| Literature DB >> 25960774 |
Nathalie Auberval1, Stéphanie Dal1, William Bietiger1, Michel Pinget2, Nathalie Jeandidier2, Elisa Maillard-Pedracini1, Valérie Schini-Kerth3, Séverine Sigrist1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and hepatic complications. Oxidative stress in metabolic tissues has emerged as a universal feature of metabolic syndrome and its co-morbidities. We aimed to develop a rapidly and easily induced model of metabolic syndrome in rats to evaluate its impact on plasma and tissue oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: Complications; High-fat diet; Metabolic syndrome; Oxidative stress
Year: 2014 PMID: 25960774 PMCID: PMC4424531 DOI: 10.1186/1758-5996-6-130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Composition of ND and HFD
| A04 (ND) | WESTERN RD (HFD) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 3.1 | 21.4 |
|
| 16.1 | 17.5 |
|
| 3.9 | 3.5 |
|
| 5.1 | 4.1 |
|
| 59.9 | 50 |
|
| 11.9 | 3.5 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Body weight of ND (■) or HFD (▲) rats over 2 months. The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM with several animals per group (ND, n = 6 and HFD, n = 10). *: significant difference between the body weight of ND and HFD rats (**: p < 0.01 and ***: p < 0.001).
Figure 2Effect of 2 months of ND or HFD on glucose metabolism of rats. Glyceamia (A) and c-peptidemia (B) under fasting and refeeding conditions, glucose tolerance test (IpGTT) (C), and IpGTT area under the curve (D) The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (ND: n = 6 and HFD: n = 10). *: p < 0.05: significant difference between fasting and refeeding conditions for glycemia or C-peptidemia between ND and HFD rats. ##: p < 0.01: significant difference between ND and HFD C-peptidemia under fasting conditions. $$$ p < 0.001: significant difference between ND and HFD C-peptidemia under refeeding conditions.
Effect of ND or HFD on plasma parameters after 2 months
| ND | HFD | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 2.04 ± 0.29 | 3.07 ± 0.60 |
|
| 0.25 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.03 |
|
| 1.58 ± 0.07 | 8.46 ± 1.19** |
|
| 2.92 ± 0.41 | 3.43 ± 0.47 |
|
| 2,4 ± 0,12 | 4,5 ± 0,4*** |
The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (ND, n = 6 and HFD, n = 10. **: p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001: significant differences between ND and HFD rats).
Figure 3Effect of ND (A) or HFD (B) on rat pancreatic islets after 2 months. Islets were stained with Masson’s trichrome, and the surface area was determined (C). *: significant difference in islet surface area between ND and HFD rats (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 4Effect of ND or HFD on the rat liver after 2 months. Tissues were stained with Masson’s trichrome (A and B), and glycogen was extracted from the liver and quantified (C). The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM with five animals per group. *: significant difference in hepatic glycogen between the ND and HFD groups (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 5Effects of ND or HFD on oxidative stress in the pancreas (A), liver (B) and mesenteric artery (C) after 2 months. Tissues from ND (left pictures) or HFD (right pictures) were stained with DHE, and the amount of DHE was quantified for several animals per group (ND, n = 4-5-4 and HFD, n = 4-4-5, respectively). *: significant difference in oxidative stress between the ND and HFD groups (*: p < 0.05 and **: p < 0.01).