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1The experimental setup and surgeries performed: (A) design of the experiment, (B) DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) bariatric protocol and (C) SHAM (control) bariatric protocol.
Figure 2(A) Mean glutathione reductase (GR) activity (IU/g) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet, before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery. (B) Mean catalase (CAT) activity (IU/g) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet, before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery. (C) Mean glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity (IU/g) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet, before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery.
Figure 3Mean glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity (IU/g) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery.
Figure 4Mean total superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (NU/mg) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet, before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery.
Figure 5Mean malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration (μmol/g) in erythrocytes of rats from groups fed with high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diet, before and after DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery.
The results of glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), total superoxide dismutase (SOD), Mn-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), copper–zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in heart muscle of rats from study groups subjected to high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diets. Descriptive statistics and results of two-way analysis of variance for inter-group comparison between DJOS-operated (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) and SHAM-operated (control) study groups. Results are presented as mean ± SD or median (lower–upper quartile). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
| Oxidative Stress Marker | DJOS-Operated | SHAM-Operated | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF/HF | HF/CD | CD/HF | CD/CD | HF/HF | HF/CD | CD/HF | CD/CD | Group | Op. | Int. | |
|
| 27.56 ± 1.39 | 15.41 ± 1.95 | 14.19 ± 2.35 | 16.45 ± 2.22 | 66.19 ± 17.50 | 30.30 ± 7.77 | 30.53 ± 5.01 | 14.09 ± 2.29 |
|
|
|
|
| 59.91 ± 3.55 | 104.42 ± 12.84 | 84.68 ± 42.72 | 92.33 ± 9.48 | 306.63 ± 62.55 | 93.14 ± 7.01 | 78.80 ± 14.33 | 100.82 ± 27.05 |
|
|
|
|
| 15.81 ± 1.23 | 19.42 ± 1.70 | 18.76 ± 5.28 | 18.28 ± 1.82 | 14.58 ± 4.72 | 14.76 ± 2.44 | 15.49 ± 2.44 | 16.35 ± 1.38 |
|
| 0.506 |
|
| 3.44 ± 0.61 | 3.74 ± 0.30 | 2.89 ± 1.08 | 3.50 ± 0.57 | 2.66 ± 0.73 | 3.58 ± 0.82 | 3.34 ± 0.25 | 3.43 ± 0.48 | 0.121 | 0.632 | 0.074 |
|
| 79.75 ± 4.71 | 129.37 ± 27.69 | 105.22 ± 23.89 | 93.70 ± 9.57 | 146.11 ± 6.99 | 118.33 ± 17.91 | 77.54 ± 11.64 | 123.13 ± 26.37 |
|
|
|
|
| 67.40 ± 4.63 | 89.05 ± 2.89 | 82.62 ± 20.55 | 80.50 ± 7.10 | 45.38 ± 22.15 | 81.13 ± 16.28 | 66.17 ± 8.26 | 69.25 ± 23.10 |
|
| 0.700 |
|
| 11.96 | 42.38 | 19.98 | 16.47 | 16.85 | 26.67 | 10.34 | 59.60 |
| 0.333 |
|
|
| 3.48 ± 1.33 | 2.47 ± 0.24 | 6.10 ± 2.58 | 2.94 ± 0.79 | 8.66 ± 1.65 | 10.53 ± 1.91 | 2.08 ± 0.78 | 2.07 ± 0.58 |
|
|
|
Abbreviations: Group: HF/HF, CD/HF, HF/CD and CD/CD—dietary patterns applied in groups of rats for 8 weeks before and 8 weeks after surgery: HF = high-fat diet; CD = control diet; Op. = type of surgery used in the experiment: DJOS = duodenal-jejunal omega switch, SHAM = control; Int.—interaction within the dietary patterns and type of the surgery. Statistically significant values are bolded.
Multiple comparisons in contrast analysis. Post hoc analysis of glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), total superoxide dismutase (SOD), Mn-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), copper–zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in erythrocytes and heart muscle of rats from study groups subjected to high-fat (HF) and/or to (CD) control diets and subjected to DJOS (duodenal-jejunal omega switch) or SHAM (control) surgery. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistically significant values are bolded.
| Oxidative Stress Markers Post hoc | DJOS vs. SHAM | DJOS | SHAM | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1: HF/HF | 2: HF/CD | 3: CD/HF | 4: CD/CD | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 4 | 2 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 4 | 3 vs. 4 | 1 vs. 2 | 1 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 4 | 2 vs. 3 | 2 vs. 4 | 3 vs. 4 | |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
| 0.189 |
|
| 0.557 |
|
| 0.207 |
|
| 0.226 | 0.114 |
| 0.594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.056 | 0.375 | 0.259 |
|
|
|
| 0.490 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.939 |
| 0.324 |
|
|
|
| 0.180 | 0.771 | 0.542 | 0.094 | 0.758 | 0.178 | 0.296 |
|
|
| 0.303 |
| 0.178 |
|
|
| 0.382 |
|
| 0.058 |
| 0.127 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.876 | 0.763 | 0.857 | 0.542 |
| 0.181 |
| 0.115 | 0.293 |
|
| 0.156 |
| 0.091 | 0.898 | 0.070 |
|
|
| 0.142 | 0.774 |
|
|
|
| 0.205 |
|
| 0.154 | 0.356 |
| 0.621 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| 0.572 |
|
|
| 0.771 | 0.803 | 0.589 |
|
|
| 0.956 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.529 | 0.742 | 0.635 |
| 0.171 | 0.075 | 0.273 | 0.500 | 0.669 |
|
|
| 0.425 | 0.668 | 0.222 |
|
| 0.461 |
| 0.064 | 0.270 |
| 0.095 | 0.160 | 0.705 | 0.513 | 0.782 | 0.911 | 0.586 | 0.291 | 0.676 | 0.361 | 0.618 |
|
|
| 0.300 |
|
|
|
| 0.192 |
|
| 0.280 |
|
|
|
| 0.650 |
|
|
|
| 0.380 | 0.113 | 0.215 | <0.05 | 0.096 | 0.150 | 0.475 | 0.343 | 0.813 |
|
|
| 0.154 | 0.190 | 0.904 |
|
| 0.222 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.277 |
|
|
| 0.116 |
|
|
|
| <0.001 |
|
|
|
|
| 0.303 | 0.230 |
| 0.514 |
| 0.578 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.990 |
Column 1: Inter-group comparisons between study groups pre-HF diet vs. post-HF diet, pre-CD vs. post-HF diet, per-HF vs. post-CD and pre-CD vs. post-CD; groups DJOS vs. SHAM. Column 2: Intra-group comparisons between pre-HF diet vs. post-HF diet, pre-CD vs. post-HF diet, pre-HF vs. post-CD and pre-CD vs. post-CD groups after DJOS surgery. Column 3: Intra-group comparisons between pre-HF diet vs. post-HF diet, pre-CD vs. post-HF diet, pre-HF vs. post-CD and pre-CD vs. post-CD groups after SHAM surgery.